Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:59:08.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing Statehood through Sport: Football, Kosovo, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2019

RYAN GAUTHIER
Get access

Abstract

Entities seeking to establish statehood have used participation in sport to bolster their claims. Kosovo is the latest entity to use this strategy. Kosovo’s quest to join the Union of European Football Associations led to a 2017 Court of Arbitration for Sport decision examining whether Kosovo was sufficiently an “independent state.” This article considers how participation in sport plays a role in establishing a broader, contextual conceptualization of statehood. This article then applies this concept to case studies, with particular attention paid to Kosovo. Finally, the article examines sport’s gradual acceptance that it must work within the broader international political and legal world.

Résumé

Les entités cherchant à établir leur statut d’État ont parfois recours à la pratique sportive pour appuyer leurs revendications. Le Kosovo est l’exemple le plus récent de l’utilisation de cette stratégie. Les efforts du Kosovo pour se joindre à l’Union des associations européennes de football ont débouché en 2017 sur une décision du Tribunal arbitral du sport examinant si le Kosovo était suffisamment “un État indépendant.” Cet article examine dans quelle mesure la participation au sport peut jouer un rôle dans l’établissement d’un État selon une conceptualisation large et contextuelle de ce statut. Cette notion est ensuite évaluée à la lumière d’études de cas, notamment celui du Kosovo. Enfin, l’article prend en note la reconnaissance progressive du monde sportif qu’il doit œuvrer au sein du monde politique et juridique international au sens large.

Keywords

Court of Arbitration for Sportinternational sports lawKosovorecognition of statesstatehoodUnion of European Football AssociationsDéfinition de l’Étatdroit international du sportKosovoreconnaissance de l’ÉtatTribunal arbitral du sportUnion des associations européennes de football
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 56 , October 2019 , pp. 220 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grohmann, Karolos, “Kosovo Granted Provisional Olympic Recognition by IOC,” Reuters (22 October 2014), online: <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-olympics-kosovo-membership-idUSKCN0IB29220141022>.Google Scholar

2 Grohmann, Karolos, “Kosovo Earns Olympic Recognition, Serbia Furious,” Reuters (9 December 2014), online: <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-olympics-kosovo-idUSKBN0JN13B20141209>.Google Scholar

3 Homewood, Brian, “Kosovo Becomes Member of UEFA, Paves Way for FIFA Application,” Reuters (3 May 2016), online: <http://reuters.com/article/uk-uefa-kosovo-idUKKCN0XU11D>.Google Scholar

4 Although the question before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), and the focus of this article, is the admission of the national sporting federation, the Football Federation of Kosovo (FFK), as a member of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), I will simply refer to the FFK as “Kosovo” for ease of reference, unless a distinction between the FFK as a sporting organization and Kosovo as a state needs to be drawn. The same applies to other national sporting federations and their states.

5 See Yin, Robert K, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003) at 1;Google Scholar Bennett, Andrew & Elman, Colin, “Case Study Methods” in Christian Reus-Smit & Duncan Snidal, eds, The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 499 at 502–04, 506–07.Google Scholar

6 Giulianotti, Richard et al, “Contested States and the Politics of Sport: The Case of Kosovo — Division, Development, and Recognition” (2017) 9 Intl J Sport Policy & Politics 121;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Brentin, Dario & Tregoures, Loïc, “Entering through the Sport’s Door? Kosovo’s Sport Diplomatic Endeavours towards International Recognition” (2016) 27:2 Diplomacy and Statecraft 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Crawford, James R, The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) at 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Ibid at 44; Lauterpacht, Hersch, Recognition in International Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1947) at para 2; Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, [1949] ICJ Rep 174 at 180.Google Scholar

9 Charter of the United Nations, 26 June 1945, Can TS 1945 No 7, art 4(1).

10 26 December 1933, 165 LNTS 19, no 3802.

11 Grant, Thomas D, “Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and Its Discontents” (1999) 37 Colum J Transnatl L 403 at 434.Google Scholar

12 Crawford, supra note 7 at 61.

13 Vidmar, Jure, Democratic Statehood in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2013) at 41 [Vidmar, Democratic Statehood].Google Scholar

14 Crawford, supra note 7 at 61; Shaw, Malcolm N, International Law, 7th ed (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014) at 147: “[T]he essence of such capacity is independence.”Google Scholar

15 Ibid at 62. Independence was also put forward as a condition of statehood alongside political organization and practical effectiveness by Hans Kelsen in 1941. Kelsen, Hans, “Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations” (1941) 35 Am J Intl L 605 at 607–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Crawford, supra note 7 at 67, 72.

17 Ibid at 88.

18 Declaration on Yugoslavia and on the Guidelines on the Recognition of New States, 16 December 1991, 31 ILM 1485 (1992); see also Conference on Yugoslavia Arbitration Commission, Opinions on Questions Arising from the Dissolution of Yugoslavia, 11 January and 4 July 1992, 31 ILM 1488 (1992) (also known as the Badinter Arbitration Committee).

19 Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, [2010] ICJ Rep 403 at 602, 617.Google Scholar

20 Crawford, supra note 7 at 90.

21 Grant, supra note 11 at 447.

22 Vidmar, Democratic Statehood, supra note 13 at 42; see generally Crawford, supra note 7 at 107–55.

23 Crawford, supra note 7 at 157–73.

24 Grzybowski, Janis, “To Be or Not to Be: The Ontological Predicament of State Creation in International Law” (2017) 28 EJIL 409 at 426–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217 at para 141 [Reference re Secession].

26 Vidmar, Democratic Statehood, supra note 13 at 50. It is possible that a new state is created by the combining of two existing states — such as a reunified Korea. However, this situation would be a voluntary decision by the states involved and unlikely to create the problems of recognition we otherwise see.

27 Ibid; Vidmar, Jure, “Territorial Integrity and the Law of Statehood” (2012) 44 Geo Wash Intl L Rev 697 at 707–08Google Scholar [Vidmar, “Territorial Integrity”]; Reference re Secession, supra note 25 at para 122.

28 Vidmar, “Territorial Integrity,” supra note 27 at 734.

29 Ibid at 736.

30 Thomas Worster, William, “Law, Politics, and the Conception of the State in State Recognition Theory” (2009) 27 BU ILJ 115 at 119;Google Scholar Erman, Eva, “The Recognitive Practices of Declaring and Constituting Statehood” (2013) 5 Intl Theory 129 at 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Lauterpacht, supra note 8 at para 1.

32 Worster, supra note 30 at 124–36.

33 Vidmar, Democratic Statehood, supra note 13 at 44, 50.

34 Crawford, supra note 7 at 21–22.

35 Worster, supra note 30 at 148–52.

36 Reference re Secession, supra note 25 at para 141.

37 Crawford, supra note 7 at 5.

38 Vidmar, Democratic Statehood, supra note 13 at 49.

39 Vidmar, “Territorial Integrity,” supra note 27 at 742.

40 Chen, Lung-chu, An Introduction to Contemporary International Law: A Policy-Oriented Perspective, 3rd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015) at 42.Google Scholar

41 Grzybowski, supra note 24 at 430.

42 Ibid at 431.

43 Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It” (1992) 46 Intl Org 391 at 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Katzenstein, Peter J, Keohane, Robert O & Krasner, Stephen D, “International Organization and the Study of World Politics” (1998) 52 Intl Org 645 at 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Nafziger, James AR, “International Sports Law: A Replay of Characteristics and Trends” (1992) 86:3 AJIL 489 at 491 [Nafziger, “International Sports Law”].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 Brunneé, Jutta & Toope, Stephen J, “International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law” (2000) Colum J Transnatl L 39 at 65.Google Scholar

47 See e.g. Brunneé, Jutta & Toope, Stephen J, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010) at 92–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Vidmar, “Territorial Integrity,” supra note 27 at 701.

49 Searle, John R, The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press, 1995) at 27.Google Scholar

50 Erman, supra note 30 at 133.

51 Grzybowski, supra note 24 at 431.

52 Vidmar, Democratic Statehood, supra note 13 at 47, 49; see also Reference re Secession, supra note 25 at para 142.

53 Kelsen, supra note 15 at 608.

54 Cottrell, M Patrick & Nelson, Travis, “Not Just the Games? Power, Protest and Politics at the Olympics” (2011) 17 European J Intl Relations 729;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Allison, Lincoln & Monnington, Terry, “Sport, Prestige and International Relations” (2002) 37 Government and Opposition 106;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Taylor, Trevor, “Sport and World Politics: Functionalism and the State System” (1988) 43 Intl J 531 at 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 Central Council of Physical Recreation, The Report of the Wolfenden Committee: Sport and the Community (London: Central Council of Physical Recreation, 1960) at 73.Google Scholar

56 Rofe, J Simoin, “Sport and Diplomacy: A Global Diplomacy Framework” (2016) 27:2 Diplomacy & Statecraft 212 at 213–15;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Levermore, Roger & Budd, Adrian, “Introduction: Sport and International Relations: Continued Neglect?” in Roger Levermore & Adrian Budd, eds, Sport and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2004) 6 at 6–7.Google Scholar

57 The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has claimed that four billion people watched the 2004 Summer Olympic Games, although this figure is likely inflated. Zimbalist, Andrew, Circus Maximus: The Economic Gamble Behind Hosting the Olympics and the World Cup (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2015) at 56.Google Scholar

58 Allison & Monnington, supra note 54 at 133.

59 Grix, Jonathan & Michael Brannagan, Paul, “Of Mechanisms and Myths: Conceptualizing States’ ‘Soft Power’ Strategies through Sports Mega-Events” (2016) 27:2 Diplomacy and Statecraft 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60 Cottrell & Nelson, supra note 54 at 731; Allison & Monnington, supra note 54 at 124.

61 Bertoli, Andrew D, “Nationalism and Conflict: Lessons from International Sports” (2017) 61 International Studies Quarterly 835 at 843, 846–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Gauthier, Ryan, The IOC, Law, and Accountability (Oxford: Routledge, 2017) at 108.Google Scholar

63 Chappelet, Jean-Loup & Kübler-Mabbott, Brenda, The International Olympic Committee and the Olympic System: The Governance of World Sport (Oxford: Routledge, 2008) at 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 See Duval, Antoine, “Lex Sportiva: A Playground for Transnational Law” (2013) 19 Eur LJ 822 at 828–30;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Foster, Ken, “Is There a Global Sports Law?” (2003) 2 Entertainment Law 1 at 2;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Foster, Ken, “Global Administrative Law: The Next Step for Global Sports Law?” Social Science Research Network(2012), online: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2057750>;Google Scholar Casini, Lorenzo, “Sports Law: A Global Legal Order?” Social Science Research Network (2012), online: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2079857>; Nafziger, “International Sports Law,” supra note 45 at 493–94, 518.Google Scholar

65 For more on the Olympic movement, see Gauthier, supra note 62 at 47–51; see also Chappelet & Kübler-Mabbott, supra note 63 at 9–10. The usual caveat applies when speaking about many professional sporting leagues in North America and Australia, amongst others, which are not part of the transnational Olympic movement.

66 IOC, Olympic Charter (Lausanne: IOC, 2016), rule 1.1 [Olympic Charter].

67 Ibid, rule 27.6.

68 “One in Seven Olympic Committees Are Directly Linked to Governments,” PlaytheGame (8 June 2017), online: <http://www.playthegame.org/news/news-articles/2017/0311_one-in-seven-olympic-committees-are-directly-linked-to-governments/>; Chappelet & Kübler-Mabbott, supra note 63 at 54.

69 CAS, Code of Sports-related Arbitration: In Force as from 1 January 2017 (2018) at R47 [CAS, Code of Sports-related Arbitration].

70 Football Association of Serbia v Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), CAS 2006/A/4602 at para 42 [Football Association of Serbia].

71 CAS, Code of Sports-related Arbitration, supra note 69 at S13.

72 E.g., CAS, List of CAS Arbitrators by Nationality (April 2018), online: <http://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Liste_des_arbitres_par_nationalite_2018_04.pdf>.

73 CAS, Code of Sports-related Arbitration, supra note 69 at S14.

74 For the IOC, see Olympic Charter, supra note 66, rule 15.1; for UEFA, see Union of European Football Associations, UEFA Statutes (Nyon: Union of European Football Associations, 2016), art 1(1).Google Scholar

75 Olympic Charter, supra note 66, rule 16.1.2.

76 See Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), FIFA Statutes (Zurich: Fédération Internationale de Football Association, 2016), art 26.1 [FIFA Statutes].Google Scholar

77 See Bousfield, Dan & Michel Montison, Jean, “Transforming an International Organization: Norm Confusion and the International Olympic Committee” (2012) 15 Sport in Society 823 at 825–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78 Geeraert, Arnout, Sports Governance Observer 2015: The Legitimacy Crisis in International Sports Governance (Aarhus: PlaytheGame, 2015), online: <https://www.playthegame.org/knowledge-bank/downloads/sports-governance-observer-2015/7fd77e86-1f84-4d77-b19d-a9ce00b1c2b8>;Google Scholar Pielke, Roger Jr, “How Can FIFA Be Held Accountable?” (2013) 16 Sport Management Review 255; Gauthier, supra note 62 at 4–6, 66–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

79 World Anti-Doping Agency, Constitutive Instrument of Foundation of the Agence Mondiale Antidopage/World Anti-Doping Agency (2014), art 6, online: <https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/WADA-Revised-Statutes-4-July-2014-EN.pdf >..>Google Scholar

80 Lewis, Adam et al, Challenging Sports Governing Bodies (West Sussex, UK: Bloomsbury, 2016) at 37–43; Gauthier, supra note 62 at 58–63.Google Scholar

81 Gauthier, supra note 62 at 138–45, in regard to hosting the Olympic Games.

82 Allen Guttmann, “Sport, Politics and the Engaged Historian” 38:3 Journal of Contemporary History 363 at 371–72.

83 O’Neill, Barbara, “International Sports: Have States Succeeded Athletes as the Players?” (1988) 6 Dickinson J Intl L 403 at 413;Google Scholar Nafziger, James AR & Strenk, Andrew, “The Political Uses and Abuses of Sports” (1977–1978) 10 Conn L Rev 259 at 260. For a political look at the modern games, seeGoogle Scholar Boykoff, Jules, Power Games: A Political History of the Olympic Games (Brooklyn: Verso, 2016).Google Scholar

84 IOC, ed, The Speeches of President Avery Brundage (Lausanne: IOC, 1968) at 10.

85 Nafziger, “International Sports Law,” supra note 45 at 498. For a discussion on the effectiveness of the boycott, see Douglas Booth, “Hitting Apartheid for Six? The Politics of the South African Sports Boycott” (2003) 38:3 Journal of Contemporary History 477.

86 Christopher Boden, “IOC’s Bach Says Sports and Politics Do Mix,” San Diego Tribune (20 September 2014), online <http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-iocs-bach-says-sports-tied-to-politics-2014sep20-story.html>.

87 Houlihan, Barrie, Sport and International Politics (Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994) at 21.Google Scholar

88 Murray, Stuart & Pigman, Geoffrey A, “Mapping the Relationship between International Sport and Diplomacy” (2014) 17:9 Sport in Society 1098 at 1101 (discussing various examples).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89 Jules Boykoff has written extensively on this topic. See e.g. Boykoff, Jules, Activism and the Olympics: Dissent at the Games in Vancouver and London (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2014) at 165 (describing anti-Olympic activism as less directed at the games per se than as a “moment of movements”); see alsoGoogle Scholar Lenskyj, Helen, Inside the Olympic Industry: Power, Politics, and Activism (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2000).Google Scholar

90 Grix, Jonathan, Sport Politics: An Introduction (London: Palgrave, 2016) at 39–41:CrossRefGoogle Scholar “The ‘Nazi Olympics’ (or ‘Hitler Olympics’) is widely recognized as the first and most blatant use of sport for political purposes.”

91 O’Neill, supra note 83 at 414; Baker, Catherine, “Beyond the Island Story?: The Opening Ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games as Public History” (2014) 19 Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 409.Google Scholar

92 See van Hilvoorde, Ivo, Elling, Agnes & Stokvis, Ruud, “How to Influence National Pride? The Olympic Medal Index as a Unifying Narrative” (2010) 45 Intl Rev Sociology Sport 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

93 The hosting of the Olympics by Rome (1960), Tokyo (1964), and Munich (1972) are seen as a “rehabilitation” of the Second World War “Axis Powers” in the international community. Black, David R & Van Der Westhuizen, Janis, “The Allure of Global Games for ‘Semi-Peripheral’ Polities and Spaces: A Research Agenda” (2004) 25 Third World Quarterly 1195 at 1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

94 Houlihan, Barrie & Zheng, Jinming, “Small States: Sport and Politics at the Margin” (2015) 7:3 J Sport Policy & Politics 329 at 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95 Chappelet & Kubler-Mabbott, supra note 63 at 130.

96 10 June 1958, 330 UNTS 38. For an example of a CAS award upheld by a domestic jurisdiction, see Gaitlin v US Anti-Doping Agency, 2008 WL 2567657 (ND Fla 2008), which found that even though the CAS award was “arbitrary and capricious,” the award should be upheld.

97 Case 36/74, Walrave and Koch, [1974] ECR 1405 (finding that sport was subject to European Union (EU) law insofar as it constitutes an “economic activity”); Mutu et Pechstein c Suisse, Appl nos 40575/10 and 67474/10, ECHR 324 (2 October 2018) (applying the European Convention on Human Rights to mandatory arbitration clauses and to the organization and procedures of the CAS); see also Weatherill, Stephen, Principles and Practice in EU Sports Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) at 91–92 (discussing the “conditional autonomy” of sport under EU law).Google Scholar

98 Nafziger, James AR, “International Sports Law” in Nafziger, James AR & Ross, Stephen F, eds, Handbook on International Sports Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011) 3 at 14–15;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Mitten, Matthew J & Opie, Hayden, “Sports Law: Implications for the Development of International, Comparative, and National Law and Global Dispute Resolution” (2010) 85 Tul L Rev 269 at 315;Google Scholar Beloff, Michael J, Kerr, Tim & Demetriou, Marie, Sports Law (Oxford: Hart, 1999) at 7–12.Google Scholar

99 McLaren, Richard H, “The Court of Arbitration for Sport” in Nafziger, James AR & Ross, Stephen F, eds, Handbook on International Sports Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011) 32 at 47–50.Google Scholar

100 Duval, Antoine, “The ‘Victory’ of the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the European Court of Human Rights: The End of the Beginning for the CAS,” Asser International Sports Law Blog (10 October 2018), online: <http://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-victory-of-the-court-of-arbitration-for-sport-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights-the-end-of-the-beginning-for-the-cas>.Google Scholar

101 Ruggie, John G, “For the Game: For the World,” FIFA and Human Rights (2016) at 36–37, online: <https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/programs/cri/files/Ruggie_humanrightsFIFA_reportApril2016.pdf>; Gauthier, supra note 62 at 84–86.Google Scholar

102 CAS, Code of Sports-related Arbitration, supra note 69 at R58.

103 USOC and USA Canoe/Kayak/IOC, CAS Ad Hoc Division OG 00/001 (2000) at para 19 (citing Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v Guatemala), [1955] ICJ Rep 1).

104 USOC and USA Canoe/Kayak/IOC, supra note 103 at para 15.

105 Angel Perez/International Olympic Committee, CAS Ad Hoc Division OG 00/005 (2000) at para 6.

106 Ibid at paras 14–17.

107 Ibid at paras 20–24.

108 Ibid at paras 33–34.

109 Ibid at para 18; In the Matter Angel Perez, Award, CAS Ad Hoc Division OG 00/009 (2000).

110 Olympic Charter, supra note 66, rule 6.1; see Richard Espy, The Politics of the Olympic Games (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981) at 163–64; O’Neill, supra note 83 at 413, discusses the “inherent paradox” of the rules; James AR Nafziger, “The Regulation of Transnational Sport Competition: Down from Mount Olympus” (1971) Vand J Transnatl L 180 at 202.

111 Olympic Charter, supra note 66, rule 40; see also O’Neill, supra note 83 at 414.

112 E.g., a South Sudanese athlete, Guor Marial, competed under the Olympic flag in the 2012 Summer Olympic Games, as South Sudan had not yet had its National Olympic Committee recognized.

113 E.g., Indian athletes competed under the Olympic flag when their National Olympic Committee was suspended for the 2014 Winter Olympic Games, while Russian athletes competed as “Olympic Athletes from Russia” during the 2018 Winter Olympic Games while the Russian Olympic Committee was suspended.

114 These entities are American Samoa, Aruba, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Cook Islands, Guam, Hong Kong, Kosovo, the Palestinian Authority (designated “Palestine”), Puerto Rico, Taiwan (designated “Chinese Taipei”), and the United States Virgin Islands (designated “Virgin Islands”).

115 Olympic Charter, supra note 66, rule 34.1.

116 Ibid.

117 Cornelissen, Scarlett, “The Geopolitics of Global Aspiration: Sport Mega-Events and Emerging Powers” (2010) 27 International Journal of History of Sport 3007 at 3011; see alsoCrossRefGoogle Scholar Hill, Christopher R, “Keeping Politics in Sport” (1996) 52 World Today 192 at 192–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Although some decolonizing states sought to chart their own path with the “Games of the New Emerging Forces” (GANEFO), this was a short-lived affair with only one major event. Chris A Connolly, “The Politics of the Games of the New Emerging Forces (GANEFO)” (2012) 29 Intl J History Sport 1311.

