Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:18:51.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Each Copy of the Real Line in is Removable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

E. Santillan Zeron
E. Santillan Zeron*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, email: eduardo@math.toronto.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Around 1995, Professors Lupacciolu, Chirka and Stout showed that a closed subset of ${{\mathbb{C}}^{N}}\left( N\ge 2 \right)$ is removable for holomorphic functions, if its topological dimension is less than or equal to $N\,-\,2$. Besides, they asked whether closed subsets of ${{\mathbb{C}}^{2}}$ homeomorphic to the real line (the simplest 1-dimensional sets) are removable for holomorphic functions. In this paper we propose a positive answer to that question.

Keywords

32D20holomorphic functionremovable set
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2001 , pp. 126 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2001

References

[1] Chirka, E. M. and Stout, E. L., Removable singularities in the boundary. In: Contributions to complex analysis and analytic geometry (eds. H. Skoda and J. M. Trépreau), Aspects of Math. E26, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1994, 43–104.Google Scholar
[2] Chisterson, C. O. and Voxman, W. L., Aspects of topology. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[3] Hurewicz, W. and Wallman, H., Dimension theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1941.Google Scholar
[4] Lupacciolu, G., Characterization of removable sets in strongly pseudoconvex boundaries. Ark. Mat. (2) 32 (1994), 455–473.Google Scholar
[5] Lupacciolu, G., Holomorphic extension to open hulls. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 23 (1996), 363–382.Google Scholar