No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
The article is an effort to think through the relation between the language of values, values education, and technology. It links Nietzsche's account of nihilism as the cognitive effort to create the illusion of adaptation and mastery of what is contingent and spontaneous and the process by which these life-denying values cause themselves to be devalued with a consideration of how psychology is turned to adjusting individuals and populations to the efficient securing of technological processes. George Grant's writings are employed as the vehicle of access to these reflections.
L'article tente d'explorer la relation qui existe entre le discours des valeurs, l'apprentissage aux valeurs et la technologie. II tente de lier ce que Nietzsche entendait par le nihilisme, c'est-à-dire l'effort cognitif cherchant à creér l'illusion d'adaptation et de maîtrise de ce qui est contingent et spontané et le processus par lequel ces valeurs contraignantes se dévaluent elles-mêmes, en considerant la façon par laquelle la psychologie tente d'adapter les individus et les populations à la reproduction efficace des processus technologiques. Les écrits de George Grant servent à comprendre ces réflexions.
1 Baier, Kurt and Rescher, Nicholas (eds.), Values and the Future: The Impact of Technological Change on American Values (New York: Free Press, 1969), v.Google Scholar
2 Ibid.
3 There are essentially four models of values education being used in North America today, although there are numerous variations. The dominant four are “values analysis” (for example, Association of Values Education and Research, University of British Columbia), “Kohlberg's values development,” “values reflection” (for example, Clive Beck, Ontario Institute of Education), and “values clarification.” See also, Superka, Douglas et al., Values Education Sourcebook: Conceptual Approaches, Materials Analyses, and an Annotated Bibliography (Boulder, Colorado: Social Science Education Consortium and ERIC/Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, 1976)Google Scholar and Barrs, S. et al., Values Education: A Resource Booklet (Toronto: Professional Development Committee of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation, 1975).Google Scholar
4 Beck, Clive, Moral Education in the Schools (Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Fromm, Erich, Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics (New York: Rinehart, 1947), viii.Google Scholar
6 Powell, John, Why Am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am? (New York: Argus, 1969), 9.Google Scholar
7 Grant, George, Technology and Justice (Toronto: Anansi, 1986), 9.Google Scholar
8 This point is developed with great clarity in Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), esp. part 6, 248–325.Google Scholar
9 This point is drawn from the more fully developed argument of Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (New York: Vintage, 1973), particularly chapters 9 and 10.Google Scholar
10 Grant, Technology and Justice, 32.
11 Grant, George, Time as History (Toronto: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 1969), 41.Google Scholar
12 The term “psy-complex” comes from Donzelot, Jacques, The Policing of Families (New York: Pantheon, 1979)Google Scholar and L'Invention du Social (Paris: Fayard, 1984)Google Scholar. For an application of Donzelot's ideas, see Rose, Nikolas, “The Psychological Complex: Mental Measurement and Social Administration,” Ideology and Consciousness 5 (1979), 5–68.Google Scholar
13 George Grant, “Knowing and Making,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 4th Series, 12:67.
14 Grant, George, English-Speaking Justice (Sackville, NB: Mount Allison University, 1974), 91.Google Scholar
15 Grant, “Knowing and Making,” 65.
16 Grant, George, Philosophy in the Mass Age (Toronto: Copp Clark, 1959), 84–85.Google Scholar
17 For an excellent discussion of the core of “values speech,” see Andrew, Ed, “Pierre Trudeau on the Language of Values and the Value of Languages,” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 6 (1982), 143–59.Google Scholar
18 Grant, English-Speaking Justice, 10.
19 Sartre, Jean-Paul, Being and Nothingness, trans. by Barnes, Hazel (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956), 691.Google Scholar
20 Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, First Part, in The Portable Nietzsche, trans. and ed. by Kaufmann, Walter (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), 139.Google Scholar
21 Heidegger, Martin, “Letter on Humanism,” in Martin Heidegger, Basic Writings (London: Harper and Row, 1977), 210Google Scholar; Foucault, The Order of Things, 310.
22 Kolb, David, The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar
23 Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Will to Power, trans. by Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Vintage, 1968), 380.Google Scholar
24 Grant, Technology and Justice, 119.
25 Turner, Francis, “Values and the Social Worker,” in Meyer, John (ed.), Reflections on Values Education (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1976), 208.Google Scholar
26 “The University Curriculum and the Technological Threat,” in The Sciences, the Humanities, and the Technological Threat (London: University of London Press, 1977), 24.Google Scholar
27 The distinction between “juridical” and “disciplinary” power comes, of course, from Foucault, Michel. See his Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Pantheon Books, 1977).Google Scholar
28 Grant, Time as History, 48; quoting Strauss.
29 Grant, “A Platitude,” Technology and Empire, 143.
30 Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans, by Lovitt, William (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), 33, 48.Google Scholar