118 Houlihan, supra note 87 at 71.

119 Ibid at 71–72.

120 Dennis, Mike & Grix, Jonathan, Sport under Communism: Behind the East German ‘Miracle’ (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2012) at 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

121 O’Neill, supra note 83 at 418.

122 Ibid.

123 Houlihan, supra note 87 at 72.

124 Grix, supra note 90 at 42.

125 See e.g. Eckstein, Ruth, “Ping Pong Diplomacy: A View from Behind the Scenes” (1993) 2:3 J American-East Asian Relations 327;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Itoh, Mayumi, The Origin of Ping-Pong Diplomacy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

126 O’Neill, supra note 83 at 419; Houlihan, supra note 87 at 74–75.

127 Mastrocola, Paul, “The Lords of the Rings: The Role of Olympic Site Selection as a Weapon against Human Rights Abuses: China’s Bid for the 2000 Olympics” (1995) 15 Boston College Third World LJ 141 at 147;Google Scholar O’Neill, supra note 83 at 419.

128 IOC, Olympic Review (Lausanne: IOC, 1979) at 562.

129 Chan, Gerald, “The ‘Two-Chinas’ Problem and the Olympic Formula” (1985) 58 Pub Aff 473 at 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

130 Ren-Guey v Olympic Games, 72 AD 2d 439, 424 NYS 2d 535 (App Div 1980), aff ’d, Ren-Guey v Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc, 49 NY 2d 771, 403 NE 2d 178, 426 NYS 2d 473 (App Ct 1980). During the 1984 Los Angeles Summer Olympics, there was a lawsuit that sought to compel the recognition of the Baltic states. Individuals from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania sought to participate in the various cultural events related to the games. These entities were represented by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics at the games. Similar to Ren-Guey, the court found that the issue was non-justiciable as a political question. Spindulys v Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee, No B009941 (Cal Ct Appm, 3 December 1985).

131 Nafziger, “International Sports Law,” supra note 45 at 498.

132 Grzybowski, supra note 24 at 427–28.

133 Lekakis, Nikos, “Can Football Loosen the ‘Gordian Knot’ in Cyprus?” (2015) 7:2 Intl J Sport Policy & Politics 255 at 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

134 Ibid at 270.

135 Summers, James, “Kosovo” in Christian Walter, Antje von Ungern-Sternberg & Kavus Abushov, eds, Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) 235 at 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

136 Although the lines between republic and province had become blurred by that point, so this issue is somewhat unclear. Ibid at 237.

137 Ibid at 238.

138 UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) on the Deployment of International Civil and Security Presences in Kosovo, UN Doc S/RES/1244 (1999).

139 Summers, supra note 135 at 243.

140 Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, [2010] ICJ Rep 403 at 452.

141 Ibid at 436.

142 Reference re Secession, supra note 25 at para 141: “It is true that international law may well, depending on the circumstances, adapt to recognize a political and/or factual reality, regardless of the legality of the steps leading to its creation.”

143 First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalization of Relations (2013), online: <http://www.rts.rs/upload/storyBoxFileData/2013/04/20/3224318/Originalni%20tekst%20Predloga%20sporazuma.pdf>; see also Dana M Landau, “The Quest for Legitimacy in Independent Kosovo: The Unfulfilled Promise of Diversity and Minority Rights” (2017) 45:3 Nationalities Papers 442 at 448; Piotr Smolar, “Serbia and Kosovo Sign Historic Agreement,” The Guardian (30 April 2013), online <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/30/serbia-kosovo-historic-agreement-brussels>.

144 Letter from Muhamet Berisha to IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch (4 December 1995) (on file with the IOC Library).

145 UN Security Council Resolution 757 on Bosnia and Herzegovina, UN Doc S/RES/757 (1992), art 8(b).

146 Mills, Richard, “‘It All Ended in an Unsporting Way’: Serbian Football and the Disintegration of Yugoslavia, 1989–2006” (2009) 26:9 Intl J History Sport 1187 at 1203–04, 1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

147 Giulianotti et al, supra note 6 at 131.

148 Ibid at 128–31.

149 Union of European Football Associations, UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations (2015), online: <https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Tech/uefaorg/General/02/26/77/91/2267791_DOWNLOAD.pdf>..>Google Scholar

150 Union of European Football Associations, supra note 74, art 1(1). Code civil Suisse du 10 décembre 1907, art 60.

151 Ibid, art 12(1).

152 Ibid, arts 21(1), 23(2).

153 Although the CAS did reduce the ban from six years to four years. Michel Platini c Fédération Internationale de Football Association, CAS 2016/A/4474 (2016).

154 “UEFA Congress Approves Good Governance Reforms,” UEFA (5 April 2017), online: <http://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/mediaservices/newsid=2455199.html>.

155 Union of European Football Associations, supra note 74, art 5(1).

156 Gibraltar Football Association (GFA)/Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), CAS 2002/O/410 (2002) at para 38.

157 Gibraltar Badminton Association (GBA)/International Badminton Federation (IBF), CAS 2001/A/329 (2001).

158 Ibid at para 5.

159 Union of European Football Associations, supra note 74, art 5(1).

160 Gibraltar Football Association (GFA)/Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), CAS 2002/O/410 (2002) at para 17.

161 “Kosovo Relishing the Future,” UEFA (accessed 29 April 2018), online: <http://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/member-associations/association=kos/index.html>. For more on Yugoslavian football, see Richard Mills, The Politics of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nationalism and the State (London: IB Tauris, 2018).

162 By comparison, the vote to recognize the Kosovo National Olympic Committee (NOC) by the IOC was unanimously in favour. Minutes of the Meeting of the 127th IOC Session (Monaco, 8–9 December 2014) at 34.

163 Football Association of Serbia, supra note 70 at para 37.

164 Ibid at para 38. There was also an argument made by the Football Association of Serbia (Fudbalski Savez Srbije or FSS) that its freedom of association rights under EU law were violated, but this argument was summarily dismissed by the CAS. Ibid at 134–36.

165 Ibid at para 101.

166 Ibid, citing Irish Football Association (IFA) v Football Association of Ireland (FAI), Daniel Kearns and Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), CAS 2010/A/2071 (2010) at para 20.

167 Ibid at para 106, citing Union of European Football Associations, supra note 74, art 5(1).

168 Football Association of Serbia, supra note 70 at para 107.

169 Ibid at para 108.

170 Charter of the United Nations, supra note 9, art 4(1).

171 Football Association of Serbia, supra note 70 at para 114.

172 Ibid at para 115.

173 Ibid at para 116.

174 Ibid at paras 112–13.

175 Ibid at para 123.

176 Ibid at para 124.

177 Ibid.

178 Ibid at paras 126–28.

179 Ibid at para 129.

180 Ibid at para 130.

181 Court of Arbitration for Sport, Code of Sports-related Arbitration, supra note 69 at R37.

182 Of peripheral interest, the first UEFA Champions League game for a Kosovar team, Trepça ’89, was against Víkingur Gøta of the Faroe Islands, one of the non-state members of UEFA.

183 The flag was listed, alongside the flags of Taiwan, Somaliland, Western Kurdistan, and even the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, as banned from stadiums. Tariq Panja, “Thanks to Politics, Not All Flags Are Allowed to Wave inside the Stadiums,” New York Times (14 July 2018) at SP5.

184 Gibson, Owen, “UEFA Defends Decision Not to Keep Serbia and Albania Apart after Brawl,” The Guardian (15 October 2014), online: <https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/oct/15/uefa-defends-decision-serbia-albania-mass-brawl>.Google Scholar

185 Ibid.

186 Nafziger, James AR, “Spectator and Other Supporter-Induced Violence: Albanian and Serbian Football before the Court of Arbitration for Sport” in Stefan Lorenzmeier & Hans-Peter Folz, eds, Recht und Realität: Festschrift für Christoph Vedder (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2017) 891 at 898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

187 Ibid.

188 Football Association of Albania v UEFA & Football Association of Serbia, CAS 2015/A/3874 (2015) at para 197. UEFA also penalized the Albanian team with a three-to-zero forfeit of the match, but this penalty was overturned by the CAS.

189 Ibid at para 239.

190 Ibid at para 248.

191 Ibid at para 251.

192 Ibid at para 256.

193 Football Association of Serbia v UEFA, CAS 2015/A/3875 (2015) at paras 127–28.

194 Ibid at para 133.

195 “Police Arrest Man behind ‘Greater Albania’ Drone Stunt ahead of Serbia Match,” DW.com (7 October 2015), online: <https://www.dw.com/en/police-arrest-man-behind-greater-albania-drone-stunt-ahead-of-serbia-match/a-18766704>.

196 Gibson, supra note 184.

197 Zivanovic, Maja, “Rising Serbia-Kosovo Tension Damages Sporting Contacts,” BalkanInsight (8 May 2018), online: <http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-kosovo-issue-influencing-sport-events-05-07-2018>.Google Scholar

198 Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, “Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?” (2007) 23:3 Arbitration International 357 at 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

199 Ibid at 365–66.

200 Beloff et al, supra note 98 at 7–12; Mitten & Opie, supra note 98 at 315.

201 See Kaufmann-Kohler, supra note 198 at 373.

202 To borrow from the famous advice from comedian Steve Martin, to “be so good they can’t ignore you.” Steve Martin, “Advice from Steve Martin,” YouTube (15 August 2015), online: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teAvv6jnuXY>.

203 On the Budget of the Republic of Kosovo for Year 2018, Law no 06/L-020, Schedule 3.2 at 38–42, online: <https://mf.rks-gov.net/desk/inc/media/ED82668F-DF99-42A3-A3ED-DE85125C56BC.pdf> (setting out an investment of €15–20 million each year between 2018 and 2020 for the construction and renovation of sport facilities).

204 FIFA Monitoring Committee: Israel-Palestine, “Report by Committee Chairman Mr Tokyo Sexwale,” Medium (27 October 2017) at para 2.3, online: <https://medium.com/@daoudkuttab/full-text-of-tokyo-sexwale-chairmans-report-to-fifa-on-palestine-israel-53c27c909a5b>.

205 Ibid at para 2.7.

206 Ibid at paras 5.1–5.3. FIFA Statutes, supra note 76.

207 FIFA, “FIFA Council Statement on the Final Report by the FIFA Monitoring Committee Israel-Palestine,” FIFA (27 October 2017) online: <https://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/news/y=2017/m=10/news=fifa-council-statement-on-the-final-report-by-the-fifa-monitoring-comm-2917741.html>.

208 Chaplin, Mark, “‘Exciting Period’ in Prospect,” UEFA (4 December 2014), online: <https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/about-uefa/executive-committee/news/newsid=2191323.html>.Google Scholar

209 Walker, Shaun, “Football in Crimea: The Club Split in Two by Russia’s Invasion,” The Guardian (11 June 2018), online: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/11/crimea-football-russia-annexation-divided-tavria-simferopol>.Google Scholar

210 NF Board, “Football Associations Members of the N.F.-Board,” N.F. Board (22 April 2017), online: <http://nfbwebsite.wixsite.com/nfboard/fa>..>Google Scholar

211 CONIFA, “FAQ” (accessed 24 July 2018), online: <http://www.conifa.org/en/about-us/faq/>..>Google Scholar

212 CONIFA, “CONIFA Members” (accessed 24 July 2018), online: <http://www.conifa.org/en/members/>..>Google Scholar

213 Kosovo remains the only former Yugoslav republic without a top-level domain name, while the .yu domain for Yugoslavia was deleted in 2010. Anat Ben-David, “What Does the Web Remember of Its Deleted Past? An Archival Reconstruction of the Former Yugoslav Top-Level Domain” (2016) 18:7 New Media and Society 1103 at 1103, 1108.

214 Bilefsky, Dan, “Kosovo Attains Status (on Facebook) It Has Sought for Years: Nation,” New York Times (12 December 2013), online: <https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/13/world/europe/kosovo-seeking-recognition-follows-the-crowd-to-facebook-social-media.html>.Google Scholar

215 Quoted in Kirner, Julia, “What Next for Sports in Kosovo?” Kosovo 2.0 (22 March 2017) online: <http://kosovotwopointzero.com/en/next-sports-kosovo/>.Google Scholar

216 For more, see Shachar, Ayelet, “Picking Winners: Olympic Citizenship and the Global Race for Talent” (2011) 120 Yale LJ 2088.Google Scholar

217 Nafziger, James AR, “Rights and Wrongs of and About Nationality in Sports Competition” in Paulussen, C et al eds, Fundamental Rights in International and European Law (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2016) 309 at 321, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

218 IOC, Official Report of the 2nd Summer Youth Olympic Games: Nanjing 2014 (2015) at 26–27, online: <https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/Games/YOG/Summer-YOG/YOG-Nanjing-2014-Youth-Olympic-Games/Official-Report-Nanjing-2014.pdf#_ga=2.62080302.388388695.1497471844-1153672533.1493935285>..>Google Scholar

219 Grix, supra note 90 at 103.

220 Duval, supra note 64.