Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:14:48.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Targeting Social Support: A Network Assessment of the Convoy Model of Social Support

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Valerie A. Haines  and
Linda J. Henderson
Valerie A. Haines*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Linda J. Henderson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
Requests, etc., Valerie A. Haines, Department of Sociology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4. Email: haines@ucalgary.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most influential applications of the concepts, methods and measures of social network analysis to the study of the social support transactions of older adults is the convoy model of social support. We draw on recent debates in network methodology to provide an assessment of the convoy model that explores the role of weak ties in the support networks of older adults. The social networks generated by the target diagram which operationalizes the convoy model display the structural and functional characteristics set out in its theoretical arguments. But not all of the ties constituting these networks are conduits of social support and, more importantly, these social networks do not include all supporting and supported others. The target diagram identifies core support networks; therefore, support flowing through weak ties is missed when it is used to set the boundaries of support networks. Expanding our picture of the support networks of older adults to take systematic account of weak ties and the emotional aid, instrumental assistance, and companionship that flow through them will enhance the effectiveness of support interventions that target older adults.

Résumé

Une des applications les plus signifiantes des concepts, des méthodes et des mesures de l'analyse du réseau social à l'étude des transactions de soutien social sur les aîné(e)s repose sur le modèle de convoi du soutien social. Nous avons examiné des bases de données récentes en méthodologie de réseau et tenté de présenter une évaluation du modèle de convoi qui explore le rôle des maillons faibles des réseaux de soutien des aîné(e)s. Les réseaux sociaux engendrés par le diagramme des objectifs qui régit le modèle de convoi exposent les caractéristiques structurelles et fonctionnelles constituant les arguments théoriques. Mais ce ne sont pas tous les maillons des réseaux qui constituent des canaux de soutien social et, dans une mesure plus importante encore, les réseaux sociaux n'incluent pas tous les intervenant(e)s, aidant(e)s et aidés. Le diagramme des objectifs présente les réseaux de soutient principaux; par conséquent, l'appui qui se transmet par des maillons faibles n'est pas pris en compte dans sa fonction délimitante des réseaux de soutien. Si nous agrandissons l'angle du tableau des réseaux de soutien des aîné(e)s pour prendre systématiquement en compte les maillons faibles et l'aide émotive, l'assistance déterminante et la camaraderie qui s'y rattachent, nous obtenons une image renforcée de l'efficacité des interventions d'appui au aîné(e)s.

Keywords

Convoy ModelSocial SupportSocial NetworksWeak TiesModèle du convoisoutien socialréseaux sociauxmaillons faibles
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Summer/Été 2002 , pp. 243 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*Names are listed alphabetically. We would like to thank Patricia McBride for her participation in the design and data collection phases of this research and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This research was supported by a grant from The University of Calgary awarded to Valerie Haines.

References

Adelman, M.B., Parks, M.R., & Albrecht, T.L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In Albrecht, T.L. & Adelman, M.B. (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 126–147). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonucci, T.C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In Binstock, R.H. & George, L.K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed.) (pp. 205–226). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T.C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life: A preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beggs, J.J., Haines, V.A., & Hurlbert, J.S. (1996a). Situational contingencies surrounding the receipt of informal support. Social Forces, 75, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggs, J.J., Haines, V.A., & Hurlbert, J.S. (1996b). Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmet-ropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural Sociology, 61, 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H.R., Johnsen, E.C., Killworth, P.D., McMarthy, C., Shelley, G.A., & Robinson, S. (1990). Comparing four different methods for measuring personal networks. Social Networks, 12, 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1985). Health and social support of older adults in the community. Canadian Journal on Aging, 4, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R.S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6, 293–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K.E., & Lee, B.A. (1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K.E., Marsden, P.V., & Hurlbert, J.S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, M.H. (1979). Neighbors and friends: An overlooked resource in the informal support system. Research on Aging, 1, 434–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, A., & Norris, J.E. (1998). Social networks and exchange norms across the adult life-span. Canadian Journal on Aging, 17, 212–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, K.L., & Griffiths, P.C. (1999). Season's greetings: Adults' social contacts at the holiday season. Psychology and Aging, 14, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, C.S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L.C., & Thompson, C.R. (1989). Estimating acquaintanceship volume. In Kochen, M. (Ed.) The small world (pp. 147–158). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B.H. (1992). Quandaries in translating support concepts to intervention. In Viel, H.O.F. & Baumann, U. (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 293–309). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–%1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M.S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M.S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Marsden, P.V. & Lin, N. (Eds.), Social structure and analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Hagan, J.M. (1998). Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints. American Sociological Review, 63, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, V.A., & Hurlbert, J.S. (1992). Network range and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines, V.A., Hurlbert, J.S., & Beggs, J.J. (1996). Exploring the determinants of support provision: Provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts and support following life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 252–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammer, M. (1983). ‘Core’ and ‘extended’ social networks in relation to health and illness. Social Science and Medicine, 17, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, K., Thompson, M.G., Vlachos-Weber, I., Steffen, A.M., & Trueba, P.E. (1991a). Peer support telephone dyads for elderly women: Was this the wrong intervention? American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, K., Thompson, M.G., Vlachos-Weber, I., Steffen, A.M., & Trueba, P.E. (1991b). Support interventions for older adults: Confidant relationships, perceived family support, and meaningful role activity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R.L. (1979). Aging and social support. In Riley, M. W. (Ed.), Aging from birth to death: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 77–91). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, R.L., & Antonucci, T.C. (1980). “Convoys over the life course: Attachments, roles and social support.” Life-Span Development and Behavior, 3, pp. 253–286.Google Scholar
Kahn, R.L., & Antonucci, T.C. (1981). Convoys of social support: A life-course approach. In Keisler, S.B., Morgan, J.N. & Oppenheimer, V.K. (Eds.), Aging: Social change (pp. 383–405). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Killworth, P.D., Johnsen, E.C., Bernard, H.R., Shelley, G.A., & McCarty, C. (1990). Estimating the size of personal networks. Social Networks, 12, 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N., & Ensel, W.M. (1989). Life stress and health: Stressors and resources. American Sociological Review, 54, 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N., Woelfel, M.W., & Light, S.C. (1985). The buffering effect of social support subsequent to an important life event. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the Elderly. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, P.V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, P.V. (1992). Social network theory. In Borgatta, E.F. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (Vol. 4, pp. 1887–1894). Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marsden, P.V., & Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D.L., Carder, P., & Neal, M.B. (1997). Are some relationships more useful than others? The value of similar others in the networks of recent widows. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 745–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescosolido, B.A. (1991). Illness careers and network ties: A conceptual model of utilization and compliance. In Albrecht, G. & Levy, J. (Eds.), Advances in Medical Sociology (pp. 161–184). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Podolny, J.N., & Baron, J.N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Lovin, L., & McPherson, J.M. (1993). You are who you know: A network approach to gender. In England, P. (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 223–251). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Social Networks in Adult Life, Principal Questionnaire, . (1980). Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Project 34 (462193).Google Scholar
Suitor, J.J., & Keeton, S. (1997). Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women's support networks across a decade. Social Networks, 19, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suitor, J.J., Pillemer, K., & Keeton, S. (1995). When experience counts: The effects of experiential and structural similarity on patterns of support and interpersonal stress. Social Forces, 73, 1573–%1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suitor, J.J., Wellman, B., & Morgan, D.L. (1997). It's about time: How, why, and when networks change. Social Networks, 19, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoits, P.A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Sonderen, E., Ormel, J., Brilman, E., & van Linden, C. (1990). Personal network delineation: A comparison of the exchange, affective, and role-relation approaches. In Knipscheer, K.C.P.M. & Antonucci, T.C. (Eds.), Social network research: Substantive issues and methodological questions (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Walker, M.E., Wasserman, S., & Wellman, B. (1993). Statistical models for social support networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks provide what kinds of social support, Advances in Group Processes, 9, 207–235.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., & Wellman, B. (1992). Domestic affairs and network relations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., Wong, R.Y., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar