Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:09:26.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problems of Governing Federal Capitals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Donald C. Rowat
Donald C. Rowat
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 345 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The number of countries which can be identified as federations depends on the definition used. For purposes of this paper seventeen states are classed as federations. They are: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Cameroun, Canada, India, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Switzerland, USA, USSR, Venezuela, West Germany, and Yugoslavia.

2 Those who are not fully aware of the numerous difficulties since Confederation caused by divided jurisdiction over the Ottawa area should read Eggleston's, Wilfred excellent history, The Queen's Choice (Ottawa, 1961).Google Scholar For the most recent period see my own report, “The Proposal for a Federal Territory for Canada's Capital,” in Ontario Advisory Committee on Confederation, Background Papers and Reports (Toronto, 1967), 215–82.Google ScholarPubMed

3 McRae, Kenneth D., Switzerland: Example of Cultural Coexistence (Toronto, 1964), 68.Google Scholar

4 Flaherty, Frank, “Gift Suggestion for Canada's 100th Birthday: Make Ottawa Our 11th Province,” Weekend Magazine (June 29, 1963), 1–4, 23Google Scholar; see also Kear, A. R., “Provincial Status for the National Capital Region,” a brief to the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, Aug. 19, 1964, pp. 16Google Scholar mimeo.

5 See Miller, J. D., “Self-Government for Canberra?” Public Administration (Australia), 26 (Sept. 1967), 218–26Google Scholar; also, Australia Ministry of Interior, Self-Government for the Australian Capital Territory: A Preliminary Assessment May 1967 (Canberra, 1967).Google Scholar

6 See my suggestion of this kind of arrangement for Ottawa in “The Proposal for a Federal Territory for Canada's Capital,” 268–74.

7 Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, Report: Book I, The Official Languages (Ottawa, 1967), 119.

8 Ibid., 117.

9 Ottawa Journal, Feb. 1, 1968.