Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:25:18.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Numbered Treaties and the Politics of Incoherency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2019

Gina Starblanket
Gina Starblanket*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N1
*
E-mail: gina.starblanket@ucalgary.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the role of the numbered treaties relative to the continuity of the settler colonial project in Canada. Although the treaties are often invoked to characterize the federal government's commitment toward strengthening or renewing its relationship with Indigenous peoples at a symbolic level, there remains a disjuncture between the “nation-to-nation” depictions of treaties and the complex political relationships that Indigenous peoples have called for since their signing. This article explores the inconsistent ways in which treaties have been taken up within Canadian legal and political institutions, arguing that the incoherency surrounding treaties promulgates the notion that treaties are being implemented while simultaneously obscuring, distorting and minimizing the rights of Indigenous peoples in practice. It demonstrates that the failure to engage with treaties as the locus of Indigenous peoples’ distinct political relationship with the Canadian state functions to continually produce conditions of colonization and dispossession through the denial of Indigenous sovereignty and jurisdiction as affirmed in treaties.

Résumé

Cet article analyse le rôle des Traités numérotés dans la continuité du projet colonial des pionniers au Canada. Souvent invoqué pour caractériser l'engagement du gouvernement fédéral visant à renforcer ou à renouveler sa relation avec les peuples autochtones à un niveau symbolique, il subsiste une disjonction entre, d'une part, les représentations de « nation à nation » des traités et, de l'autre, les relations politiques complexes que les peuples autochtones ont réclamées depuis leur signature. L'article examine la manière incohérente dont les traités ont été adoptés au sein des institutions juridiques et politiques canadiennes, faisant valoir que l'incohérence les entourant conforte l'idée que les traités sont appliqués tout en obscurcissant, déformant et minimisant les droits des peuples autochtones dans la pratique. Il démontre que le fait de ne pas s'engager dans les traités en tant que lieu de la relation politique distincte des peuples autochtones avec l'État canadien a pour effet de produire constamment des conditions de colonisation et de dépossession par le déni de la souveraineté et de la juridiction autochtones, comme le stipulent les traités.

Keywords

Indigenous peoplesIndigenous-Crown relationshipnumbered treatiescolonialismCanadian constitutionnational culture
Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 443 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Howard. 1975. Prison of Grass: Canada from a Native Point of View. Saskatoon: Fifth House.Google Scholar
Allodi-Ross, Francesca. 2017. “Who Calls the Shots? Balancing Individual and Collective Interests in The Assertion of Aboriginal and Treaty Harvesting Rights.” In The Right Relationship: Reimagining the Implementation of Historical Treaties, ed. John Borrows and Michael Coyle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Asch, Michael. 2014. On Being Here to Stay: Treaties and Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barrera, Jorge. 2018. “Trudeau's Words Don't Match Early Indicators on Indigenous Rights Framework: Letter.” CBC Indigenous, September 11. https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/indigenous-rights-framework-letter-trudeau-1.4818000 (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
Barsh, Russel Lawrence and Henderson, James Youngblood. 1982. The Road: Indian Tribes and Political Liberty. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boldt, Menno, Long, Anthony and Littlebear, Leroy. 1985. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Borrows, John. 2002. Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Harold. 1969. The Unjust Society: The Tragedy of Canada's Indians. Edmonton: Hurtig.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Harold and Hildebrandt, Walter. 2000. Treaty Elders of Saskatchewan: Our Dream Is That Our Peoples Will One Day Be Clearly Recognized as Nations. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, , S, Glen. 2007. Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the Politics of Recognition in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4): 437–460.Google Scholar
Craft, Aimée. 2013. Breathing Life into the Stone Fort Treaty: An Anishinabe Understanding of Treaty One. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing.Google Scholar
Craft, Aimée. 2015. “The Role of Indigenous Women in Treaties and Traditional Governance.” Interview with UM Today, March 16. http://news.umanitoba.ca/the-role-of-indigenous-women-in-treaties-and-traditional-governance/ (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
Daschuk, James. 2013. Clearing the Plains: Disease, Politics of Starvation, and the Loss of Aboriginal Life. Regina: University of Regina Press.Google Scholar
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita. 2010. Identity/Difference Politics: How Difference Is Produced, and Why It Matters. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey. 2008. The Cultivation of Resentment: Treaty Rights and the New Right. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dussault, et al. , René. 1996. Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Gehl, Lynn. 2015. “Canada's Indian Policy Is a Process of Deception.” Briarpatch, March 2. https://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/canadas-indian-policy-is-a-process-of-deception (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources), [2014] 2 S.C.R. 447.Google Scholar
Green, Joyce. 1995. “Towards a Detente with History: Confronting Canada's Colonial Legacy.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 12 (Fall): 85–105.Google Scholar
Green, Joyce. 2000. “The Difference Debate: Reducing Rights to Cultural Flavours.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 133–44.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Walter, Rider, Dorothy First and Carter, Sarah. 1996. The True Spirit and Original Intent of Treaty 7. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
INAC (Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada). 2013. “The Numbered Treaties (1871–1921).” https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1360948213124/1544620003549 (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
INAC (Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada). 2018. “Overview of a Recognition and Implementation of Indigenous Rights Framework.” https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1536350959665/1539959903708 (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
King, Hayden and Pasternak, Shiri. 2018a. Canada's Emerging Indigenous Rights Framework: A Critical Analysis. Toronto: Yellowhead Institute.Google Scholar
King, Hayden and Pasternak, Shiri. 2018b. “A Different PM Trudeau, Same Buckskin Jacket but Where Is the ‘Real Change’ for Indigenous Peoples?” Indigenous Policy Journal 29 (1). https://www.indigenouspolicy.org/index.php/ipj/article/view/546/535Google Scholar
Ladner, Kiera. 2003. “Treaty Federalism: An Indigenous Vision of Canadian Federalisms.” In New Trends in Canadian Federalism, ed. Rocher, François and Smith, Miriam. Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
Ladner, Kiera. 2017. “Taking the Field: 50 Years of Indigenous Politics in the CJPS.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 163–79.Google Scholar
Little Bear, Leroy. 1986. “Aboriginal Rights and the Canadian ‘Grundnorm.’” In Arduous Journey: Canadian Indians and Decolonization, ed. Rick Ponting, J.. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
McCrossan, Michael and Ladner, Kiera. 2016. “Eliminating Indigenous Jurisdictions: Federalism, the Supreme Court of Canada, and Territorial Rationalities of Power.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 411–31.Google Scholar
McIvor, Bruce and Gunn, Kate. 2016. “Stepping into Canada's Shoes: Tsilhqot'in, Grassy Narrows and the Division of Powers.” University of New Brunswick Law Journal 67 (1): 146–66.Google Scholar
