Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:18:52.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“We are Not an Ethnic Vote!” Representational Perspectives of Minorities in the Greater Toronto Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2015

Karen Bird
Karen Bird*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
*
Department of Political Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, kbird@mcmaster.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the representational preferences of the represented, a perspective which has been largely neglected by political scientists in Canada. Using focus group interviews, I assess views of representation among three visible minority communities—black, South Asian and Chinese—within the urban and highly diverse setting of the Greater Toronto Area. Applying Hanna Pitkin's classic conceptual framework, I probe the multiple dimensions of political representation, examining the relative importance of its formal, descriptive, substantive and symbolic elements from minorities' perspective. Drawing on more recent advances in representational theory, I examine how minorities evaluate political actors' claims to represent them, and look at the “mobilizing objections” citizens raise in the face of such claims. Finally, I compare the three communities to assess similarities and differences in perceptions of representation along its various dimensions.

Résumé

Cet article se penche sur les préférences représentationnelles des personnes représentées politiquement, une perspective souvent négligée par les politologues canadiens. Me basant sur les données obtenues au cours de groupes de discussion, j’évalue les perspectives représentationnelles de trois groupes minoritaires – les communautés noire, chinoise et asiatique du sud – issues de la grande région de Toronto où cohabitent de nombreuses ethnicités. L'article examine, en s'appuyant sur le cadre conceptuel classique de Hanna Pitkin, la multiplicité des représentations politiques et se concentre sur l'importance relative des éléments formels, substantifs, descriptifs et symboliques du point de vue des minorités. De plus j'analyse, en m'appuyant sur les récents progrès sur la théorie de la représentation, comment les minorités évaluent les affirmations des politiciens sur ce qui touche leur représentation, ainsi que les ‘objections mobilisatrices’ que ces citoyens soulèvent envers de telles affirmations. Enfin, j'essaie d’évaluer si des différences perceptuelles vis-à-vis de la représentation existent dans ces trois communautés.

Type
Immigration and Identity Politics in Canada
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 249 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, Robert. 2003. “What Might it Mean to be an ‘Interpretivist’?” Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 1 (2): 16–18. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/cqrm/Newsletter1.2.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cameron D. and Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2005. “Conceptions of Political Representation in Canada: An Explanation of Public Opinion.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 1029–58.Google Scholar
Bastedo, Heather. 2012. They Don't Stand for Me. Generational Difference in Voter Motivation and the Importance of Symbolic Representation in Youth Voter Turnout. Doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Bilodeau, Antoine. 2014. “Is Democracy the Only Game in Town? Tension between Immigrants' Democratic Desires and Authoritarian Imprints.” Democratization 21 (2): 359–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2011. “Patterns of Substantive Representation among Visible Minority MPs: Evidence from Canada's House of Commons.” In The Political Representation of Immigrants and Minorities: Voters, Parties and Parliaments in Liberal Democracies, ed. Bird, Karen, Saalfeld, Thomas and Wüst, Andreas M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blidook, Kelly. 2012. Constituency Influence in Parliament: Countering the Centre. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Blidook, Kelly. 2014. “Democratic Responsiveness in the House of Commons.” In Canadian Democracy From the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance, ed. Gidengil, Elisabeth and Bastedo, Heather. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence and Gilliam, Franklin D. Jr. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 377–393.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks' Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.Google Scholar
Carman, Christopher Jan. 2007. “Assessing Preferences for Political Representation in the US.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 17 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Dario and Warren, Mark E.. 2006. “Rethinking Democratic Representation: Eight Theoretical Issues.” Paper presented at Rethinking Democratic Representation, Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia, May, 18–19, 2006. http://www.politics.ubc.ca/fileadmin/user_upload/poli_sci/Faculty/warren/Rethinking_Democratic_Representation_May_2006.pdf (accessed 29 December 2014).Google Scholar
Collet, Christian. 2008. “Minority Candidates, Alternative Media, and Multiethnic America: Deracialization or Toggling?” Perspectives on Politics 6 (4): 707–28.Google Scholar
Colour of Poverty—Colour of Change. 2011. “Go Ethnics Go!?!?” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5UE0SgN5ic (accessed December 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Coyne, Andrew. 2010. “Parliament: Who needs it?” Maclean's, January 10, www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/01/parliament-who-needs-it (accessed 29 December 2014).Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, David C. 1997. Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa: Life in the House of Commons. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eagles, Munroe. 1998. “The Political Ecology of Representation in English Canada: MPs and their Constituencies.” American Review of Canadian Studies 28 (1-2): 53–79.Google Scholar
Eagles, Munroe, Koop, Royce and Loat, Alison. 2014. “MPs on the Home Front: How Constituency Characteristics Influence Representational Approaches.” In Canadian Democracy From the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance, ed. Gidengil, Elisabeth and Bastedo, Heather. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Franks, C.E.S. 2007. “Members and Constituency Roles in the Canadian Federal System.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (1): 23–45.Google Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within US House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–33.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, John D. and Keane, Michael. 2006. “Descriptive Representation and the Composition of African American Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 998–1012.Google Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2005. “Disentangling Constituency and Legislator Effects in Legislative Representation: Black Legislators or Black Districts?” Social Science Quarterly 86 (2): 427–43.Google Scholar
Grose, Christian R., Mangum, Maurice and Martin, Christopher. 2007. “Race, Political Empowerment, and Constituency Service: Descriptive Representation and the Hiring of African-American Congressional Staff.” Polity 39 (4): 449–78.Google Scholar
Haynie, Kerry L. 2001. African American Legislators in the American States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heitshusen, Valerie, Young, Garry and Wood, David M.. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney and Tolbert, Caroline. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the US House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 640–52.Google Scholar
Hollander, Jocelyn A. 2004. “The Social Contexts of Focus Groups.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33 (5): 602–37.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2012. “Party Constituency Associations and the Service, Policy and Symbolic Responsiveness of Canadian Members of Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loat, Alison and MacMillan, Michael. 2014. Tragedy in the Commons: Former Members of Parliament Speak Out about Canada's Failing Democracy. Toronto: Random House of Canada.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Peter. 2014. “The Constituency Project Ten Years On.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 37 (2): 36–39.Google Scholar
Megyery, Kathy, ed. 1996. Ethno-Cultural Groups and Visible Minorities in Canadian Politics: The Question of Access. Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing: vol. 7. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Owens, Chris T. 2005. “Black Substantive Representation in State Legislatures from 1971-1999.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (5): 779–91.Google Scholar
Pantoja, Adrian and Segura, Gary. 2003. “Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation among Latinos.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (2): 441–60.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew, 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. “The Conditional Effects of Minority Descriptive Representation: Black Legislators and Policy Influence in the American States.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 585–99.Google Scholar
Rocha, Rene R., Tolbert, Caroline J., Bowen, Daniel C. and Clark, Christopher J.. 2010. “Race and Turnout: Does Descriptive Representation in State Legislatures Increase Minority Voting?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 890–907.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2009. “Authorization and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemiatycki, Myer. 2011. “The Diversity Gap. The Electoral Under-Representation of Visible Minorities.” DiverseCity: The Greater Toronto Leadership Project. http://diversecitytoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Final-Report.pdf (accessed 29 December 2014).Google Scholar
Siemiatycki, Myer and Matheson, Andrew. 2005. “Suburban Success: Immigrant and Minority Electoral Gains in Suburban Toronto.” Canadian Issues / Thèmes canadiens: Newcomers, Minorities and Political Participation in Canada Summer 2005: 69-72.Google Scholar
Somani, Alia. 2011. “The Apology and its Aftermath: National Atonement or the Management of Minorities?” Postcolonial Text 6 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., Johnston, Richard and Banting, Keith. 2007. “Ties that Bind? Social Cohesion and Diversity in Canada.” In The Art of the State III: Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Belonging in Canada, ed. Banting, Keith, Courchene, Thomas J. and Seidle, F. Leslie. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, Penner, Erin and Blidook, Kelly. 2009. “Constituency Influence in Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 563–91.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. 2006. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress, enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2004. Black Faces in the Mirror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1992. “The Effects of Race and Gender on Constituency Service.” The Western Political Quarterly 45 (1): 169–80.Google Scholar
Trebbi, Francesca, Aghion, Philippe and Alesina, Alberto. 2008. “Electoral Rules and Minority Representation in US Cities.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 325–57.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–65.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia and Warren, Mark E.. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policy-making.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 132–54.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora. 2006. “Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, ed. Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar