Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:28:27.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polarized Pluralism in the Canadian Party System: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association, June 5, 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2008

Richard Johnston
Richard Johnston*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
Richard Johnston, University of Pennsylvania, 208 S. 37th Street, Room 206, Philadelphia PA,19104-6215, rgcj@sas.upenn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The Canadian party system is an example “polarized pluralism,” whose key feature is domination by a party of the centre. Centrist domination induces centrifugal tendencies elsewhere in the system. Polarized pluralism accounts for several of the system's peculiar features: three-party competition in individual ridings, contrary to the predictions of Duverger's Law; the existence and episodic dynamics of sectional parties; boom and bust cycles in Conservative party electoral history; and the large gaps between federal and provincial outcomes within many provinces. But domination by a centrist party itself demands explanation.

Résumé. Le système canadien des partis politiques exemplifie le «pluralisme polarisé», dont l'élément clé est la force dominante d'un parti du centre. Une telle domination induit des tendances centrifuges ailleurs dans le système. Pour sa part, le pluralisme polarisé explique plusieurs éléments du système canadien : la présence de trois partis compétitifs au niveau de la circonscription, malgré les prédictions du Duverger; l'existence même et la dynamique des partis sectionalistes; l'alternance entre force et faiblesse dans l'histoire du Parti conservateur; et les grands écarts qui se présentent dans plusieurs provinces entre les élections fédérales et les élections provinciales. Dans ce contexte, la force d'un parti centriste se doit d'être expliquée.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 815 - 834
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1983. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.” American Political Science Review 77: 974–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio and Cox, Gary W.. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakvis, Herman and Macpherson, Laura G.. 1995. “Quebec Block Voting and the Canadian Electoral System.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 28: 659–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardi, Luciano and Mair, Peter. 2008. “The Parameters of Party Systems.” Party Politics 14: 147–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2006. “Duverger's Law and the Study of Electoral Systems.” French Politics 4: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 1968. “Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Robert Craig. 1975. Robert Laird Borden, A Biography. Volume I: 1854–1914. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith and Tanenbaum, Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1968. “The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921–1965.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. 1988. “Three Canadian Party Systems: An Interpretation of the Development of National Politics.” In Party Democracy in Canada, ed. Perlin, G.C.. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1994. “Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote.” American Political Science Review 88: 608–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crunican, Paul. 1974. Priests and Politicians: Manitoba Schools and the Election of 1896. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, W.M. 1986. “Updating Duverger's Law.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 19: 585–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick and Boucek, Françoise. 2003. “Constructing the Number of Parties.” Party Politics 9: 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. [1954] 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, trans. North, Barbara and North, Robert. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Enelow, James N. and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Thomas. 1995. Waiting for the Wave: The Reform Party and Preston Manning. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar
Irvine, William P. 1979. Does Canada Need a New Electoral System? Kingston, ON: Queen's University Institute for Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard and Ballantyne, Janet. 1977. “Geography and the Electoral System.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 10: 857–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Brady, Henry E. and Crête, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1954. “Democracy in Alberta.” Canadian Forum November: 175–77; December: 196–98.Google Scholar
Lovink, J.A.A. 1970. “On Analyzing the Impact of the Electoral System on the Party System in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 3: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.R. 1979. Equal Rights: The Jesuits' Estates Act Controversy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. 2nd ed.New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1976. “The Number of Political Parties: A Re-examination of Duverger's Law.” Comparative Politics 9: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1966. “European Political Parties: The Case of Polarized Pluralism.” In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1968. “Political Development and Political Engineering.” In Public Policy, ed. Montgomery, John D. and Hirschmann, Albert O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David E. 1985. “Party Government, Representation, and National Integration in Canada.” In Party Government and Regional Representation in Canada, ed. Aucoin, Peter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar