Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:48:53.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unpacking the Relationship between Operational Efficiency and Quality of Care in Ontario Long-Term Care Homes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Whitney Berta ,
Audrey Laporte  and
Natasha Kachan
Whitney Berta*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine; Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation; University of Toronto
Audrey Laporte
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine; Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation; University of Toronto
Natasha Kachan
Affiliation:
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Whitney Berta, Ph.D., Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Ste. 425 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 3M6 (whit.berta@utoronto.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this multiple-case study, we engaged directors of care of Ontario long-term care (LTC) homes in semi-structured interviews designed to increase our understanding of the influence exerted by organizational and extra-organizational factors on two key aspects of organizational performance: operational efficiency and quality of care. We also examined the influence of these factors on the relationship between efficiency and quality. Through a review of the health services and organization and management literatures, four broad factors identified a priori as influential for one or both performance outcomes were used to guide our data collection: staff characteristics, facility characteristics, extra-organizational influences, and the function of volunteers. Our findings suggest that while both high efficiency and high quality of care are achievable, there are aspects of a home’s operations and realities associated with the LTC sector in Ontario that can make achieving both, simultaneously, exceedingly challenging.

Résumé

Dans cette étude de cas multiples, nous avons retenu les administrateurs des maisons de soins de longue durée (SLD) dans les entretiens semi-structurés afin d’accroître notre compréhension de l’influence exercée par les facteurs organizationnels et extra-organisationnels sur deux aspects clés de la performance organizationnelle : l’efficacité operationnelle et la qualité des soins. Nous avons aussi examiné l’influence de ces facteurs sur la relation entre l’efficacité et la qualité. Grace à un examen de la littérature de soins de santé et de l’organisation de gestion, quatre grands facteurs ont été identifiés a priori comme influents pour un ou deux résultats de rendement et ont été utilisés pour guider notre collecte de données : les caractér-istiques du personnel, les caractéristiques de l’établissement, les influences extra-organisationnelles, et les fonction de bénévoles.

Nos résultats suggèrent que, alors que tous les deux, haut rendement et haut qualité des soins, sont réalisables, il y a des aspects de la fonctionnement d’une maison et les réalités associés au secteur des soins de longue durée en Ontario qui peut faire atteindre tous les deux à la fois, simultanément, excessivement difficile.

Keywords

soins de longue duréemaisons de soins infirmiersqualité des soinsl’efficacité organizationnellelongterm carenursing homesquality of careoperational efficiency
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 543 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The study protocol received approval from the University of Toronto’s Ethics Review Board.

References

Aaronson, W.E., Zinn, J.S., & Rosko, M.D. (1994). Do for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes behave differently? The Gerontologist, 34, 775–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak-Holl, J., Zinn, J.S., & Mor, V. (1996). The impact of market and organizational characteristics on nursing care facility service innovation: A resource dependency perspective. Health Services Research, 31(1), 97–117.Google ScholarPubMed
Berta, W., Laporte, A., & Valdmanis, V. (2005). Observations on institutional long-term care in Ontario: 1996-2001. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berta, W., Laporte, A., Zarnett, D., Valdmanis, V., & Anderson, G. (2006). A pan-Canadian perspective on institutional long-term care. Health Policy, 79, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. (2001). Economics of strategy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Binstock, R.H., & Spector, W.D. (1997). Five priority areas for research on long-term care. Health Services Research, 32(5), 715–730.Google ScholarPubMed
Canadian Healthcare Association. (2007). Guide to Canadian healthcare facilities (Vol. 14). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CHA Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, R.L. (1993). Community presence and nursing home quality of care: The ombudsman as a complementary role. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(4), 336–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J.W., & Dubay, L.C. (1990). The effects of reimbursement method and ownership on nursing home costs, case mix and staffing. Inquiry, 27, 183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Daft, R.L. (2004). Organization theory and design (8th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
Damianakis, T., Wagner, L.M., Bernstein, S., & Marziali, E. (2007). Volunteers’ experiences visiting the cognitively impaired in nursing homes: A friendly visiting program. Canadian Journal on Aging, 26(4), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deber, R., & Williams, A.P. (2001). Country portrait: Canada. Paper prepared to the Four Country Conference on Aging and Health Policy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada., July.Google Scholar
Evans, R.G., McGrail, K.M., Morgan, S.G., Barer, M.L., & Hertzman, C. (2001). Apocalypse no: Population aging and the future of health care systems. Canadian Journal of Aging, 20(Suppl. 1), 160–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrier, G., & Valdmanis, V. (1996). Rural hospital performance and its correlates. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.H. (1991). The profit motive and patient care. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greiner, L.W. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(July–August), 37–46.Google Scholar
Harrington, C., Woolhandler, S., Mullan, J., Carrillo, H., & Himmelstein, D.U. (2001). Does investor ownership of nursing homes compromise the quality of care? American Journal of Public Health, 91(9), 1452–1455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, C., Zimmerman, D., Karon, S.L., Robinson, J., & Beutel, K. (2000). Nursing home staffing and its relationship to deficiencies. Journal of Gerontology, 55B(5), S278–S287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, R. (2002). Research on aging: Providing evidence for rescuing the Canadian Health Care System (Special Report – Brief submitted to the Commission on the Future of Health in Canada May 28, 2002), Canadian Journal on Aging 21(3), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, M.J. (1994). The costs, and cost-effectiveness, of continuing-care services in Canada. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University of Ottawa Economic Projects, 94–10.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, B. (2003). Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Management Science, 6, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, A., Laporte, A., Berta, W., & Coyte, P. (2009). Operational efficiency in Ontario’s long term care facilities. University of Toronto. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Knafl, K.A., West, D.C., Quint Benoliel, J., & Morse, J.M. (1988). Managing and analyzing qualitative data: A description of tasks, techniques and methods. Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 195–218.Google Scholar
Laporte, A., Berta, W., & Valdmanis, V. (2005). Frontier estimation, ownership and quality of care: An application to Ontario’s nursing homes. University of Toronto Working Paper.Google Scholar
Litwak, E. (1985). Complementary roles for formal and informal support groups: A study of nursing homes and mortality rates. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(4), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, M.J., Cohen, M., McGrail, K., Broemeling, A.M., Adler, R.N., Schulzer, M., et al. (2005). Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: Does type of ownership matter? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172(5), 645–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mukamel, D.B. (1997). Risk-adjusted outcome measures and quality of care in nursing homes. Medical Care, 28(10), 952–962.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C., Harrington, C., Kitchener, M., & Saliba, D. (2003). Quality of care in nursing homes: An analysis of relationships among profit, quality and ownership. Medical Care, 41(12), 1318–1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, R.E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S., & Kleiner, B.H. (2003). How to manage unpaid volunteers in organisations. Management Research News, 26(2/3/4), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3, 68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, R.Y. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zinn, J.S., Mor, V., Castle, N., Intrator, O., & Brannon, D. (1999). Organizational and environmental factors associated with nursing home participation in managed care. Health Services Research, 33(6), 1753–1767.Google ScholarPubMed