Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:53:39.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic Debt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2008

Carla Norrlöf
Carla Norrlöf*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Carla Norrlöf, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5S 3G3, carla.norrlof@utoronto.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Accumulating debt is usually harmful for states, but a cyclical deficit policy and large-scale borrowing have been beneficial for the United States. While structural changes in the international political economy may cap America's future ability to process debt, an empirical analysis of the economic dimensions of hegemony over the last quarter century shows unambiguously that the hegemon reaps disproportionate gains in the area of trade and investment. This finding provides new insight on whether it is advantageous to be a hegemon.

Résumé. Les États pâtissent généralement de l'accumulation des dettes, mais une politique de déficit cyclique et le recours à de larges emprunts ont pourtant été bénéfiques aux États-Unis. La capacité future de la puissance américaine à gérer sa dette sera peut-être entamée par les changements structurels subis par l'économie politique mondiale. Toutefois, l'analyse empirique des dimensions économiques de la situation d'hégémonie durant les vingt-cinq dernières années met à jour, et sans ambiguïté aucune, les gains disproportionnés générés par l'hégémon dans les domaines du commerce et de l'investissement. Cette recherche apporte un éclairage nouveau au débat sur les avantages liés à la position d'hégémon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 411 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BEA (US Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2007a. Balance of Payments: Table 1. US International Transactions. Washington, DC: Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar
BEA (US Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2007b. Current-dollar and “Real” GDP. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
BEA (US Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2007c. Table 2. International Investment Position of the United States at Yearend, 1976–2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Bergsten, Fred C. 1975. The Dilemmas of the Dollar. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
BIS (Bank for International Settlements). 2005. Triennial Central Bank Survey: Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity in 2004. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Brawley, Mark. 1995. “Political Leadership and Liberal Economic Subsystems: The Constraints of Structural Assumptions.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, Michele. 2004. “Exchange Rate Movements and the US International Balance Sheet.” FRBSF Economic Letter 25.Google Scholar
CBO (Congressional Budget Office). 2005. Why Does US Investment Abroad Earn Higher Returns than Foreign Investment in the United States? Washington, DC: Economic and Budget Issue Brief.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie and Frankel, Jeffrey. 2005. “Will the Euro Eventually Surpass the Dollar as Leading International Reserve Currency?” National Bureau of Economic Research 11510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, William R. 2005. The United States as a Debtor Nation. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 1977. Organizing the World's Money: The Political Economy of International Monetary Relations. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin. 2003. “Global Currency Rivalry: Can the Euro Ever Challenge the Dollar?” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (4): 575–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Despres, Michael P., Kindleberger, Charles P and Salant, Walter. 1966. “The Dollar and World Liquidity: A Minority View.” The Economist, February 5.Google Scholar
DFAIT (Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada). 2006. Investment Income. Ottawa: Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada.Google Scholar
ECB (European Central Bank). 2005. Review of the International Role of the Euro. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
Funabashi, Yoichi. 1988. Managing the Dollar: From Plaza to the Louvre. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rey, Hélène. 2005. “From World Banker to World Venture Capitalist: US External Adjustment and the Exorbitant Privilege.” NBER Working Paper 11563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, H. Peter. 2004. The Exhaustion of the Dollar. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jason and Hawkins, John. 2007. How International Investment Income Flows Affect Australia's Balance of Payments.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Philipp and Issing, Otmar. 2002. “The International Role of the Euro.” Journal of Policy Modeling 24 (4):315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2005. Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
IMF. 2008. International Financial Statistics. Washington D.C.: IMF.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression 1929–1939. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1981. “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy.” International Studies Quarterly 25: 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouparitsas, Michael. 2005. “Is the U.S. current account sustainable?” Chicago Fed Letter, June.Google Scholar
Lane, Philip R. and Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria. 2002. “The External Wealth of Nations: Measures of Foreign Assets and Liabilities for Industrial and Developing Countries.” Journal of International Economics 55: 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Philip R. and Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria. 2006. “The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2004.” In IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Looney, Robert. 2004. “Petroeuros: A Threat to US Interests in the Gulf?” Middle East Policy 11 (1):26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Ronald. 2001. “The International Dollar Standard and Sustainability of the US Current Account Deficit.” Paper presented at the Brookings Panel on Economic Activity: Symposium on the US Current Account.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, Maurice and Rogoff, Kenneth. 2005. The Unsustainable Current Account Position Revisited. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research 10869.Google Scholar
ONS (Office for National Statistics). 2006a. “Amendment United Kingdom National Accounts:” The Blue Book 2006. London: National Statistics.Google Scholar
ONS (Office for National Statistics). 2006b. United Kingdom Balance of Payments: The Pink Book 2006. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Setser, Brad and Roubini, Nouriel. 2005. “How Scary is the Deficit?” Foreign Affairs July/August.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory.” International Organization 39 (4):580–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statcan. 2006a. Canada's International Investment Position: Canada's National Statistical Agency. http://www40.statcan.ca/101/cst01/econ08.htm [accessed July 2007].Google Scholar
Statcan. 2006b. Canada's Population Clock. Statistics Canada. ⟨http://www.statcan.ca/english/edu/clock/population.htm⟩. [accessed July 2007]Google Scholar
Tille, Cédric. 2003. “The Impact of Exchange Rate Movements on US Foreign Debt.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance 9 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
USCB. 2006. US and World Population Clocks. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar