Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T00:12:45.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precautionary Legal Duties andPrinciples in Modern International Environmental Law. ByHarald Hohmann.London: Graham &Trotman, 1994. Pp. xvii,377. ISBN 1-85333-911-3

Review products

Precautionary Legal Duties andPrinciples in Modern International Environmental Law. ByHarald Hohmann.London: Graham &Trotman, 1994. Pp. xvii,377. ISBN 1-85333-911-3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Jutta Brunnée
Jutta Brunnée*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews / Recensions de livres
Information
Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 33 , 1995 , pp. 484 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Preventive Legal Obligations and Principles in Modern International Environmental Law (Praeventive Rechtspflichten und-prinzipien des modernen Umweltvoelkerrechts) ” (1993) 18 Queen’s L.J. 491–501.

2 In this update to the German edition, Hohmann writes: “I must admit that we are on safer legal grounds when we demand State practice (external practice) as an additional requirement of customary law, and I would integrate State practice if asked to write an expert legal opinion.”.

3 Note references omitted in quote.

4 At this point, Principle 15 is quoted as stating: “lack of full scientific certainty shall [sic] not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures.”