Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:01:53.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of and Reasons for Infrequent Internet Use: A Qualitative Exploration of Australian Youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Sora Park
Sora Park*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, Bruce, 2601 ACT, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Sora Park, Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, Bruce, 2601 ACT, Australia E-mail: sora.park@canberra.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While there is a popular belief that the digital generation is immersed in and adept at using digital media, recent studies point to a large variation among young people in their appropriation of digital technologies. This study examined the patterns of, and reasons for, infrequent use of digital technology among the younger generation, by conducting semi-structured interviews with 19 school-aged Australian youth. Infrequent users focused narrowly on a small number of applications and did not explore the wide range of available activities. This was mainly due to their lack of confidence and the perceived irrelevance of digital technologies to their lives. Most participants in this study had chosen a vocational path where computers and the internet were not integral to their everyday learning experience. This deterred them from improving their digital media literacy. Based on observations, I argue that it is not sufficient merely to provide access to digital media; rather, users need motivation, skills and perceived benefits in order to utilise this technology fully. In the case of school-aged youth, schoolwork as well as their peer group culture influences how they situate themselves in the digital environment that surrounds them.

Keywords

youthinternet usersinfrequent usersdigital literacydigital generation
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Australian social trends: Children of the digital revolution. Retrieved from http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/LookupAttach/4102.0Publication29.06.117/$File/41020_Childrendigital_Jun2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2013). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2012–13. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/8146.0Chapter12012-13Google Scholar
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775–786.Google Scholar
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanovic, A. (2010). Understanding the new digital divide: A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123–138.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2008). Success through partnership: Achieving a national vision for ICT in schools. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Neckerman, K. (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313–334.Google Scholar
Ewing, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). The internet in Australia. ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, Swinburne University. Retrieved from http://www.worldinternetproject.net/_files/_//349_ccidigitalfutures2012final20070912.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eynon, R. (2009). Mapping the digital divide in Britain: implications for learning and education. Learning, Media & Technology, 34 (4), 277–290.Google Scholar
Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2012). On the periphery? Understanding low and discontinued internet use amongst young people in Britain. Oxford, Oxford Internet Institute.Google Scholar
Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the ‘cyberkid’: Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4 (4), 451–469.Google Scholar
Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: how technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media & Society, 12 (3), 497–513.Google Scholar
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (2011). Cyberkids or divided generations? Characterising young people's internet use in the UK with generic, continuum or typological models. New Media & Society, 13 (7), 1104–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, A. (2012). The shackled school internet: Zemiological solutions to the problem of over-blocking. Learning, Media and Technology, 38 (3), 270–283.Google Scholar
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., . . . Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Building the field of digital media and learning. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
Jackson, C., Brown, J. D., & Pardun, C. J. (2008). A TV in the bedroom: Implications for viewing habits and risk behaviors during early adolescence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52 (3), 349–367.Google Scholar
James, J. (2008). Digital divide complacency: Misconceptions and dangers. The Information Society, 24 (1), 54–61.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (5), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. (2009). The role of internet engagement in the health-knowledge gap. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53 (3), 365–382.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9 (4), 671–696.Google Scholar
Longley, P., Webber, R., & Li, C. (2006). The UK geography of the e-society: A national classification. London, UK: University College London.Google Scholar
Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56 (4), 1072–1082.Google Scholar
McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people's lives. New Media & Society, 8 (1), 73–95.Google Scholar
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pedro, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERI.Google Scholar
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the ‘disappearing digital divide’ versus the ‘emerging digital differentiation’ approach. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 293–305.Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. Horizon, 9 (5), 1–6.Google Scholar
Reisdorf, B. C. (2011). Non-adoption of the internet in Great Britain and Sweden. Information, Communication & Society, 14 (3), 400–420.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, U. (2010). ICT use among 13-year-old Swedish children. Learning, Media and Technology, 35 (1), 15–30.Google Scholar
Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Towards new indicators of disadvantage: Deprivation and social exclusion in Australia. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of NSW.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6 (3), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 273–292.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Furlong, J. (2005). Whose Internet is it anyway? Exploring adults’ (non)use of the Internet in everyday life. European Journal of Communication, 20 (1), 5–26.Google Scholar
Stanley, L. D. (2003). Beyond access: Psychosocial barriers to computer literacy. Special Issue: ICTs and community networking.The Information Society: An International Journal, 19 (5), 407–416.Google Scholar
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thiessen, V., & Looker, D. E. (2007). Digital divides and capital conversion: The optimal use of information and communication technology for youth reading achievement. Information, Communication & Society, 10 (2), 159–180.Google Scholar
Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research? Media, Culture & Society, 33 (2), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdegem, P., & Verhoest, P. (2009). Profiling the non-user: Rethinking policy initiatives stimulating ICT acceptance. Telecommunications Policy, 33 (10–11), 642–652.Google Scholar
Vicente, M., & Lopez, A. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. Information Society, 26, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Wei, L. (2012). Number matters: The multimodality of Internet use as an indicator of the digital inequalities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (3), 303–318.Google Scholar
Zickuhr, K. (2010). Generations 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar