Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:19:53.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quasi-experimental Study of the Effectiveness of an Integrated Service Delivery Network for the Frail Elderly*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

André Tourigny ,
Pierre J. Durand ,
Lucie Bonin ,
Réjean Hébert  and
Louis Rochette
André Tourigny*
Affiliation:
Institut national de santé publique du Québec and Université Laval
Pierre J. Durand
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Lucie Bonin
Affiliation:
Institut national de santé publique du Québec
Réjean Hébert
Affiliation:
Sherbrooke University
Louis Rochette
Affiliation:
Unité de recherché en gériatrie de l'Université Laval
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : André Tourigny, MD MBA, Unité de recherche en gériatrie de l'Université Laval, Hôpital du St-Sacrement, 1050, chemin Ste-Foy, L2–34, Québec G1S 4L8. (andre.tourigny@cha.quebec.qc.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a new, integrated service delivery (ISD) network of health and social services for frail elderly living in a semi-urban community. A quasi-experimental study was conducted from 1997 to 2000, with measures taken before implementation (T0) and every 12 months after implementation for a 3-year period (T1, T2, T3); 482 people aged 75 years or older from 2 communities, 272 in the experimental and 210 in the control group, were followed. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric statistics, a generalized linear model, and Cox regression for survival analysis. A declining trend in institutionalization was observed and the desire to be institutionalized was lower in the study group. When absence of deterioration on follow-up was analysed in terms of the level of autonomy, the ISD network produced positive effects on the frailer clientele at T1, effects that tended to be maintained at T2. In regard to caregivers' burden, the ISD network seemed to have been effective, with caregivers' burden being less at T1 and T2. The ISD network did not have a marked effect on the utilization of services. The ISD network did, in fact, produce some effects that should be seen as important for the elderly population.

Résumé

L'objectif de cette étude vise à évaluer l'efficacité d'un nouveau réseau de services intégré (RSI) pour les personnes âgées vulnérables en milieu semi-urbain. Une étude quasi-expérimentale avec mesures avant (T0) et après à chaque 12 mois (T1, T2, T3), de 1997 à 2000; auprès d'une cohorte initiale de 482 personnes dont 272 dans le groupe expérimental et 210 dans le groupe témoin. Les analyses ont été faites en employant des tests statistiques paramétriques et non-paramétriques, modèle linéaire généralisé et régression de Cox pour les analyses de survie. Une tendance à la baisse de l'hébergement a été observée et le désir d'être hébergé était plus faible dans le groupe expérimental. Quand le suivi sans détérioration était analysé en fonction de l'autonomie, le RSI avait des effets positifs à T1 et qui tendaient à se maintenir à T2 chez les personnes en plus grande perte d'autonomie. Le fardeau des aidants était moindre à T1 et T2 dans le groupe expérimental. Le RSI a eu peu d'effet sur l'utilisation des services de santé. Le RSI a effectivement produit des effets jugés importants pour une population âgée.

Keywords

aginghealth servicesintegrated service delivery networkfrail elderlyeffectivenessevaluationvieillissementservices de santéréseaux intégréspersonnes vulnérablesévaluation
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , Fall/Automne 2004 , pp. 229 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was carried out with the support of grants from the Conseil québécois de la recherche sociale, Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec, and Fonds pour l'adaptation des services de santé.

References

Bergman, H. (2002). From experimentation to policy to implementation to the agony and the ecstasy of integrated care. Retrieved July 11, 2004, from http://www.solidage.ca/docs/sipa2002/SIPA_FromExperimentationToPolicy.pdf.Google Scholar
Bergman, H., Beland, F., Lebel, P., Contandriopoulos, A.P., Tousignant, P., Brunelle, Y., et al. (1997). Care for Canada's frail elderly population: Fragmentation or integration? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157(8), 1116–1121.Google Scholar
Bernabei, R., Landi, F., Gambassi, G., & Sgadaria, A. (1998). A randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. British Medical Journal, 316, 1348–1351.Google Scholar
Black, N. (1996). Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal, 312, 1215–1218.Google Scholar
Boisvert, D. (1990). Participation et animation: une équipe de travail dynamique. In Boisvert, D. and Ouellet, P.A. (Eds.), Le Plan de Services Individualisé: Participation et animation: pratiques en déficience intellectuelle (pp. 107–132). Québec: Éditions Agence d'Arc.Google Scholar
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. (1994). Canadian Study of Health and Aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal 150, 899–913.Google Scholar
Challis, D., Darton, R., Johnson, L., Stone, M., & Traske, K. (1991). An evaluation of an alternative to long-stay hospital care for frail elderly patients: II. Costs and effectiveness. Age Ageing, 20, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, A., Brown, R., Archibald, N., Aliotta, S., & Fox, P.D. (2000). Best practices in coordinated care. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
Commission d'étude sur les services de santé et les services sociaux. (2000). Rapport et recommandations, les solutions émergentes. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.Google Scholar
Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. (2002). Building on values: The future of health care in Canada—Final report. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Davies, B. (1994). Comment améliorer la gestion par cas. In OECD, (Ed.), Protéger les personnes âgées dépendantes: nouvelles orientations (pp. 119–150). Études de politique sociale no. 14. Paris: Les Éditions de l'OCDE.Google Scholar
Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hébert, R., & Dubuc, N. (1995). Reliability of the revised functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF) for epidemiological research. Age Ageing, 24(5), 402–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eng, C., Pedulla, J., Eleazer, G.P., McCann, R., & Fox, N. (1997). Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE): An innovative model of integrated geriatric care and financing. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 45, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagnon, A.J., Schein, C., McVey, L., & Bergman, H. (1999). Randomized controlled trial of nurse case management of frail older people. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 47, 1118–1124.Google ScholarPubMed
Garant, L. (1994). Synthèse d'un programme d'évaluation sur la réponse aux besoins de longue durée des personnes âgées ayant des limitations fonctionnelles. Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec, Direction générale de la planification et de l'évaluation.Google Scholar
Hébert, R., Bravo, G., et Girouard, D. (1993). Fidélité de la traduction française de trois instruments d'évaluation des aidants naturels de malades déments. Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 12(3), 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, R., Carrier, R., & Bilodeau, A. (1988). The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing, 17, 293–302.Google Scholar
Hébert, H., Durand, P.J., Dubuc, N., & Tourigny, A. (2003). Frail elderly patients: New model for integrated service delivery. Canadian Family Physician, 49, 992–997.Google ScholarPubMed
Hébert, H., Durand, P.J., Dubuc, N., & Tourigny, A. (2003). PRISMA: A new model of integrated service delivery for frail older people in Canada. International Journal of Integrated Care, 3, 1–10. Retrieved 19 July 2004 from http://www.ijic.org/.Google Scholar
Hébert, R., Guilbault, J., Desrosiers, J., & Dubuc, N. (2001). The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): A clinical-based instrument for measuring disabilities and handicaps in older people. Geriatrics Today, 4(3), 141–147.Google Scholar
Hébert, R., Spiegelhalter, D.J., & Brayne, C. (1997). Setting the Minimal Metrically Detectable Change on disability rating scales. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 78, 1305–1308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollander, M.J., & Prince, M.J. (2002). Final report—“The third way”: A framework for organizing health related services for individuals with ongoing care needs and their families. Victoria, BC: Hollander Analytical Services.Google Scholar
Institut de la statistique du Québec. (2000). Perspectives démographiques des territoires de CLSC, 1996 à 2001. Québec: Service du développement de l'information.Google Scholar
Johri, M., Béland, F., & Bergman, H. (2003). International experiments in integrated care for the elderly: A synthesis of the evidence. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 222–235.Google Scholar
Joubert, P., Laberge, A., Fortin, J.P., Paradis, M., & Desbiens, F. (1991). Évaluation du programme québécois de services intensifs de maintien à domicile (SIMAD). Québec: Unité de recherche en santé communautaire, Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Kane, R.A. (1988). The noblest experiment of them all: Learning from the national channeling evaluation. Health Services Research, 23, 189–198.Google ScholarPubMed
Kemper, P. (1988). The evaluation of the national long-term care demonstration: Overview of the findings. Health Services Research, 23, 161–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Leutz, W.N. (1999). Five laws for integrating medical and social services lessons from the United States and United Kingdom. Milbanq Q, 77(1), 77–110.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M.A., & Kramer, J.H. (1991). Factors affecting decisions to institutionalize demented elderly. The Gerontologist, 31, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLehose, R.R., Reeves, B.C., Harvey, I.M., Sheldon, T.A., Russel, I.T., & Black, A.M.S. (2000). A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technology Assessment, 4(34), 1–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittelma, M.S., Ferris, S.H., Shulman, E., & Levin, B. (1996). A family intervention to delay nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1725–1731.Google Scholar
Murray, D.M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, M.D., Brooten, D., Campbell, R., Jacobsen, B.S., Mezey, M.D., Pauly, M.V., et al. (1999). Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomer, R., Yordi, C., DuNah, R., Fox, P., & Wilkinson, A. (1999). Effects of the medicare Alzheimer's disease demonstration on caregiver burden and depression. Health Services Research, 34, 669–689.Google Scholar
Paradis, M., Bonin, L., Tourigny, A., & Durand, P.J. (2001). Réseau de services intégrés aux aînés des Bois-Francs : mécanisme de coordination des services géronto-gériatriques : rapport d'implantation et de processus. Québec: Unité de recherche en gériatrie de l'Université Laval, Centre de recherche du CHA universitaire de Québec. Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://www.agencesss04.qc.ca/.Google Scholar
Pathy, M.S., Bayer, A., Harding, K., & Dibble, A. (1992). Randomised trial of case finding and surveillance of elderly people at home. Lancet, 340, 890–893.Google Scholar
Rich, M.W., Beckham, V., Wittenberg, C., Leven, C.L., Freedland, K.E., & Carney, R.M. (1995). A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 1190–1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., & Lipsey, M.W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stewart, S., Pearson, S., Luke, C.G., & Horowitz, J.D. (1998). Effects of home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and out-of-hospital deaths. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 46, 174–180.Google Scholar
Stuck, A.E., Aronow, H.U., Steiner, A., Alessi, C.A., Bula, C.J., Gold, M.N., Yuhas, K.E., Nisenbaum, R., Rubenstein, L.Z., & Beck, J.C. (1995). A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 1184–1189.Google Scholar
Tourigny, A., Gagnon, C., Miller-Stryckman, J., Bergeron, P., Paradis, M., et Thomassin, L. (1996). L'allocation directe au Québec: Des modes de fonctionnement variés à découvrir, des points de vue à faire connaître. Québec: Centre de santé publique de Québec.Google Scholar
Tourigny, A., Paradis, M., Bonin, L., Bussière, A., et Durand, P.J. (2002). Évaluation d'implantation d'une expérience novatrice: le réseau intégré de services aux aînés des Bois-Francs. Santé mentale au Québec, 27(2), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Haastregt, J.C.M., Diederiks, J.P.M., van Rossum, E., de Witte, L.P., & Crebolder, H.F.J.M. (2000). Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: A systematic review. BMJ, 320, 754–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissert, W.G., Matthews Cready, C., & Pawelak, J.E. (1988). The past and future of home and community based long-term care. The Milbank Quarterly, 66, 309–388.Google Scholar
Yordi, C.L., & Waldman, J. (1985). A consolidated model of long-term care: Service utilization and cost impacts. Gerontology, 25, 389–397.Google ScholarPubMed
Zarit, S.H., Orr, N.K., & Zarit, J.M. (1985). The hidden victims of Alzheimer's disease. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar