Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:39:40.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La mémoire autobiographique à travers le parcours de vie: évaluation rétrospective du bonheur et de la vulnérabilité

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Nora Dasoki ,
Davide Morselli  and
Dario Spini
Nora Dasoki*
Affiliation:
Pôle de recherche national LIVES, Université de Lausanne, Suisse
Davide Morselli
Affiliation:
Pôle de recherche national LIVES, Université de Lausanne, Suisse
Dario Spini
Affiliation:
Pôle de recherche national LIVES, Université de Lausanne, Suisse
*
†La correspondance et les demandes de tiré à part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Nora Dasoki Pôle de recherche national LIVES Université de Lausanne Bâtiment Géopolis CH-1015 Lausanne (nora.dasoki@unil.ch)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our research is interested in understanding how the elderly evaluate their past, so the aims of this study are, first, to understand if there are age differences within the older population in terms of positivity effect, and second, to test if perception of happiness and vulnerability are two independent recall systems. To test our hypotheses, we used the Vivre / Leben / Vivere survey on a population of 65 years and older (n=4200), in Switzerland. Findings show that happiness depends on social and cultural norms, while there is an age effect for vulnerability. For happiness, there are no age differences, but this is not the case for vulnerability: the oldest age groups are less likely to report episodes of vulnerability during most of their lives.

Résumé

L’intérêt de cette recherche est de comprendre comment les personnes âgées évaluent rétrospectivement leur passé. D’une part, nous cherchons à savoir si, au sein de la population âgée, il existe des différences d’âge concernant l’effet de positivité. D’autre part, nous nous demandons si les perceptions de bonheur et de vulnérabilité liées à des souvenirs répondent à deux processus différents de rappel. Pour tester nos hypothèses, nous avons utilisé l’enquête Vivre / Leben / Vivere menée auprès d’individus de 65 ans et plus vivant en Suisse (n=4200). Les résultats montrent que le bonheur dépend des normes culturelles et sociales, alors que la vulnérabilité a un effet d’âge, confirmant l’indépendance de ces deux processus de rappel. Par ailleurs, pour le bonheur, il n’existe pas de différences d’âge, alors que c’est le cas pour la vulnérabilité: les groupes les plus âgés ont globalement moins de probabilité d’indiquer des moments de vulnérabilité pendant le parcours de vie.

Keywords

happinesspositivity effectautobiographical memorylifecoursethe elderlyvulnerabilitybonheureffet de positivitémémoire autobiographiqueparcours de viepersonnes âgéesvulnérabilité
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 308 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ågren, M. (1998). Life at 85 and 92: A qualitative longitudinal study of how the oldest old experience and adjust to the increasing uncertainty of existence. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(2), 105–117.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49, 123–135.Google Scholar
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2002). Emotionally charged autobiographical memories across the lifespan: the retention of happy, sad, traumatic, and involuntary memories. Psychology and Aging, 17, 636–652.Google Scholar
Berntsen, D., Rubin, D. C. & Siegler, I. C. (2011). Two versions of life: emotionally negative and positive life events have different roles in the organization of life story and identity. Emotion, 11, 1190–1201.Google Scholar
Birren, J. E. & Cochran, K. N. (2001). Telling the stories of life through autobiography groups. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bohn, A. & Berntsen, D. (2007). Pleasantness bias in flashbulb memories: positive and negative flashbulb memories of the fall of the Berlin Wall among East and West Germans. Memory and Cognition, 35, 565–577.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Bechara, A., Tranel, D. & Hawkley, L. C. (2011). Could an aging brain contribute to subjective well-being? The value added by a social neuroscience perspective. In Todorov, A., Fiske, S. T., and Prentice, D. A. (Eds.), Social neuroscience. Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (pp. 249–262). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M. & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U. & Nesselroade, J. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 644–655.Google Scholar
Cavalli, S., Dasoki, N., Dus, D., Masotti, B. & Rosciano, A. (2015). Condizioni di salute, benessere e scambi di servizi nella popolazione anziana residente in Ticino. In Giudici, F., Cavalli, S. & Egloff, M. (Eds.), Fragilità e risorse della popolazione anziana in Ticino. Bellinzona, SWI: USTAT, coll. Analisi.Google Scholar
Comblain, C., D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 31, 173–189.Google Scholar
Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 594–628.Google Scholar
Courgeau, D. & Lelièvre, E. (1989). Analyse démographique des biographies. Paris: INED.Google Scholar
D’Argembeau, A., Comblain, C. & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Affective valence and the self-reference effect: influence of retrieval conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 457–466.Google Scholar
D’Argembeau, A. & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858.Google Scholar
Demetrio, D. (1996). Raccontarsi. L’autobiografia come cura di sé. Milano, ITA: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.Google Scholar
Erikson, E., & Erikson, J. M. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York, NY: Norton (édition courante: 1997).Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. & Desrocher, M. (2012). Autobiographical memory in emerging adulthood: relationship with self-concept clarity. Journal of Adult Development, 19, 28–39.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Skorpen, C. G. & Hsu, A. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599.Google Scholar
Guillaume, C., Eustache, F. & Desgranges, B. (2009). L’effet de positivité: un aspect intriguant du vieillissement. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 1(3), 247–253.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Q., Mather, M. & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). The role of motivation in the age-related positive bias in autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15, 208–214.Google Scholar
Labouvie-Vief, G., Grühn, D. & Studer, J. (2010). Dynamic integration of emotion and cognition: equilibrium regulation in development and aging. In Lerner, R. M., Lamb, M. E. & Freund, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development: Social and emotional development (Vol. 2, pp. 79–115). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lalive d’Epinay, C. & Cavalli, S. (2009). Mémoire de l’histoire et appartenance générationnelle des personnes âgées. Gérontologie et Société, 130, 127–144.Google Scholar
Lalive d’Epinay, C. & Spini, D. (Eds.). (2008). Les années fragiles. La vie au-delà de quatre-vingts ans. Ville de Québec, QC: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H. & Dean, J. (1993). Affect and age: cross-sectional comparisons of structure and prevalence. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 165–175.Google Scholar
Ludwig, C., Cavalli, S. & Oris, M. (2014). ‘Vivre/Leben/Vivere’: an interdisciplinary survey addressing progress and inequalities of aging over the past 30 years in Switzerland. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 59(2), 240–248.Google Scholar
Mroczek, D. K. (2001). Age and emotion in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 87–90.Google Scholar
Reed, A. E. & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Emotion Science, 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C. & Berntsen, D. (2003). Life scripts help to maintain memories of highly positive, but not highly negative, events. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1–14.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A. & Poon, L. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory & Cognition, 26, 3–19.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C. & Schulkind, M. D. (1997). The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 25, 859–866.Google Scholar
Schlagman, S., Schulz, J. & Kvavilashvili, L. (2006). A content analysis of involuntary memories. Memory, 14(2), 161–175.Google Scholar
Schryer, E. & Ross, M. (2014). Does the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical recall reflect differences in appraisal or memory? Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(4), 548–556.Google Scholar
Smorti, A. (1997). Il Sé come testo. Firenze: Firenze.Google Scholar
Spini, D., Clémence, A. & Ghisletta, P. (2007). How are temporal and social comparisons related to appraisals of self-rated health during very old age? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 79–89.Google Scholar
Spini, D., Ghisletta, P., Guilley, E. & Lalive d’Epinay, C. J. (2007). Frail elderly. In Birren, J. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology. Age, aging, and the aged (Vol. 1, pp. 572–579), Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Spini, D. & Jopp, D. (2014). Old age and its challenges to identity. In Jaspal, R. & Breakwell, G. M. (Eds.), Identity process theory: Identity, social action and social change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
St. Jacques, P. & Levine, B. (2007). Ageing and autobiographical memory for emotional and neutral events. Memory, 15(2), 129–144.Google Scholar
Thomsen, D. K. & Berntsen, D. (2008). The cultural life script and life story chapters contribute to the reminiscence bump. Memory, 16, 420–436.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, M. (2003). Une approche cognitive du fonctionnement de la mémoire épisodique et de la mémoire autobiographique. Cliniques méditerranéennes, 1(67), 53–66.Google Scholar