Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:04:24.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twenty Years of Canadian Social Research on Aging: An Attempted Understanding*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Frédéric Lesemann
Frédéric Lesemann
Affiliation:
Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), Culture et Société
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 20 , Issue S1: Northern Lights: Reflections on Canadian Gerontological Research , Summer/Été 2001 , pp. 58 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gee, G. M., & Gutman, G. M. (2000). The overselling ofpopulation aging, apocalyptic demography, intergenerational challenges, and social policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lesemann, F. (1981). Du pain et des services. La réforme de la santé et des services sociaux au Québec. Montreal: Éditions Albert Saint-Martin.Google Scholar
Lesemann, F. (2001). De l'État-providence à l'État partenaire. In Giroux, G. (Ed.), Etat, société, économic: Turbulence et transformation. Ste-Foy: Presses de l'Universite Laval.Google Scholar
Marshall, V. W. (1980, 1987). Aging in Canada, social perspectives. Don Mills: Fitzhenry and Whiteside.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1997). Beyond apocalyptic demography: Towards a moral economy of interdependence. Ageing and Society, 17, 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar