Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:02:56.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Reply to Flanagan's Comments: “The Sovereignty and Nationhood of Canadian Indians: A Comment on Boldt and Long”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Menno Boldt
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
J. Anthony Long
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment/Commentaire
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Flanagan, Thomas, “The Sovereignty and Nationhood of Canadian Indians: A Comment on Boldt and Long,” this JOURNAL 18 (1985), 371Google Scholar. See, Boldt, Menno and Long, J. Anthony, “Tribal Traditions and European-Western Political Ideologies: The Dilemma of Canada's Native Groups,” this JOURNAL 17 (1984), 537–53Google Scholar.

2 See Dyke, Vernon Van, “Human Rights and the Rights of Groups,” American Journal of Political Science 18 (1974), 725–41;CrossRefGoogle Scholar“Justice as Fairness: For Groups?” American Political Science Review 69 (1975), 607–14;CrossRefGoogle Scholar“The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory,” World Politics 29 (1977), 343–69;CrossRefGoogle Scholar“Collective Entities and Moral Rights: Problems in Liberal-Democratic Thought,” Journal of Politics 44 (1982), 2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Flanagan, , “The Sovereignty and Nationhood of Canadian Indians,” 371Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., 373.

5 Ibid., 373–373.

6 Ibid., 370.