Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2008
Since the nineteenth century, cleanliness and hygiene have played an integral role in the construction of bourgeois subjectivity and notions of self-governance in Europe. Drawing on this reservoir of potential signification, the spread of a mass consumer society in the twentieth century has capitalized on commodified images of health, hygiene, and cleanliness, while the maintenance and representation of clean bodies for modern men and women became virtually inseparable from consumption. The Nazis both accelerated and gave a racial spin to the idea of a clean, healthy body as the symbol of racially superior, socially productive, and sexually virile Aryans. Whether commodified and sexualized under consumerism or channeled into a murderous project under the Nazis, hygienic and healthy bodies became the object of pleasure and a signifier of superior social and racial identity. When these considerations are taken into account, it is important to inquire into the problems faced by the founding fathers of the GDR with regard to questions of health and consumption. The vision of the socialist “New Man” and the ideal of pure and healthy living that were so frequently invoked in the early years of the GDR must be seen as attempts to forge a positive identity for the new socialist state while avoiding the twin ideological dangers posed by the memory of Nazi racial policies and the implicit connections made between health, consumption, and freedom in the pluralistic consumer society to the west.
1. Vigarello, Georges, Concepts of Cleanliness, trans. Birrell, Jean (Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholar; MacKaman, Douglas, Leisure Settings: Bourgeois Culture, Medicine, and the Spa in Modern France (Chicago, 1998)Google Scholar. On Germany in particular, see Frey, Manuel, Der reinliche Bürger: Entstehung und Verbreitung bürgerlicher Tugenden in Deutschland, 1760–1860 (Göttingen, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frevert, Ute, Krankheit als politisches Problem 1770–1880 (Göttingen, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bergdolt, Klaus, Leib und Seele:Eine Kulturgeschichte des gesunden Lebens (Munich, 1999)Google Scholar; Löneke, Regina and Spieker, Ira, eds., Reinliche Leiber—schmutzige Geschäfte: Körperhygiene und Reinlichkeitsvorstellungen in zwei Jahrhunderten (Göttingen, 1996)Google Scholar.
2. Pritchard, Gareth, The Making of the GDR 1945–53: From Antifascism to Stalinism (Manchester, 2000), 228Google Scholar. See also Ross, Corey, Constructing Socialism at the Grass-Roots: The Transformation of East Germany, 1945–65 (New York, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Merkel, Ina, Utopie und Bedürfnis: Die Geschichte der Konsumkultur in der DDR (Cologne, 1999), 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the East German economy in the 1960s, see Steiner, André, “Von ‘Hauptaufgabe’ zu ‘Hauptaufgabe’: Zur Wirtschaftsentwicklung der langen 60er Jahre in der DDR,” in Dynamische Zeiten: Die 60er Jahre in den beiden deutschen Gesellschaften, ed. Schildt, Axel, Siegfried, Detlef, and Lammers, Karl Christian (Hamburg, 2000), 218–47.Google Scholar
4. Deputy Minister of Health Walter Friedeberger in his conversation with Dr. Spengler of the German Hygiene Museum on 4 June 1960. BAB (Bundesarchiv Beriin), DQ 1/2098. Friedeberger was the director of the German Hygiene Museum Dresden from 1951 to 1959.
5. Thränhardt, Rolf, “Eine gesunde Lebensweise ist das Ziel,” Alles für Deine Gesundheit 5 (1961): 1.Google Scholar
6. Cited, in 75 Jahre Deutsches Hygiene-Museum in der DDR (Dresden, 1987), 35.Google Scholar
7. Harsch, Donna makes a similar point in “Society, the State, and Abortion in East Germany, 1950–1972,” American Historical Review 102, no. 1 (02 1997): 53–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Linse, Ulrich, “Völkisch-rassische Siedlungen der Lebensreform,” in Handbuch zur “Völkischen Bewegung” 1871–1918, ed. Puschner, Uwe, Schmitz, Walter, and Ulbricht, Justus H. (Munich, 1996), 398–401.Google Scholar
9. Letter frorn Dr. Klingler of the Eden cooperative to the Ministry of Health, 30 September 1959, BAB:DQ1/6017.
10. See the court decision in BAB: DQ1/6017.
11. For more on modernization in the two Germanys, see Siegfried, Schildt, and Lammers, , eds., Dynamische ZeitenGoogle Scholar; Moeller, Robert, ed., West Germany under Construction: Politics, Society, and Culture in the Adenauer Era (Ann Arbor, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schildt, Axel and Sywottek, Arnold, eds., Modernisierung im Wiederaufbau: Die westdeutsche Gesellschaft der 50er Jahre (Bonn, 1998)Google Scholar; Steiner, André, Die DDR- Wirtschaftsreform der sechziger Jahre: Konflikt zwischen Effizienz- und Machtkalkül (Berlin, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Eberhardt, Willy to the Ministry of Health, 13 01 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
13. Response by the Volkswirtschaftsrat to the Ministry of Health, cited in Thränhardt, to Eberhardt, , 17 02 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
14. Thrähardt, to Knobbling, , 22 12 1966, BAB: DQ1/5175.Google Scholar
15. Thränhardt, to Stier, Frau, 9 11 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
16. Thränhardt, to Stölzner, Frau, 9 08 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
17. Müller, Kurt to NBI, 14 12 1964, BAB: DQ1/5175.Google Scholar
18. Schlak, Wilhelm (Magdeburg) to Neue Berliner Illustrierte (no date), BAB, DQ1/6017Google Scholar
19. Proctor, Robert, The Nazi War on Cancer (Princeton, 1999).Google Scholar
20. See Brandt's, Allan forthcoming book, The Rise and Fall of the Cigarette (New York, 2002).Google Scholar
21. For more on this, see Hilton, Matthew, Smoking in British Popular Culture 1800–2000 (Manchester, 2000), chap. 5.Google Scholar
22. For a feminist interpretation of women's smoking, see Greaves, Lorraine, Smoke Screen (Halifax, 1996).Google Scholar
23. There is no systematic study of the role of smoking in German popular culture. For a brief survey, however, see Hanseknann, Irmgard, “Zigaretten, Ärzteschaft und Sucht im Spannungsfeld von Politik und Krieg (1900–1950)” (Ph.D. diss., University of Tübingen, 1991)Google Scholar. On the British antitobacco movement, see Lock, S., Reynolds, L. A. and Tansey, E. M., eds., Ashes to Ashes: The History of Smoking and Health (Amsterdam, 1998).Google Scholar
24. “Geliebter Qualm,” Freie Presse (Karl-Marx-Stadt), 16 10 1965.Google Scholar
25. Leichter, Howard M., Free to be Foolish: Politics and Health Promotion in the United States and Great Britain (Princeton, 1991), 115.Google Scholar
26. For more, see Hilton, , Smoking in British Popular Culture.Google Scholar
27. Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR (1979): 275Google Scholar, cited in Ruban, Maria Elisabeth, Gesundheitswesen in der DDR (Berlin, 1981), 85Google Scholar. According to the same source, in West Germany the per capita consumption of cigarettes in 1978 was 2,012; this was much higher than the corresponding figure for East Germany (1,683).
28. The ratio between men and women in this lung cancer mortality study was 10:1. “Gutachten” by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Sektion fur Kanzerogenese und Grundlagen der Krebstherapie (December, 1964), BA: DQ1/5175. See also Bahrmann, E., “Klare Zahlen zum Tabakschaden,” Deine Gesundheit 6, no. 2 (1960): 12–13Google Scholar. In 1967, at least three-quarters of the 7,500 deaths from lung cancer were attributable to cigarette smoking, according to “Tabak-Alkohol-Arzneimittelmissbrauch,” BAB: DQ 1/3614. According to a 1965 survey by Heidelberg University, in West Germany six times as many men died of lung cancer as women, and between 1940 and 1965 the level of lung cancer mortality increased 275 percent for men and only 61 percent for women. Most striking was the large increase in female mortality since the 1950s. In West Germany smoking was increasing fastest among women; in 1925 women had made up only 1 percent of all smokers; this had risen to 4 percent by 1930 and 58 percent in 1950 “Raucherkrebs hält reiche Ernte: Westdeutsche Mediziner registrieren Zunahme des Lungenkrebs bei Frauen,” Tribüne 2 September 1965, BA: DQ1/3614.
29. The trend was similar in West Germany. See “Zigaretten im Vormarsch,” Der Spiegel 4 (1964): 61.Google Scholar
30. Thränhardt in his reply to an inquiry made by a reader (W. Haustein) of the magazine, Deine Gesundheit. The letter was forwarded to the Ministry of Health in January 1967. BAB: DQ1/2433.
31. The Department of Health Education in the Ministry of Health sent a few letters to the Deutsche Fernsehfunk protesting against unrestrained use of tobacco and alcohol in television programs. See, for example, Thränhardt to DFF, Reinicke, Intendanzbereich Kunst- und Kulturpolitik. 9 March 1966, BAB: DQ1/5175.
32. Letter from the editor Frau von Heute to the Health Ministry (September 6, 1957). While this letter generated a lively reaction among the paper's readers, the Health Ministry called on these women to be patient, arguing that male smokers “will be won over through reasonable arguments.” Prof. Dr. Farchmin at the Health Ministry to Presse-Referat, 9 September, 1957, BAB: DQ1/5929.
33. Letter from the Ministry of Health, Department of Occupational Health Protection to Pressereferat of the Ministry of Health, 25 July 1957, BAB: DQ1/5929.
34. Nebel, Erika to the Ministry of Health, 7 12 1961, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
35. Petitions (Eingaben) constitute one important source for scholars of the former GDR. For more on the nature and value of petitions as historical sources, see Lüdtke, Alf and Becker, Peter, eds., Akten — Eingaben — Schaufenster: Die DDR und ihre Texte (Berlin, 1997)Google Scholar; Merkel, Ina, ed., “Wir sind doch nicht die Mecker-Ecke der Nation”: Briefe an das DDR-Fernsehen (Cologne, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mählberg, Felix, “Konformismus oder Eigensinn? Eingaben als Quelle zur Erforschung der Alltags-geschichte der DDR,” in Mitteilungen aus der kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung (MkF) 19 (1996): 331–45Google Scholar; and Mühlberg, , “Wenn die Faust auf den Tisch schlägt: Eingaben als Strategie zur Bewältigung des Alltags,” in Wunderwirtschaft: DDR-Konsumkultur in den 60er Jahren, ed., Neue Gesellschaft für bildende Kunst (Cologne, 1996), 175–84.Google Scholar
36. Prells, Otto in response to Neue Berliner Illustrierte, 27 01 1958, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
37. Thränhardt, to Redaktion, of Neue Zeit (no date [1966]), BAB: DQ1/5175.Google Scholar
38. Petition letter to the Ministry of Health, signed by Kurt Richter, 26 October 1965, BAB:DQ1/3614.
39. Cited in letter by Willi Patzig (Heil- u. Sportmasseur) to Thränhardt, 31 July 1965, BAB:DQ1/3614. According to Patzig, this case was originally reported in Sozialversicherung-Arbeitsschutz in 1964.
40. Alcoholism was defined as “foreign and alien behavior” that was harmful to the socialist state. Spode, Hasso, “‘Der Charakter des Rausches hatte sich total verändert.’ Historische Voraussetzungen der Alkohohlismusprävention: Deutsches Reich, Bundesrepublik und DDR,” in Hauptsache Gesund! Gesundheitsaufklärung zwischen Disziplinierung und Emanzipation, ed. Roessiger, Susanne and Merk, Heidrun (Marburg, 1998), 113.Google Scholar
41. Ruban, , Gesundheitswesen in der DDR, 87.Google Scholar
42. Thränhardt, to Rakobrandt, Gerhard, 18 10 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
43. The reply by the Ministry of Health to Horst Murawsky, 15 October 1965, BAB:DQ1/3614.
44. Thränhardt, to Pfau, Ernst, 17 07 1967, BAB: DQ1/2433.Google Scholar
45. Thränhardt, to Müller, Gerhard, 14 07 1961Google Scholar. And Thränhardt, to Patzig, , 24 08 1965, BAB: DQ1/6017Google Scholar. See also Thränhardt, to Redaktion, BZ am Abend, 24 08 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
46. Thränhardt, to Simon, Frau, 25 05 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
47. The Ministry of Health clearly differentiated between alcoholism and “nicotinism.” The authorities defined alcoholism as a “genuine illness” (echte Krankheit) that required clinical treatment, which was itself covered by health insurance. In contrast, the drug, Lobelin, which was designed to help people overcome nicotine addiction, was not covered by insurance in part because the government felt that making people pay for this medication themselves would provide a strong incentive to give up smoking. See Thränhardt's reply to Frau Stier, a pharmacist in Karl-Marx-Stadt, 9 November 1965, BA: DQ1/3614. Like alcohol and tuberculosis, there was a link between smoking and productivity in terms of the cost of medical treatment, work time lost, and indirect harm to the health and working conditions of nonsmokers.
48. Many citizens wanted to (re-)establish voluntary health-reform and antismoking associations, but the government criticized such groups as unscientific and superstitious organizations that existed only in an individualistic, bourgeois society.
49. Rakobrandt, Gerhard to Redaktion, der Wochenpost, 3 10 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
50. Beuthner, Frau L. 4 08 1961, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
51. Thaa, Winfried, Häuser, Iris, Schenkel, Michael, and Meyer, Gerd, Gesellschaftliche Differenzierung und Legitimitätsverfall des DDR-Sozialismus: Das Ende des anderen Wegs in der Moderne (Tübingen, 1992): 9–10Google Scholar. See also Solga, Heike, Auf dem Weg in eine klassenlose Gesellschaft? Klassenlagen und Mobilität zwischen Generationen in der DDR (Berlin, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Müller, Edith, 21 10 1962, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
53. Dittrich, G. to Reichsbahn, , 21 11 1961, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
54. Smers, Hans-Peter to the Ministry of Health, 6 11 1965, BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
55. However, according to the Health Ministry, even though the GDR had the highest cigarette prices in the Eastern block, the country also had the highest per capita cigarette consumption among the European socialist countries. Ministry, Health to Krell, Lotte, 20 01 1966, BA:DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
56. Prasse, Werner, 5 01 1965, in his response to the article “Rauchen – Selbstmord,” BAB: DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
57. Steudte, Otto to the Ministry of Health 12 01 1967Google Scholar, Zscherpe, Werner to the Ministry of Health 23 01 1960Google Scholar, Schröder, W. to the Ministry of Health, 10 03 1958, BA: DQ1/6017Google Scholar. See also Prasse, Werner to the Ministry of Health, 1 05 1965Google Scholar, Eberhardt, Willy to the Ministry of Health, 13 01 1965, BA:DQ1/3614.Google Scholar
58. Frau S. did not forget to relate in her letter “How happily I think back on the time (I'm now 52 years old) when one could shop without constraints and when shopping bags were printed with the words ‘Eat more fruit and you'll stay healthy.’ These words weren't a hollow slogan …” It is the responsibility of the state, and especiaily the public health authorities, to spend no money for poison, but rather for fruit, tropical fruits, almonds and nuts, in order to finally respond to the huge demand and the much too small supply.” Elfriede Steude 28 October 1958, BAB: DQ1/6017.
59. The VII. Parteitag (1967) gave a gendered corporeal identity to this abstract ideal type; this new person was, among others, “a carefully coiffed nonsmoker with a white shirt and tie.” Thaa, Winfried, Häuser, Iris et al. , Gesellschaftliche Differenzierung, 51.Google Scholar
60. According to Kurt Starke, a leading East German sexologist, the Wall led to an “usconsciousness” (ein Wir-Bewusstsein): which meant that “the other is increasingly viewed not as a competitor, enemy or stranger, but as a companion in suffering and in health.” Consequently, “love and sexuality represented a free space and an unencumbered relationship with a tightly enclosed/regulated society.” Cited in Kolano, Uta, Nackter Osten (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1995), 86, 89Google Scholar. Eroticism and sex tend to take center stage in East German remembrances of the GDR. See Rohnstock, Katrin, ed., Erotik macht die Hässlichen schön (Berlin, 1995)Google Scholar, and Engler, Wolfgang, Die Ostdeutschen: kunde von einem verlorenen Land (Berlin, 1999).Google Scholar
61. Fenk, Elisabeth to the Ministry of Health 29 11 1966, BAB: DQ1/5175.Google Scholar
62. Nebel, Erika to the Ministry of Health 7 11 1961, BAB: DQ1/6017.Google Scholar
63. The development of new attitudes toward hygiene, sexuality, consumption, and other forms of bodily pleasure, as well as novel methods for regulating these practices, have played an important role in the constitution of the modern individual, and, beyond the immediate political context of the period, the antismoking policies of the regime also need to be situated within this broader framework.
64. Hong, Young-sun, “Modernity and the Historiography of the German Welfare State, 1870–1945,” paper presented at the 2001 conference of the German Studies Association.Google Scholar