Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:47:20.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Berlin versus Vienna: Disagreement about Anschluss in the Winter of 1918–1919

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Duane P. Myers
Duane P. Myers
Affiliation:
Francis Marion College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On November 12, 1918, three days after Germany had been declared a republic in Berlin, the Provisional National Assembly of the German population of Austria unanimously declared in Vienna that “German-Austria is a constituent part of the German Republic.” Had the declaration been accepted as more than a statement of intent, diplomatic relations between the two independent states would have been replaced by German-Austrian participation in the German government. In fact, the two governments continued to function independently and relations between them were conducted primarily through their respective foreign ministries despite the declaration of union (Anschluss). Moreover, just as conflicts between Berlin and Vienna had plagued the alliance between the German and Austro- Hungarian empires during World War I, disagreements about the Anschluss marred relations between the new German and Austrian republics in the weeks following the armistices of 1918. While the governments in both capitals desired the unification of the two states, there was discord between them about the procedure to follow to secure it. During the winter of 1918–19 Berlin and Vienna narrowed the differences between them about questions of tactics, but fundamental disagreement about the ultimate importance of Anschluss was never completely overcome. An examination of the disagreement between the two governments and its partial resolution may shed light on the complexity of the Anschluss issue, both as a problem of the peace settlements of 1919 and as background to the annexation of Austria by Germany in 1938.

Type
Articles
Information
Central European History , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1972 , pp. 150 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kelsen, Hans, ed., Die Verfassungsgesetze der Republik Deutsch-Österreich (Vienna, 1919–1920), I, 29.Google Scholar

2. Recent articles which view the Anschluss question of 1918–1919 in different perspective or offer different conclusions are: Dumin, Frederick, “The Problem of an Austro-German Union in 1918–1919,” Research Studies (Washington State University), XXXII, No. 1 (03 1964), 1–20;Google ScholarKozeński, Jerzy, “The Problem of an Austro-German Union in 1918–1919,” Polish Western Affairs, III, No. 1 (1967), 96–133;Google ScholarLow, Alfred D., “Austria between East and West: Budapest and Berlin, 1918–1919,” Austrian History Yearbook, IV–V (1968–1969), 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. For a detailed account of the origins of German Anschluss policy, see Kogan, Arthur G., “Genesis of the Anschluss Problem: Germany and the Germans of the Hapsburg Monarchy in the Autumn of 1918,” Journal of Central, European Affairs, XX, No. 1 (04 1960), 24–50.Google Scholar

4. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 682, Oct. 2, 1918, Politisches Archiv des Auswärtigen Amts, Bonn (hereafter cited as AA), Österreich 95, Bd. 25; Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 691, Oct. 3, 1918, AA, Österreich 70, Bd. 53; Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 730, Oct. 11, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

5. Solf to Wedel, Oct. 19, 1918, AA, Österreich 95 geh., Bd. 7.

6. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 806, Oct. 21, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25; Wedel to Solf, Oct. 22, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 9.

7. For the final events leading to the Anschluss declaration, see Bauer, Otto, Die Österreichische Revolution (Vienna, 1923), pp. 95–103;Google ScholarGoldinger, Walter, Geschichte der Republik Österreich (Vienna, 1962), pp. 17–22;Google ScholarKleinwaechter, Friedrich F. G., Von Schönbrunn bis St. Germain: Die Entstehung der Republik Österreich (Graz, 1964), pp. 88–97.Google Scholar Excerpts from the important Staatsrat deliberations on Nov. 9 and 11 are found in Brügerl, Lidwig, Geschichte der Österreichischen Sozialdemokratie (Vienn, 1922–1925), v, 390–96.Google Scholar

8. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 296, Nov. 13, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

9. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1028, Nov. 17, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

10. Bauer, , Österreichische Revolution, p. 143.Google Scholar

11. Wolffs Telegraphisches Büro, No. 3210, Nov. 14, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

12. Wolffs Telegraphisches Büro, No. 3234, Nov. 16, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25. The German Foreign Office files contain no record of the two telegrams between Bauer and Haase other than copies of the texts distributed by the Wolff news agency.

13. Cabinet minutes, Nov. 15, 1918, Bundesarchiv, Koblenz (hereafter cited as BA), R43 1/1324.

14. Marginal note, Nov. 20, 1918, to the text cited in n. 12.

15. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1028, Nov. 17, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

16. Schotte, Walter, “Grossdeutschland und Deutsch-Österreich,”Google Scholar AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26. Schotte, who enjoyed close contact with members of the Foreign Office, sent a copy of his report to the Foreign Office Austrian specialist, Diego von Bergen, on Dec. 2, 1918.

17. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1028, Nov. 17, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

18. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1062, Nov. 27, 1918, Report No. 303, Nov. 30, 1918; Report No. 305, Dec. 6, 1918; AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

19. “Deutsch-Österreich und Deutschland,” Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, No. 588, 11 18, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25. In Vienna the Arbeiter-Zeitung carried the article without comment, No. 316, Nov. 19, 1918.Google Scholar

20. See the views sent by the German Minister in Bern to Berlin: Romberg to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 2060, Nov. 6, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

21. Foreign Office to Ministers in Bern, Tel. No. 1830; The Hague, Tel. No. 892; Copenhagen, Tel. No. 811; Stockholm, Tel. No. 1441; Nov. 19, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

22. Brockdorff-Rantzau (Copenhagen) to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 897, Nov. 21, [1918]; Rosen (The Hague) to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 907, Nov. 22, 1918; Lucius (Stockholm) to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1419, Nov. 22, 1918; Romberg (Bern) to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 2113, Nov. 24. 1918; AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

23. Romberg to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 2113, Nov. 24, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

24. Passages from the minutes of the conference which relate to Hartmann's appearance are found in Miller, Susanne, ed., Die Regierung der Volksbeauftragten, 1918–19 (Düsseldorf, 1969), I, 166.Google Scholar

25. Ritter, Gerhard A. and Miller, Susanne, eds., Die deutsche Revolution, 1918–1919: Dokumente (Frankfurt/Main, 1968), pp. 371–72.Google Scholar

26. Goldinger, , Geschichte der Republik, p. 68;Google Scholar see also the biography of Hartmann by Bauer, Stephan in Neue Österreichische Biographie (Vienna, 1923 ff.), III, 197–209.Google Scholar

27. Memorandum of telephone conversation with Hartmann, unsigned, Nov. 29, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

28. Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, No. 609, 11 30, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.Google Scholar

29. Memorandum, unsigned, Nov. 28, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 25.

30. Ball, M. Margaret, Post-War German-Austrian Relations: The Anschluss Movement, 1918–1936 (Stanford, 1937), p. 12;Google ScholarMeyer, Henry Cord, Mitteleuropa in German Thought and Action, 1918–1945 (The Hague, 1955), p. 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. Hartmann to Bauer, Report No. 1056, Dec. 31, 1918, Haus-, Hof-und Staatsar-chiv, Vienna, Neues Politisches Archiv (hereafter cited as HHStA), K. 109.

32. ibid.

33. “Interview mit Dr. Ludo Hartmann,” Berliner Tageblatt, No. 620, 12 4, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.Google Scholar

34. Michaelis, Herbert and Schraepler, Ernst, eds., Ursachen und Folgen: Vom deutschen Zusammenbruch 1918 und 1945 bis zur staatlichen Neuordnung Deutschlands in der Gegenwart. Eine Urkunden- und Dokumentensammlung zur Zeitgeschichte (Berlin, 1958ff.), III, 205–206.Google Scholar

35. ibid., p. 184.

36. Purlitz, Friedrich, ed., Deutscher Geschichtskaleder: Die Deutsche Revolution (Leipzig, n.d.), 1, 366.Google Scholar

37. Neumann, Sigmund, Die Parteien der Weimarer Republik (new ed., Stuttgart, 1965), pp. 41–42.Google Scholar

38. Michaelis, and Schraepler, , eds., Ursachen und Folgen, III, 197.Google Scholar

39. ibid., p. 202.

40. “Die Bedrohung des Deutschtums in Deutsch-Österreich,” Alldeutsche Blätter, No. 49, 12 7, 1918;Google Scholar see also Kruck, Alfred, Geschichte des Alldeutschen Verbandes, 1890–1939 (Wiesbaden, 1954), p. 152.Google Scholar

41. Heuss, Theodor, Friedrich Naumann: Der Mann, das Werk, die Zeit (Stuttgart, 1937), p. 632.Google Scholar

42. Schotte, , “Grossdeutschland und Deutsch-Österreich” (above, n. 16).Google Scholar

43. Michaelis, and Schraepler, , eds., Ursachen und Folgen, III, 239–42.Google Scholar

44. Wedel to Foreign Office, Tel. No. 1075, Dec. 1, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

45. Solf to Wedel, Tel. No. 1392, Dec. 3, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

46. Solf to Wedel, Tel.No. 1404, Dec. 8, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

47. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 303, Nov. 30, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

48. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 305, Dec. 6, 1918, AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 10.

49. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 310, Dec. 19, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

50. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 311, Dec. 24, 1918, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

51. German-Austria, “Denkschrift über die internationale, politische und wirtschaftliche Stellung der deutsch-österreichischen Republik,” AA, Österreich 103, Bd. 11. Bauer, Otto, “Eine Zollunion?”, Arbeiter-Zeitung, No. 352, 12 25, 1918.Google Scholar

52. German-Austria, “Denkschrift.”

53. ibid.

54. Haupt to Bauer, Tel. No. 1002, Dec. 24, 1918, HHStA, K. 109.

55. Bauer to Haupt, Tel. No. 14, n. d., HHStA, K. 109.

56. Haupt's position is found in three messages to Bauer: Tel. No. 1014, Dec. 27, 1918; Tel. No. 1016, Dec. 28, 1918; Report without number, Dec. 31, 1918; HHStA, K. 109.

57. Bauer to Haupt, Tel. No. 20, Dec. 19, 1918, HHStA, K. 109.

58. Bauer to Hartmann, Jan. 3, 1919, HHStA, K. 109.

59. Wedel to Foreign Office, Report No. 3, Jan. 2, 1919, AA, Österreich 95, Bd. 26.

60. Cabinet minutes, Dec. 27, 1918, BA, R43 1/1325.

61. Cabinet minutes, Dec. 31, 1918, BA, R43 1/1325.

62. Minutes of a joint session of Cabinet and Central Council, Dec. 31, 1918, BA, R43 1/1325.

63. Dumin, , “Austro-German Union,” pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

64. Hartmann to Bauer, Report No. 8, Jan. 5, 1919, HHStA, K. 109.

65. Quoted by Stephan Bauer, “Hartmann,” p. 208.

66. Holborn, Hajo, “Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Early Weimar Republic,” The Diplomats, 1919–1939, ed. Gordon, A. Craig and Felix, A. Gilbert (Princeton, 1953), pp. 133–34;Google ScholarEdgar, Stern-Rubarth, Graf Brockdorff-Rantzau: Wanderer zwischen zwei Welten (Berlin, 1929), pp. 78–79;Google ScholarZimmermann, Ludwig, Deutsche Aussenpolitik in der Ära der Weimarer Republik (Göttingen, 1958), p. 49.Google Scholar

67. Hartmann to Bauer, Report No. 1056, Dec. 31, 1918, HHStA, K. 109.

68. von Brockdorff-Rantzau, Ulrich Graf, Dokumente und Gedanken um Versailles (3rd ed., Berlin, 1925), p. 37.Google Scholar