Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:07:50.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Un × Um Modular Invariants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nondas E. Kechagias
Nondas E. Kechagias*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Aegean Karlovassi, 83200 Greece, e-mail: kexagn@pythagoras.aegean.ariadne-t.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the rings of invariants RG, where R is the symmetric algebra of a tensor product between two vector spaces over the field Fp andG = Un × Um. A polynomial algebra is constructed and these invariants provide Chern classes for the modular cohomology of Un+m.

Keywords

13F20Invariant theorycohomology of the unipotent group
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , 01 March 1997 , pp. 54 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1997

References

1. Dickson, L. E., A fundamental system of invariants of the general modular linear group with a solution of the form problem, Trans. Amer.Math. Soc. 12 (1911), 75–98.Google Scholar
2. Mui, Huyhn, Modular invariant theory and the cohomology algebras of the symmetric groups, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. (1975), 319–369.Google Scholar
3. Man, B. M. and Milgram, R. J., On the Chern classes of the regular representations of some finite groups, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 25 (1982), 259–268.Google Scholar
4. Milgram, R. J. and Priddy, S. B., Invariant theory and HŁ(GLn(Fp);Fp), J. Pure Appl. Algebra 44 (1987), 291–302.Google Scholar
5. Stanley, R. P., Invariants of finite groups and their applications to combinatorics, Bull. Amer.Math. Soc. (3) 1 (1979), 475–511.Google Scholar
6. Wilkerson, C., A primer on Dickson invariants, Contemporary Math. 19 (1983), 421–434.Google Scholar