Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:56:19.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was Bentham a Utilitarian?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2005

Max Hocutt
Max Hocutt
Affiliation:
The University of Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Utilitarianism is usually defined as the doctrine that morally right and legally just conduct maximizes the good for the most people, and this doctrine is usually criticized on the grounds that it licenses conduct known by other means to be wrong or unjust. Yet Jeremy Bentham, the historical prototype of a utilitarian, maintained that individuals ought to do only what promises to serve their personal interests, and he offered utility as the test not of what is right or just but of what ought to be made so by instituting better rules. Textbook utilitarianism is a better fit for the “theological utilitarians” William Paley and Henry Sidgwick.

Résumé. On définit d'habitude l'utilitarisme comme la doctrine prétendant qu'une conduite moralement bonne et légalement juste concourt au bien du plus grand nombre de personnes; en général, cette doctrine est critiquée parce qu'elle permet des conduites dont on sait, par d'autres moyens, qu'elles sont mauvaises ou injustes. Pourtant, Jeremy Bentham, le prototype historique de l'utilitariste, prétendait que l'individu se devait de faire seulement ce qui servait ses propres intérêts, et il présentait l'utilité comme le test non de ce qui est bon ou juste mais de ce qui devrait le devenir par l'institution de meilleures règles. L'utilitarisme des manuels décrit mieux les “ utilitaristes théologiens ” William Paley et Henry Sidgwick.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 697 - 717
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G.E.M. 2002. “Modern Moral Theory.” In Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues, 2nd edition, eds. Steven M. Cahn and Peter Markie. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, Charles Milner. 1905. Jeremy Bentham: His Life and Work. London: Methuen.
Austin, John. 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Wilfred E. Rumble. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beattie, F.R. 1885. An Examination of the Utilitarian Theory of Morals. Brantford, ON: Brantford.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. Of Laws in General, ed. H.L.A. Hart. University of London: Athlone Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1983. Deontology together with A Table of the Springs of Action and The Article on Utilitarianism, ed. Amnon Goldworth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1988. A Fragment on Government, eds. J. H .Burns and H.L.A. Hart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1988. The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. This is evidently a photocopy of the older Hafner edition.
Crimmins, James E. 1990. Secular Utilitarianism: Social Science and the Critique of Religion in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelmann, Stephen G. 2003. Imagining Interest in Political Thought: Origins of Economic Rationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Everett, Charles Warren. 1945. “Editor's Introduction.” In The Limits of Jurisprudence Defined, eds. Jeremy Bentham, Charles Warren Everett. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harrison, Ross. 1983. Bentham. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hart, H.L.A. 1982. Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hocutt, Max. 2000. Grounded Ethics: The Empirical Bases of Normative Judgments. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Lyons, David. 1991. In the Interest of the Governed: A Study of Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law, revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, David. 2001. “Utilitarianism.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition, eds. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker. New York: Routledge, pp. 1737–1744.
Narveson, Jan. 1967. Morality and Utility. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Noonan, Richard. 1983. The Moral Philosophers, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Olson, Robert G. 1978. Ethics: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
Rachels, James, ed. 1999. The Right Thing to Do, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: McGraw Hill.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sidgwick, Henry. 1981. Methods of Ethics, 7th edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Williams, Bernard. 1972. Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Harper & Row.