McKay, Edward. 1873. MG 12, B1, Box 1, #164, Reel M134 (Morris Papers, Lieutenant Governor's Collection).Google Scholar
McNeil, Kent. 1982. Native Rights and the Boundaries of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan Native Law Centre.Google Scholar
McNeil, Kent. 2001. “Extinguishment of Aboriginal Title in Canada: Treaties, Legislation, and Judicial Discretion.” Ottawa Law Review 33 (2): 301–46.Google Scholar
Miller, James Rodger. 2009. Compact, Contract, Covenant: Aboriginal Treaty-Making in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Milloy, John. 2008. Indian Act Colonialism: A Century of Dishonour, 1869–1969. West Vancouver: National Centre for First Nations Governance.Google Scholar
Morris, Alexander. 1880. The Treaties of Canada with the Indians of Manitoba and the North-West Territories: Including the Negotiations on Which They Were Based, and Other Information Relating Thereto. Toronto: Belfords, Clarke.Google Scholar
Peach, Ian. 2011. “More Than a Section 35 Right: Indigenous Self-Government as Inherent in Canada's Constitutional Structure.” Canadian Political Science Association paper series. https://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2011/Peach.pdf (September 19, 2018).Google Scholar
Poelzer, Greg and Coates, Ken. 2006. “Aboriginal Peoples and the Crown in Canada: Completing the Canadian Experiment.” In Continuity and Change in Canadian Politics; Essays in Honour of David E. Smith, ed. Michelmann, Hans and Clercy, Cristine de. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
R. v. Badger, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 771.Google Scholar
R. v. Marshall, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456.Google Scholar
R. v. The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Ex parte: The Indian Association of Alberta, Union of New Brunswick Indians, Union of Nova Scotia Indians, [1981] 4 C.L.N.R. 86 (Eng. C.A.)Google Scholar
R. v. Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507.Google Scholar
Royal Proclamation, [1763] R.S.C., 1985, App. II, No. 1.Google Scholar
R. v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Indian Association of Alberta and others, [1982] 2 All E.R. 118 (C.A.) at 123.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Mark. 2017. “Around 1978: Family, Culture, and Race in the Federal Production of Indianness.” In Critically Sovereign: Indigenous Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies, ed. Barker, Joanne. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H. 2017. Canada's Odyssey: A Country Based on Incomplete Conquests. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter and Jones, Roger. 1995. Aboriginal Peoples and Constitutional Reform. Paper prepared for the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. http://data2.archives.ca/rcap/pdf/rcap-24.pdf (September 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Simpson, Audra. 2016. “The State Is a Man: Theresa Spence, Loretta Saunders and the Gender of Settler Sovereignty.” Theory & Event 19 (4).Google Scholar
Simpson, Leanne. 2008. “Looking after Gdoo-naaganinaa: Precolonial Nishnaabeg Diplomatic and Treaty Relationships.” Wicazo Sa Review 23 (2): 29–42.Google Scholar
Stark, Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik. 2016. “Criminal Empire: The Making of the Savage in a Lawless Land.” Theory & Event 19 (4).Google Scholar
St. Germain, Jill. 2009. Broken Treaties: United States and Canadian Relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868–1885. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John Leonard. 1985. Treaty Research Report: Treaty Four (1874). Ottawa: Treaties and Historical Research Centre, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.Google Scholar
Tobias, John L. 1983. “Canada's Subjugation of the Plains Cree, 1879–1885.” Canadian Historical Review 64 (4): 519–48.Google Scholar
Townshend, Roger. 2017. “What Changes Did Grassy Narrows First Nation Make to Federalism and Other Doctrines?” Canadian Bar Review 95 (2): 459–88.Google Scholar
Trudeau, Justin. 2015. “Prime Minister Trudeau Delivers a Speech to the Assembly of First Nations Special Chiefs Assembly.” Gatineau, Quebec. December 8. https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2015/12/08/prime-minister-justin-trudeau-delivers-speech-assembly-first-nations-special-chiefs (December 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Justin. 2018. “Remarks by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons on the Recognition and Implementation of Rights Framework.” Ottawa, Ontario. February 14. https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2018/02/14/remarks-prime-minister-house-commons-recognition-and-implementation-rights-framework (September 18, 2018)Google Scholar
Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 257.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 2000. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. Ivison, Duncan, Patton, Paul and Sanders, Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Venne, Sharon. 1997. “Understanding Treaty 6: An Indigenous Perspective.” In Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada, ed. Asch, Michael. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Vimalassery, Manu, Pegues, Juliana Hu and Goldstein, Alyosha. 2016. “Introduction: On Colonial Unknowing.” Theory & Event 19 (4).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert. 1997. Linking Arms Together: American Indian Treaty Visions of Law and Peace, 1600–1800. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. “Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native.” Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409.Google Scholar
Youngblood Henderson, James. 2002. “Sui Generis and Treaty Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 6 (4): 415.Google Scholar