Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:14:51.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gray Power: Agenda For Future Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Shankar A. Yelaja
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gray Power came into prominence in the 1970s and has received considerable attention among social gerontologists. This paper reviews studies on gray power, political consciousness among the elderly and advocacy by organizations on behalf of older people, and it considers their implications for further research. Constructing the agenda for future research on gray power requires recognizing the diversity of older people and the life-course context through which individuals shape their concepts of old age and its meaning. Studies on political power need to be longitudinal as well as cross-sectional. Furthermore, studies on the political power of older people should consider how the young and middle-aged perceive their power relative to issues of common concern. Finally the studies of age advocacy groups should be linked with those of other advocacy organizations involved in social change (e.g. the disabled). The paper concludes that research on gray power should be fostered along inter-disciplinary lines of inquiry.

Résumé

Le pouvoir gris a commencé à prendre de l'ampleur dans les années '70 et a retenu l'attention des gérontologues sociaux. Cet article examine les études portant sur le pouvoir gris, la conscience politique chez les personnes âgées, les groupes militant en faveur des gens âgés, pour finalement analyser l'influence que ces études auront sur la recherche future. Avant de formuler l'agenda de la recherche future au domaine du pouvoir gris, il faut d'abord reconnaître la pluralité des personnes âgées et le contexte du cheminement à travers lequel chacun développe ses propres idées sur le vieillissement et sa définition. Les études sur le pouvoir politique doivent être longitudinales et transversales. De plus, les études sur le pouvoir politique des personnes âgées doivent tenir compte de comment les jeunes et les personnes d'âge moyen perçoivent le pouvoir qu'ils détiennent par rapport à des questions d'ordre courant. Finalement, les groupes militant en faveur des gens âgés devraient s'ajouter à ceux qui cherchent à entraîner des changements sociaux (e.g. les infirmes). L'auteur se termine en notant que la recherche sur le pouvoir gris devrait adopter un parcours interdisciplinaire.

Keywords

powerpolitical participationvoting behaviourage-advocacy organization.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Summer/été 1989 , pp. 118 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atchley, Robert C. (1972), The Social Forces in Later Life: An Introduction to Social Gerontology, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Binstock, Robert (1974), “Aging and the Future of American Politics,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 415, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, Kenneth (1974), Old Age Pensions and Policy-Making in Canada, Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus (1971), “Politics Through the Life Cycle,” The Gerontohgist 11 (2, Part 1), 112–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, John Creighton and Strate, John (1981), “Are Old People Conservative?” The Gerontohgist 21 (6), 580–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlie, Michael K. (1969), “The Politics of Age: Interest Group of Social Movement?” The Gerontologist 4 (4, Part 1), 259–263.Google Scholar
Curtis, James E. and Lambert, Ronald D. (1976), “Voting, Election Interest, and Age: National Findings for English and French Canadians,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 9, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuder, S.J. (1973), “Perceived Prestige Loss and Political Attitudes Among the Aged,” The Gerontologist 13 (1), 69–75.Google Scholar
Decker, David L. (1980), Social Gerontology: An Introduction to the Dynamics of Aging, Boston: Litde, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1976), “Old People and Public Policy,” Social Policy 7 (3), 21–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Fengler, A. and Wood, Vivian (1972), “The Generation Gap: An Analysis of Attitudes on Contemporary Issues,” The Gerontologist 12, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gifford, C. (1983), “Senior Politics,” Policy Options 4 (2) 12–15.Google Scholar
Gifford, C. (1985), “Grey is Strong,” Policy Options 6 (8), 16–18.Google Scholar
Gifford, C., A Manuscript on Senior Advocacy Groups Across Canada, unpublished, Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
Glamser, Francis D. (1974), “The Importance of Age to Conservative Opinions: A Multivariate Analysis,” Journal of Gerontology 29, 549–554.Google Scholar
Halamendavis, Val J. (1986), “Tribute to Maggie Kuhn: Compassionate Revolutionary,” Caring 5 (2), 34–36.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. (1960), “Private Integrated Housing in a Medium Size Northern City,” Social Problems 7, 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rochelle (1977), The Other Generation: The New Power of Older People, Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kearl, M.C., Moore, K. and Osberg, J.S. (1982), “Political Implications of the [New Agism],” International Journal of Aging and Human Development 15 (3), 167–183.Google Scholar
Lowy, Louis (1979), Social Work With the Aging, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Maddox, G.L. (1978), “Will Senior Power Become a Reality?” in Jarvik, F. and Kratz, H. (ed.) Aging Into the 21st Century, New York: Gardner Press, 185–196.Google Scholar
Marascuilo, L. and Penfield, K. (1966), “A Northern Urban Community's Attitudes Toward Racial Imbalances in Schools and Classrooms,” School Review 74, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Henry J. (1974), “Old Age Associations in National Politics,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sdence 415, 106–119.Google Scholar
Pratt, Henry J. (1976a), The Politics of Old Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragan, Pauline and Davis, William (1978), “The Diversity of Older Voters,” Society 15 (5), 50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roest, Paul M. (1978), “The Gray Panthers: An Analysis of a Social Movement of the Aged,” Belleville Area College, Illinois, Series: M5S 1978 0991.Google Scholar
Rule, W.L.B. (1977), “Politics and Alienation and Voting Attitudes Among the Elderly Generation,” The Gerontologist 17 (5), 400–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, Leroy O. and Fletcher, Susan (1986), The Seniors Boom, Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
“Treat us with dignity, don't call us [dear[ elderly demand,” The Globe and Mail, 2 Dec. 1987, A16.Google Scholar
Webber, Irving L., Coombs, David W. and Hollingsworth, J. Selwyn (1974), “Variations in Value Orientations by Age in a Developing Society,” Journal of Gerontology 29, 676–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yelaja, Shankar A. (1981), “Gray Power: A Study of Political Attitudes and Behaviour of Older People in a Canadian City,” Paper presented at the XII International Congress of Gerontology July 12–17, 1981, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar