Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T23:37:26.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disrupted adolescents in foster care: Their perspectives on placement breakdown

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Robyn Gilbertson  and
Jim Barber
Robyn Gilbertson
Affiliation:
School of Social Administration and Social Work, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001. Email: robyn.gilbertson@flinders.edu.au
Jim Barber
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada. Email: jim.barber@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Placement breakdown has long been recognised as a serious problem in foster care, particularly for young people whose behaviour is seen as disruptive. This qualitative study conducted in South Australia examined recent unplanned placement changes (n=14) from the perspective of the young people involved Participants were eligible for the study if their social worker attributed their most recent placement move to carer request on the grounds of problem behaviour. There was a high level of agreement between participants and social workers on the problem behaviours, but a divergence of views on the reasons for the move. Participants' contextualising of their behaviour highlighted the complexity of the processes underlying placement disruption. The dominant theme to emerge from this study was the unhappiness of participants. Other problem areas noted were apparent lack of placement options, and exclusion of young people from placement decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , 2003 , pp. 25 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R., Barenblat, M., Le Prohn, N. S. & Pecora, P. (1996) Quality Service Redesign Project Child Interview Report, Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.casey.org/research/reports/reportdocs.htm Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2002) Child Protection Australia 2000-01, Child Welfare Series no. 29, Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
Babbie, E. (2001) The Practice of Social Research, (9th ed.), Belmont CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
Bandow, D. (1999) Children in Crisis, Pacific Research Institute. Retrieved 10 August, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pacificresearch.org/ Google Scholar
Barber, J. G. (2001) ‘The slow demise of alternative care in South Australia’, Journal of Social Policy, 30, 1–15.Google Scholar
Barber, J.G., Delfabbro, P. H. & Cooper, L.L. (2001) ‘The predictors of unsuccessful transition to foster care’, Journal of Child Psychiatry, 42, 785–790.Google Scholar
Berridge, D. & Cleaver, H. (1987) Foster Home Breakdown, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1997) Child Protection, St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Community Services Commission (1999) Just Solutions - state wards and juvenile justice, Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
Community Services Commission (2000) Voices of children and young people in foster care, Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
Fein, E. & Maluccio, A. N. (1992) ‘Permanency planning: another remedy in jeopardy?’, Social Service Review, Sept, 335–348.Google Scholar
Fein, E., Maluccio, A.N. & Kluger, M. (1990) No more partings: An examination of long-term foster family care, Washington DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Fernandez, E. (1999) ‘Pathways in substitute care: Representation of placement careers of children using event history analysis’, Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 177–216.Google Scholar
Festinger, T. (1983) No one ever asked us: A postscript to foster care, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fretter, J., Rowe, J., Sapsford, D. & Thoburn, J. (1991) Permanent family placement: A decade of experience, London: BAAF.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, R. & Barber, J.G. (2002) ‘Obstacles to research involving children and young people in foster care’, Child and Family Social Work, 7,253–258.Google Scholar
Hayden, C., Goddard, J., Gorin, S. & Van Der Spek, N. (1999) State Child Care, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Heptinstall, E. (2000) ‘Gaining access to looked after children for research purposes: lessons learned’, British Journal of Social Work, 30, 867–872.Google Scholar
Minty, B. (1999) ‘Annotation: outcomes in long-term foster family care’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 991–999.Google Scholar
Pardeck, J.T. (1983) ‘An empirical analysis of behavioral and emotional problems of foster children as related to replacement in care’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 75–78.Google Scholar
Pardeck, J.T. (1984) ‘Multiple placement of children in foster family care: an empirical analysis’, Social Work, Nov-Dec, 506–509.Google Scholar
Rushton, A., Dance, C. & Quinten, D. (2000) ‘Findings from a UK based study of late permanent placements’. Adoption Quarterly, 3, 51–72.Google Scholar
Schofield, G. (2002) ‘The significance of a secure base: a psychosocial model of long-term foster care’, Child and Family Social Work, 7, 259–272.Google Scholar
Schorr, A.L. (2000) ‘The bleak prospect for public welfare’, Social Service Review, 74, 124–136.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2001) Improving services for children and young people requiring placement and support services, Retrieved on 17 August, 2003, from http://hnb.dhs.vic.gov.au/4A25673000078E04/BCView/B2EF93384F0BF84F4A256ADB001BE206?OpenDocument Google Scholar
Stone, M.N. & Stone, S.F. (1983) ‘The prediction of successful foster placement’, Social Casework, 64, 11–17.Google Scholar