Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:37:39.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Off-Target Verbosity and Talkativeness in Elderly People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Dolores Pushkar Gold
Affiliation:
Concordia University
David Andres
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Tannis Arbuckle
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Connie Zieren
Affiliation:
Concordia University

Abstract

This study examined whether off-target verbosity should be conceptualized as a distinct process from high levels of talkativeness in every day social situations. The relationship of age to these speech styles was also determined. The responses of 125 community-based elderly adults to a life-history interview were independently rated by two research assistants for the frequency and extent of off-target verbosity. The participant's activities in daily life, including talkativeness, were independently rated by the participants themselves, 125 similar-aged peers and 10 professional workers acquainted with the participants. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a model postulating off-target verbosity and talkativeness as two largely independent latent factors. Age was associated with the verbosity factor. The results were interpreted as indicating that off-target verbosity cannot be explained by the same processes that underlie social talkativeness. Possible mechanisms of the verbosity factor were discussed.

Résumé

Cette recherche visait à préciser si, d'une part, la verbosité hors-contexte peut être conceptualisée comme un processus distinct des niveaux élevés de verbalisation qu'on rencontre dans des situations sociales de la vie quotidienne et d'autre part, s'il existe une relation entre l'âge et ces deux styles langagiers. Au total, 125 personnes âgées des deux sexes résident dans la communauté ont participé à une entrevue portant sur leur profil de vie et leurs réponses ont été évaluées séparément par deux assistantes de recherche quant à la fréquence et à l'étendue de la verbosité hors-contexte. Les activités quotidiennes, y compris la verbalisation, ont été évalués par les participants eux-mêmes, par un pair du même âge (N = 125) et par un professionel qui connaissait le participant (N = 10). Une analyse factorielle supporte le modèle selon lequel la verbosité hors-contexte et la verbalisation constituent deux facteurs latents passablement indépendants. De plus, l'âge est en corrélation avee la verbosité. Nous avons interprété les résultats en soulignant que la verbosité hors-contexte ne peut pas être expliquée par les mêmes processus qui sont sous-jacents à la verbalisation sociale. Enfin, nous avons traité des mécanismes possibles qui peuvent expliquer la verbosité.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonucci, T.C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In Binstock, R.H. and George, L.K. (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (pp. 205220). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blythe, R. (1980). The View in Winter: Reflections on Old Age. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Boden, D., & Del Vento Bielby, D. (1983). The past as resource: A conversational analysis of elderly talk. Human Development, 26, 308319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botwinick, J., & Storandt, M. (1974). Vocabulary ability in later life. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 125, 303308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. (1990). Discourse production and normal aging: Performance on oral partial description tasks. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 210214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, M. (1985). “And all the daughters of Musick shall be brought low”: Language function in the elderly. Archives of Neurology, 41, 11351139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, D., Andres, D., Arbuckle, T., & Schwartzman, A. (1988). Measurement and correlates of verbosity in elderly people. Quantification and Correlates. Journal of Gerontology, 43(2), 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. (1987). Lifespan changes in syntactic complexity. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 323328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, S., Kynette, D., Rash, S., Sprott, R., & O'Brein, K. (1989). Lifespan changes to adults' language: Effects of memory and genre. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kynette, D., & Kemper, S. (1986). Aging and the loss of grammatical forms: A crosssectional study of language performance. Language and Communications, 6, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S.H. (1979). The Social World of Old Women: Management of Self-Identity. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
North, A.J., Ulatowska, H.K., Macaluso-Haynes, S.M., & Bell, H. (1986). Discourse performance in older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 23, 267283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obler, L.K. (1980). Narrative discourse style in the elderly. In Obler, L.K. and Albert, M.L. (Eds.), Language and Communication in the Elderly (pp. 7590). Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (1981). Language and aging: A neurobehavioral analysis. In Beasley, D.S. and Davis, G.A. (Eds.), Aging: Communication Processes and Disorders (pp. 107121). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication, 6, 1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuss, D.T., & Benson, D.F. (1986). The Frontal Lobes. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar