Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:45:30.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Judges getting the Full Story through Court-ordered Reports and Investigations? A Critical Analysis of the Discourse of Disbelief in an Allegation of Child Sexual Abuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Pamela D. Schulz
Pamela D. Schulz*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Research Fellow University of South Australia, School of Communication International Studies and Languages
*
address for correspondence: Dr Pamela D. Schulz OAM, Adjunct Research Fellow, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471 UniSA, Adelaide SA 5000. E-mail: pamela.schulz@unisa.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The care and protection of children takes a different turn when there are allegations of child sexual abuse in a custody battle in the Family Court. In the case referred to in this discourse analysis, two 4- and 5-year-old sisters disclosed incest to a number of people. These were the police, their mother and maternal grandmother, as well as to 12 other people, including contact supervisors and a psychologist. In cases of this kind, the court may ask relevant experts to provide reports in order to decide what action will be in the ‘best interests’ of the children. The following is an analysis of the conversation between the investigating police officer, the social worker and the mother. It shows that mindsets become evident when discourse analysis is applied, and indicates that judges may not be receiving appropriate and comprehensive information or, indeed, ‘the full story’. Discourse analysis, in this instance, suggests that courts could become more aware of other issues at play within interlocutory situations, which may, in fact, determine a child's wellbeing more than is evident before the bench.

Keywords

for the study Child ProtectionInvestigationDiscourseLanguageDiscourse of DisbeliefCourts
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 137 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altheide, D. (1996 reprinted 2000). Qualitative media analysis. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Atkins, A. (2002). Critical discourse analysis: A letter to expatriates from the Rt Hon. Sir Norman Fowler MP. Retrieved from www.cels.bham.ac.uk/resources/essays (accessed 16 November 2012).Google Scholar
Berk, L. (2013). Child development. New York: Pearson Education Publications.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (2012). Child protection: The essential guide. Melbourne: Jo Jo Publishing.Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.) (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Carmody, T. (2013). The Queensland Child Protection Royal Commision of Inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.childprotectioninquiry.qld.gov.au/ (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
Darnall, D. (1997). Symptoms of Parental Alienation Syndrome [various articles]. Retrieved from http://www.parentalalienation.org/articles/symptoms-parental-alienation.html (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. (1997). The story of discourse. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 35–62). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Debelle, B. (2013). Royal Commission 2012–2013 Report of Independent Education Inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/educationinquiry/files/links/DebelleInquiry.pdf (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge Oxford Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. & Yates, S. (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 236–266). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview from structured questions to negotiated text. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 23–46). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). The order of discourse. In Shapiro, M. (Ed.), The Language of Politics. Oxford Blackwell New York; Pantheon And also cited in Fairclough (2003) ‘Analysing Discourse’ Textual Analysis for Social Research London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G. (1997). The politics of the judiciary (5th ed.). London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herman, J. L. (1981). Father daughter incest. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In Flood, J. (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension Newark DE International Reading Association Publication.Google Scholar
Layton, R. (2003). Our best investment: A state plan to protect and advance the interests of children. Review into Child Abuse in South Australia. Retrieved from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/speced2/files/links/Child_Protection_Review_FU.pdf (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (1998). Analysing verbal data: Principles, methods and problems. In Tobin, K. & Fraser, B. (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. New York and Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Loschper, G. (2000). Crime and social control as fields of qualitative research in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1119/2482 (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
McClellan, P. (in preparation). Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Abuse. Retrieved from http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/about-us/terms-of-reference (accessed 6 November 2013).Google Scholar
Moran, L. (2013). Mass media open justice: Courts and judicial reports in the press in England and Wales. Legal studies, 34 (1), 143–166. Oxford: Society of Legal Scholars. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12011/abstract (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
Mullighan, E. (2006). Commission of inquiry of children in State Care. South Australian Government Report. Retrieved from http://www.sa.gov.au/subject/Crime,±justice±and±the±law/Mullighan±Inquiry/Children±in±state±care (accessed 15 June 2014).Google Scholar
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analysing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. D. (2010). Courts and judges on trial: Analysing and managing the discourses of disapproval. London: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. D. (2012). Family, courts and media discourses: The contested spaces of time, and the politics of the protection of children. Children Australia, 37 (4), 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P. D., & Cannon, A. (2011). Public opinion, media, judges and the discourse of time. Journal of Judicial Administration, 21 (1), 8–18.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. D., & Cannon, A. J. (2013). Trial by Tweet? Findings on Facebook? Social media innovation or degradation? The future and challenge of change for courts. The Hague: International Journal of Courts Administration.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. (2013). The role of the media in undermining trust in the legal profession. In Candlin, C. & Crichton, J. (Eds.), Discourses of trust (pp. 220–236). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, N. (2013). The good child sex offender: constructions of defendants in child sexual abuse sentencing. Unpublished Honours Thesis, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse and Society, 11 (1), 7–49.Google Scholar
The Royal Commission Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse 2012–2013 by the former Supreme Court Justice the Hon Bruce Debelle AO QC available on line at http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/educationinquiry/files/links/DebelleInquiry.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tucci, J., Mitchell, J., & Goddard, C. (2006). Community attitudes about child abuse in Australia: Out of sight, out of mind. Monash University Study by the Australian Childhood Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.childhood.org.au%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFiles%2FResearch%2FOut%2520of%2520sight%2520out%2520of%2520mind.ashx&ei=sQigUt_aDZD9oAS114GQCQ&usg=AFQjCNEEA24T5m8ETjWpzXX5KskthwCHqQ&bvm=bv.57155469,d.cGU (accessed 12 November 2013).Google Scholar
Van der Valk, R. (2003). Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse and Society, 14 (3), 309–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A multi-disciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (2003). Interdisciplinary critical discourse analysis: A plea for diversity. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Victorian Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse by Religious and other Organisations Report. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/fcdc/article/1789Google Scholar
Wigmore John Henry ‘A Supplement 1923–1933 to the Second Edition (1923) of A Treatise on the System of Evidence' – January 1934 Boston Little and Brown Publishers.Google Scholar