Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:05:10.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Consequences of the Alternative Vote: Lessons from Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2005

Harold J. Jansen
Harold J. Jansen
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The alternative vote (AV) is an increasingly popular proposal for electoral reform, largely due to Australia's success with it. This article considers the experiences of Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia with AV in past provincial elections. AV had little impact on proportionality and voter turnout, but did contribute to significantly higher rates of ballot rejection. AV was associated with an increase in the number of parties competing in elections, but this is more likely due to a changing social structure than electoral system change. AV facilitated coalitions where incentives to cooperate already existed, as in British Columbia, but it did little to encourage or induce coalitions in Alberta and Manitoba. On balance, it differed little from the single member plurality system.

Résumé. Le vote préférentiel (PV) est une proposition de plus en plus populaire de réforme électorale. Son attrait s'explique en grande partie par son succès en Australie. Cet article étudie les expériences de VP lors d'élections provinciales au Manitoba, en Alberta et en Colombie-Britannique. Le VP a eu peu de répercussions sur la proportionnalité et sur la participation électorale, mais a contribué à augmenter considérablement le nombre de bulletins de vote rejetés. On observe, en association avec le VP, une augmentation du nombre des partis en présence, mais ceci était vraisemblablement dû à l'évolution des structures sociales plus qu'au changement du système électoral. Le VP a facilité les coalitions lorsque des raisons de coopérer existaient déjà, comme en Colombie-Britannique, mais n'a guère encouragé ni provoqué de coalitions en Alberta ni au Manitoba. En définitive, la différence avec le système majoritaire uninominal a été négligeable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 647 - 669
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberta. Chief Electoral Officer. 1983. A Report on Alberta Elections, 1905–1982. Edmonton: Chief Electoral Officer.
Australia. Australian Electoral Commission. 2002. Voter turnout 1901–2001 (National Summary). http://www.aec.gov.au/_content/what/voting/turnout.htm (June 9, 2003).
Australian Government & Politics. 2003. http://elections.uwa.edu.au (June 9, 2003).
Bean, Clive. 1997. “Australia's Experience with the Alternative Vote.” Representation 34: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Scott. 1996. Winning and Losing: Australian National Elections. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
Bilodeau, Antoine. 1999. “L'impact mécanique du vote alternatif au Canada: une simulation des élections de 1997.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 32: 745–761.Google Scholar
Blais, André and Agnieszka Dobrzynska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André and Louis Massicotte. 2002. “ Electoral Systems.” In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, ed. Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris. London: Sage.
British Columbia. Elections BC. 1988. Electoral History of British Columbia 1871–1986. Victoria: Elections BC.
Courtney, John C. 1999. “Plurality-majority Electoral Systems: A review.” Electoral Insight, vol. 1. no. 1: 7–11.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Helen Margetts. 1999. “Mixed Electoral Systems in Britain and the Jenkins Commission on Electoral Reform.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1: 12–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1951. “The Impact of Electoral Systems on Political Life.” International Social Science Journal 3: 314–352.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1964. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. 3rd. ed., trans. Barbara and Robert North. London: Methuen.
Elkins, David J. 1976. “Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows: The B.C. Party System in the 1952 and 1953 Provincial Elections.” BC Studies 30: 3–26.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave.
Flanagan, Tom. 1999. “ The Alternative Vote: An Electoral System for Canada.” In Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada's Electoral System, ed. Henry Milner. Peterborough: Broadview.
Franklin, Mark N. 2002. “ The Dynamics of Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, ed. Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gallagher, Michael. 1978. “Party Solidarity, Exclusivity, and Inter-party Relationships in Ireland, 1922–1977: The Evidence of Transfers.” Economic and Social Review 10: 1–22.Google Scholar
Hesketh, Bob. 1987. “The abolition of preferential voting in Alberta.” Prairie Forum 12: 123–143.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jansen, Harold J. 1998. “The Single Transferable Vote in Alberta and Manitoba.” Doctoral dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Johnston, J. Paul. 1992. “The Single Transferable Vote in Alberta Provincial Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Disproportionality Under Alternative Voting: The Crucial—and Puzzling—Case of the Australian Senate Elections, 1919–1946.” Acta Politica 32: 9–24.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian and Toni Makkai. 1993. “Institutions, Society, or Protest? Explaining Invalid Votes in Australian Elections.” Electoral Studies 12: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manitoba. Chief Electoral Officer. 1986. Statement of Votes: Thirty-Third Provincial General Election March 18, 1986. Manitoba: Chief Electoral Officer.
Massicotte, Louis and André Blais. 1999. “Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Suvey.” Electoral Studies 18: 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Jeremy and Campbell Sharman. 2003. “ Western Australia.” In Australian Politics and Government: The Commonwealth, the States, and the Territories, ed. Jeremy Moon and Campbell Sharman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Punnett, R.M. 1987. “The Alternative Vote with the Optional Use of Preferences: Some Irish Lessons for Britain and Australia.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 25: 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas M. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. Revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Reilly, Ben. 1997. “The Alternative Vote and Ethnic Accommodation: New Evidence from Papua New Guinea.” Electoral Studies 16: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin. 2001a. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, Ben. 2001b. “ Preferential voting and its political consequences.” In Elections: Full, Free & Fair, ed. Marian Sawer. Sydney: Federation Press.
Reilly, Ben and Michael Maley. 2000. “ The Single Transferable Vote and the Alternative Vote Compared.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. Shaun Bowler and Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rydon, Joan. 1989. “Two- and Three-Party Electoral Politics in Britain, Australia and New Zealand.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 27: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saskatchewan. Chief Electoral Office. 1983. Provincial Elections in Saskatchewan, 1905–1983. Regina: Chief Electoral Office.
Sharman, C., A. Sayers and N. Miragliotta. 2002. “Trading party preferences: the Australian experience of preferential voting.” Electoral Studies 21: 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey. 2001. The Friendly Dictatorship. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Smith, Rodney. 2003. “ New South Wales.” In Australian Politics and Government: The Commonwealth, the States, and the Territories, ed. Jeremy Moon and Campbell Sharman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taagepera, Rein and Bernard Grofman. 1985. “Rethinking Duverger's Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems—Parties Minus Issues Equals One.” European Journal of Political Research 13: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1989. Seats & Votes: The Effects & Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wanna, John. 2003. “ Queensland.” In Australian Politics and Government: The Commonwealth, the States, and the Territories, ed. Jeremy Moon and Campbell Sharman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.