Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:57:55.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1980 Hague Convention: The Need for an Advocacy Response to Protect Children in the Context of International Parental Child Abduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

Helen Freris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper will focus on the practice of social work within the context of an international Hague Convention concerning children: the 1980 Hague Convention on The Civil Aspects of International Parental Child Abduction. After describing the programmes of International Social Service (ISS) Australia, this organisation's existing approaches to working with families affected by international parental child abduction will be specifically discussed as an example of practice within the context of that Convention. The paper highlights the benefits of social work practice and mediation-based services for families. Dilemmas of practice within a legal framework will then be considered, with particular reference to the trap of uncritical implementation of social work practice as a social control agent of the judicial system. Potential social work contributions in the area of analysis and critique through the perspectives offered by gendered analysis, human rights and children's rights, and the tradition of advocacy as an integral sphere of practice will be discussed, with the paper arguing that for social work to best meet the needs of children affected by this legislation, it must perform its vital functions of social and political critique, and individual and systemic advocacy.

Keywords

Childrenrightsprotectionparental abductionlegislation
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 38 , Special Issue 4: A SPECIAL ISSUE ON INTERNATIONAL FAMILY MOBILITY (AND THE BROADER FAMILY LAW CONTEXT) , December 2013 , pp. 149 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: an arena of struggle. Social Work, 43 (6), 512–526.Google Scholar
Alston, P., & Gilmour-Walsh, B. (1996). The Best Interests of the Child: Towards a Synthesis of Children's Rights and Cultural Values. UNICEF, Inocente Foundation.Google Scholar
Cemlyn, S., & Briskman, L. (2003). Asylum, children's rights and social work, Child and Family Social Work, 8 (3), 163–178.Google Scholar
Doel, M. (1994). Task-centred work. In Hanvey, C. & Philpot, T. (eds.) Practicing Social Work (pp.22–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. (2002). In the best interests of internationally abducted children: Plural, singular, neither or both, International Family Law, 20 (5), 77–85.Google Scholar
Hague Conference on Private International Law (2009). 1980 Hague Convention Status Table, Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.status&cid=24.Google Scholar
Hague Conference on Private International Law (undated). 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction – Outline. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24.Google Scholar
Hudson, A., Ayensu, L., Oadley, C., & Patocchi, M. (1994). Practising feminist approaches. In Hanvey, C., & Philpot, T. (eds.) Practicing Social Work (pp. 93–106). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
International Federation of Social Workers (2004). Ethics in Social Work: Statement of Principles. International Federation of Social Workers, Retrieved from http://www.ifsw.org/f38000032.html.Google Scholar
Kaye, M. (1999). The Hague Convention and the flight from domestic violence: How women and children are being returned by coach and four, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13 (2), 191–212.Google Scholar
Nicholes, S. (2009). Family court spreads cloak of protection, Law Institute of Victoria Journal, 83 (8), 32.Google Scholar
O'Hagan, K. (1994). Crisis intervention, changing perspectives. In Hanvey, C. & Philpot, T. (eds.), Practicing Social Work, (pp.134–146), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reddaway, J., & Keating, H. (1997). Child abduction: Would etc protecting vulnerable children drive a coach and four through the principles of the Hague Convention?, International Journal of Children's Rights, 5 (1) 77–96.Google Scholar
Shetty, S., & Edleson, G. (2005). Adult domestic violence in cases of international parental child abduction, Violence Against Women, 11 (1) 115–138.Google Scholar
Strom, A. (2002). International Child Abduction: Domestic Violence on the Global Arena, Lund University, Sweden: School of Social Work, Unpublished Thesis, Retrieved from http://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=24965&postid=1357671.Google Scholar
Tuohey, A. (2012). International Parental Child Abduction and Domestic Violence, International Social Service Australia, Melbourne, Unpublished.Google Scholar
Vesneski, W. M., Lindhorst, T., & Edleson, J.L. (2011). U.S. judicial implementation of the Hague Convention in cases alleging domestic violence, Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 62 (2) 1–21.Google Scholar
Wiener, M. H. (2000). International child abduction and the escape from domestic violence, Fordham Law Review, 69 (2) 593–706.Google Scholar
Witkin, S. L. (1998). Human rights and social work. Social Work, 43 (3), 197–202.Google Scholar