Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:16:55.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolutions of Associative and Lie Algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Ron Adin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Bar Ilan University Ramat Gan 52900 Israel, email: radin@macs.biu.ac.il
David Blanc
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Haifa Haifa 31905 Israel, email: blanc@mathcs2.haifa.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Certain canonical resolutions are described for free associative and free Lie algebras in the category of non-associative algebras. These resolutions derive in both cases from geometric objects, which in turn reflect the combinatorics of suitable collections of leaf-labeled trees.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[B1] Blanc, D., New model categories from old. J. Pure Appl. Math. 109 (1996), 3760.Google Scholar
[B2] Blanc, D., Homotopy operations and rational homotopy type. Preprint, 1996.Google Scholar
[BS] Blanc, D. and Stover, C. S., A generalized Grothendieck spectral sequence. In: Adams Memorial Symposium on Algebraic Topology, Vol. 1 (Eds. N. Ray and G. Walker), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 175 (1992), 145161.Google Scholar
[Bo] Boardman, J. M., Homotopy structures and the language of trees. In: Algebraic Topology, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 22 (1971), 3758.Google Scholar
[CR] Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I., Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras. J.Wiley and Sons, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
[GK] Ginzburg, V. L. and Kapranov, M. M., Koszul duality for operads. Duke Math. J. 76 (1994), 203273.Google Scholar
[H] Hall, M. Jr., A basis for free Lie rings and higher commutators in free groups. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1950), 575581.Google Scholar
[HW] Hanlon, P. and Wachs, M., On Lie k-algebras. Adv.Math. 113 (1995), 206236.Google Scholar
[LM] Lada, T. J. and Markl, M., Strongly homotopy Lie algebras. Comm. Algebra 23 (1995), 21472161.Google Scholar
[M] Markl, M., Models for operads. Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), 14711500.Google Scholar
[MS] Markl, M. and Shnider, S., Coherence without commutative diagrams, Lie-hedra and other curiosities. Preprint, 1996.Google Scholar
[Q1] Quillen, D. G., Homotopical Algebra. Lecture Notes in Math. 20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[Q2] Quillen, D. G., Rational homotopy theory. Ann.Math. 90 (1969), 205295.Google Scholar
[Q3] Quillen, D. G., On the (co-)homology of commutative rings. Applications of Categorical Algebra, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 17 (1970), 6587.Google Scholar
[RW] Robinson, C. A. and Whitehouse, S., The tree representation of Σn+1. J. Pure Appl. Alg. 111 (1996), 245253.Google Scholar
[SS1] Schlessinger, M. and Stasheff, J. D., The Lie algebra structure of tangent cohomology and deformation theory. J. Pure Appl. Alg. 38 (1985), 313322.Google Scholar
[SS2] Schlessinger, M. and Stasheff, J. D., Deformation theory and rational homotopy type. Inst.Hautes Études Sci. Publ.Math. (to appear).Google Scholar
[Stn] Stanley, R. P., Enumerative Combinatorics, Vol. I. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1986.Google Scholar
[Sts] Stasheff, J. D., Homotopy associativity of H-spaces, I. Trans. Amer.Math. Soc. 108 (1963), 275292.Google Scholar
[Z] Ziegler, G. M., Lectures on Polytopes. Grad. Texts in Math. 152, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1995.Google Scholar