Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:30:13.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flow Experience in the Daily Lives of Older Adults: An Analysis of the Interaction between Flow, Individual Differences, Serious Leisure, Location, and Social Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2010

Jinmoo Heo ,
Youngkhill Lee ,
Paul M. Pedersen  and
Bryan P. McCormick
Jinmoo Heo*
Affiliation:
Department of Tourism, Conventions, and Event Management, Indiana University–Indianapolis
Youngkhill Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Dance & Sport, Calvin College
Paul M. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University – Bloomington
Bryan P. McCormick
Affiliation:
Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Studies, Indiana University – Bloomington
*
*Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Jinmoo Heo, Ph.D. Department of Tourism, Conventions, and Event Management Indiana University–Indianapolis 901 W. New York St. PE258G Indianapolis, IN 46202 (jheo@indiana.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined how serious leisure, individual differences, social context, and location contribute to older adults’ experiences of flow – an intense psychological state – in their daily lives. The Experience Sampling Method was used with 19 older adults in a Midwestern city in the United States. Experience of flow was the outcome measure, and the data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling. Results indicated that location and employment status influenced the subjects’ flow experience. Furthermore, the findings revealed that retirement was negatively related to experiencing flow, and there was a significant association between home and the flow experience. The results of this study enhance the understanding of flow experiences in the everyday lives of older adults.

Résumé

Cette étude a examiné comment les loisirs sérieux, les différences individuelles, le contexte social et l’emplacement contribuent aux expériences de flux – un état psychologique intense – dans la vie quotidienne des adultes plus âgés. La Méthode d’échantillonnage a été utilisée avec 19 adultes plus âgés dans une ville du Midwest des États-Unis. L’expérience de flux a été la mesure des résultats, et les données ont été analysées à l’aide de la modélisation linéaire hiérarchique. Les résultats ont indiqué que la localité et le statut de l’emploi ont influencé l’expérience de flux des sujets. En outre, les conclusions ont révélé que la retraite était négativement liée à la rencontre de flux, et qu’il y avait une association significative entre le domicile et l’expérience de flux. Les résultats de cette étude améliorent la compréhension des expériences de flux dans la vie quotidienne des adultes plus âgés.

Keywords

loisirs sérieuxfluxadultes plus âgésserious leisureflowolder adults
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 411 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borrell, K. (1998). Using the experience sampling method in gerontological social work. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 30(3/4), 183–189.Google Scholar
Brown, C. A., McGuire, F. A., & Voelkl, J. (2008). The link between successful aging and serious leisure. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryce, J., & Haworth, J. (2002). Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure Studies, 21, 249–263.Google Scholar
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burch, W.R., & Hamilton-Smith, E. (1991). Mapping a new frontier: Identifying, measuring, and valuing social cohesion benefits related to nonwork opportunities and activities. In Driver, B.L., Brown, P.J. & Peterson, G.L. (Eds.), Benefits of leisure (pp. 369–382). State College, PA: Venture.Google Scholar
Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Comparison of Italian and U.S. students. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 288–306). New York: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992a). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992b). A response to the Kimiecik and Stein & Jackson papers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4, 181–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.Google Scholar
Debats, D.L., Drost, J., & Hansen, P. (1995). Experiences of meaning in life: A combined qualitative and quantitative approach. British Journal of Psychology, 86(3), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). Modernization and changing contexts of flow in work and leisure. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 193–213). New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drentea, P. (2002). Retirement and mental health. Journal of Aging and Health, 14(2), 167–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 499–518.Google Scholar
Goff, S. J., Fick, D. S., & Oppliger, R. A. (1997). The moderating effect of spouse support on the relation between serious leisure and spouses’ perceived leisure-family conflict. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, J., Moore, D., McGuire, F., & Stebbins, R. (2008). Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1), 47–68.Google Scholar
Graef, R. (2000). Flow patterns in everyday life. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.), Beyond boredom and anxiety (pp. 140–160). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hamilton-Smith, E. (1992). Work, leisure and optimal experience. Leisure Studies, 11, 243–256.Google Scholar
Han, S. (1992). The relationship between life satisfaction and flow in elderly Korean immigrants. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 138–149). New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Hawkins, B., Foose, A.K., & Binkley, A.L. (2004). Contribution of leisure to the life satisfaction of older adults in Australia and the United States. World Leisure Journal, 46(2), 4–12.Google Scholar
Huebner, B.M. (2005). The effect of incarceration on marriage and work over the life course. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 281–203.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, S.L., & Kleiber, D.A. (2005). Gifts of the ordinary: Casual leisure’s contributions to health and well-being. World Leisure Journal, 47(3), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.D., Hollenhorst, S.J., & Perna, F. (2003). An empirical comparison of the four channel flow model and adventure experience paradigm. Leisure Sciences, 25, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A.A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, J.R., & Freysinger, V.J. (2000). 21st century leisure: Current issues. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, W.F. (2001). The benefits and costs of serious running. World Leisure Journal, 43(2), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannell, R., Zuzanek, J., & Larson, R. (1988). Leisure states and the flow experience: Testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypotheses. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(4), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannell, R.C. (1993). High investment activity and life satisfaction among older adults: Committed, serious leisure, and flow activities. In Kelly, J.R. (Ed.), Activity and aging (pp.125–145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Moneta, G.B. (2004). The flow experience across cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, S.J., & Conger, P.R. (1991). No time to look back: Approaching the finish line of life’s course. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privette, G., & Bundrick, C.M. (1991). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: Correspondence of personal descriptions and theoretical constructs. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality: Special Issue: Handbook of Self-Actualization, 6(5), 169–188.Google Scholar
Pushkar, D., Arbuckle, T., Conway, M., Chaikelson, J., & Maag, U. (1997). Everyday activity parameters and competence in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 600–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., Congdon, R., & Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Russell, R.V. (1990). Recreation and quality of life in old age: A causal analysis. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 9, 77–89.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.E., & Stone, A.A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychology, 17(1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scollon, C.N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling method: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibthorp, J., Witter, E., Wells, M., Ellis, G., & Voelkl, J. (2004). Hierarchical linear modeling in park, recreation, and tourism research. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(1), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegenthaler, K.L., & O’Dell, I. (2003). Older golfers: Serious leisure and successful aging. World Leisure Journal, 45(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, S., Angelo, K.M., & Vallereux, S.R. (2008). Extraversion and positive affect: A day reconstruction study of person-environment transactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1613–1618.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.A. (2001). New directions in the theory and research of serious leisure. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.A. (2004). Between work and leisure: A study of common ground of two separate worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.A. (2007). Serious leisure. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Swenson, M.M. (1998). The meaning of home of five elderly women. Health Care for Women International, 19, 381–393.Google ScholarPubMed
Whalen, S. (1997). Assessing flow experiences in highly able adolescent learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Yaffey, D. (1991). Outdoor pursuits and adventure experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 8(2), 22–25.Google Scholar
Yau, M.K., & Packer, T.L. (2002). Health and well-being through T’ai Chi: Perceptions of older adults in Hong Kong. Leisure Studies, 21(2), 163–178.Google Scholar