Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:09:34.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Review of Foster Carer Allowances: Responding to Recommendation 16.9 of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection (NSW)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Marilyn McHugh*
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Australia. m.mchugh@unsw.edu.au
*
*address for correspondence: Marilyn McHugh, Social Policy Research Centre, Level 3, Rupert Myers Building South Wing, UNSW 2052, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection in New South Wales, Recommendation 16.9 states: ‘Carer allowances should be reviewed periodically by an independent body and should more closely reflect the actual costs to the carer of providing care, according to the varying categories of need’ (Wood, 2008, p. 689). In 2000, estimates of the costs of foster children were developed (the Foster Care Estimates) by an ‘independent body’, the Social Policy Research Centre (SPRC). Using a budget standards approach, estimates representing the ‘basic’ subsidy were based on the costs of children not in care and adjusted to more closely reflect the day-to-day cost of fostering children in statutory care. Since 2000, the estimates have been updated annually (using the Consumer Price Index). This article examines the changes to levels of allowances for statutory foster and kinship carers in all Australian jurisdictions over the period 2000–2009. It argues that the use of the internationally recognised budget standards approach to estimate ‘actual costs to carers’ has been accepted by government and more than meets the requirements of Wood's Recommendation 16.9.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011