Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:50:53.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variations in Age-Related Deficits among Episodic Memory Tasks: An Archival Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Pierre Foisy
Pierre Foisy
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Craik (1986) has proposed that age-related deficits on memory tasks are proportional to the extent to which these tasks require the use of self-initiated operations. Because the number of required self-initiated operations vary among traditional episodic memory tasks, these tasks should display a gradation of age-related deficits. The objective of this study was to test this hypothesis. A secondary analysis (i.e. based on the results of previous studies) was performed on 22 studies in which verbal stimuli were used as targets on more than one episodic memory task. Of the 24 comparisons provided by the studies, 21 supported the gradation concept. This result suggests that the self-initiated operation hypothesis is valid.

Résumé

Craik (1986) a proposé que les déficits liés à l'âge dans les tâches mnésiques sont proportionnelles au nombre d'opérations auto-initiées qu'elles requièrent. Étant donné que le nombre d'opérations auto-initiées varie parmi les tâches mnésiques traditionnelles (i.e. reconnaissance, rappel indicé et rappel libre), ces tâches devraient démontrer une gradation de l'ampleur des déficits liés à l'âge. Cette étude avait pour but de tester cette hypothèse. Une analyse secondaire (i.e. fondée sur des données amassées lors d'études précédentes) a été effectuée sur 22 recherches dans lesquelles des stimuli verbaux avaient été utilisés dans plus d'une témoire épisodique. Des 24 comparaisons fournies par les recherches, 21 appuient l'existence d'une gradation. Ce résultat suggère que l'hypothese des opérations auto-initiées est valide.

Keywords

Episodic MemorySelf-initiated OperationsEnvironmental SupportMémoire épisodiqueopérations auto-initiéessoutien environnemental.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , Winter/hiver 1995 , pp. 686 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown-Whistler, S., & Freund, J.S. (1993). Age differences in free recall and clustering as a function of list length and trials. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, R.L., Sandier, S.P., & Schroeder, K. (1987). Aging and memory for words and action events: Effects of item repetition and list length. Psychology and Aging, 2, 280–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, A.C. (1985). Adult age, presentation time, and memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craik, F.I.M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 302, 341–359.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. (1984). Age differences in remembering. In Squire, L.R. & Butters, N. (Eds.), Neuropsychology of Memory (pp. 3–12). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In Klix, F. & Hagendorf, H. (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409–422). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. (1990). Changes in memory with normal aging: A functional view. In Wurtman, R.J. et al. (Eds.), Advances in Neurology, Vol. 51: Alzheimer's disease (pp. 201–205). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M., & McDowd, J.M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474–479.Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M., & Rabinowitz, J.C. (1985). The effects of presentation rate and encoding task on age-related memory deficits. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erber, J.T. (1974). Age differences in recognition memory. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erber, J.T. (1984). Age differences in the effect of encoding congruence on incidental free and cued recall. Experimental Aging Research, 10, 221–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erber, J., Herman, T.G., & Botwinick, J. (1980). Age differences in memory as a function of depth of processing. Experimental Aging Research, 6, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geffen, G., Moar, K.J., O'Hanlon, A.P., Clark, C.R., & Geffen, L. B. (1990). Performance measures of 16- to 86-year-old males and females on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, L.V., & Becker, B.J. (1986). Statistical methods in the meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In Hyde, J.S. & Linn, M.C. (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 14–50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Isingrini, M., Fontaine, R., Grellier, A., & Sauger, V. (1990). Vieillissement et déficit mnémonique: Effet des indices catégoriels et spécifiques dans le rappel d'une liste de mots./Memory deficit and aging: The effect of categorical and specific cues on a word-list recall. Année Psychologique, 90, 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Toth, J.P., & Yonelinas, A.P. (1993). Separating conscious from unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139–154.Google Scholar
Light, L.L., & Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 531–541.Google ScholarPubMed
Lockhart, R.S., & Craik, F.I.M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luis, J.D. (1985). Generation and elaboration in older adults. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 3555B. (University Microfilms No. AAC8627832).Google Scholar
Macht, M.L., & Buschke, H. (1983). Age differences in cognitive effort in recall. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, D.J. (1986). Adult age differences in visual word recognition: Semantic encoding and episodic retention. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioural sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, M. (1978). What is memory aging the aging of? Developmental Psychology, 14, 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.L. (1990). Effects of environmental context on memory for actions and verbal items in young and elderly adults. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 4082B. (University Microfilms No. AAC9100222).Google Scholar
Poon, L.W. (1985). Differences in human memory with aging: Nature, causes, and clinical implications. In Birren, J.E. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (2nd ed., pp. 427–462). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, J.C. (1984). Aging and recognition failure. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinowitz, J.C. (1986). Priming in episodic memory. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinowitz, J.C., & Craik, F.I.M. (1986). Prior retrieval effects in young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 368–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rankin, J.L., & Collins, M. (1985). Adult age differences in memory elaboration. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 451–458.Google Scholar
Rankin, J.L., & Firnhaber, S. (1986). Adult age differences in memory: Effects of distinctive and common encodings. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 141–146.Google Scholar
Rankin, J.L., & Hinrichs, J.V. (1983). Age, presentation rate, and the effectiveness of structural and semantic recall cues. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 593–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1985). A theory of cognitive aging. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A., & Kausler, D.H. (1985). Memory Methodology in Maturity. In Brainerd, C.J. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Basic Processes in Memory Development (pp. 293–330). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schonfield, A.D., Davidson, H., & Jones, H. (1983). An example of age-associated interference in memorizing. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaps, L.P., & Nilsson, L.G. (1980). Encoding and retrieval operations in relation to age. Developmental Psychology, 16, 636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spofford, M. (1985). The effects of muscular tension and interactive imagery training on the recall of old and young adults. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 4437B. (University Microfilms No. AAC8526736).Google Scholar
Traxler, A.J. (1973). Retroactive and proactive inhibition in young and elderly adults using an unpaced modified free recall test. Psychological Reports, 32, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P, Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1993). Facts and fiction about memory aging: A quantitative integration of research findings. Journals of Gerontology, 48, P157–P171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, R.L., & Boatwright, L.K. (1983). Age differences in cued recall and recognition under varying encoding and retrieval conditions. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, R.L., & Cohen, S.L. (1985). The systematic use of semantic and acoustic processing by younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed