Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:23:32.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

S. White, M. Gibson, D. Wastell, & P. Walsh (2020). Reassessing attachment theory in child welfare. Bristol: Policy Press. ISBN 978-1-443-3692-1 paperback. pp 163. GBP 17.59 plus post.

Review products

S. White, M. Gibson, D. Wastell, & P. Walsh (2020). Reassessing attachment theory in child welfare. Bristol: Policy Press. ISBN 978-1-443-3692-1 paperback. pp 163. GBP 17.59 plus post.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2020

Frank Ainsworth
Frank Ainsworth*
Affiliation:
Senior Principal Research Fellow (Adjunct), School of Social Work and Human Services. James Cook University, Townsville campus, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Children Australia , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 64 - 65
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pinto, C. (2019). Looked after and adopted children: Applying the latest science to complex biopsychosocial formulations. Adoption and Fostering, 43(3), 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastell, D., & White, S. (2017). Blinded by science: The social implications of epigenetics and neuroscience. Bristol: Policy Press. Children Australia, 42(3), 222–223.Google Scholar
White, S., Gibson, M., & Wastell, D. (2019). Child protection and disorganised attachment: A critical commentary. Child and Youth Services Review, 105, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar