Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:09:13.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Sweden to Singapore: The Relevance of Foreign Models for China's Rise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

Kai Yang  and
Stephan Ortmann Open the ORCID record for Stephan Ortmann [Opens in a new window]
Kai Yang
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong. E-mail: eagoyang33@gmail.com.
Stephan Ortmann*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong.
*
E-mail: stephan.ortmann@cityu.edu.hk (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

China can be described as a “learning state” which has adapted to changing conditions and frequently turned outward for lessons. In recent years, Sweden and Singapore have drawn particularly strong interest from Chinese academics because the two countries represent two different “third ways” between Communism and capitalism and have been useful for developing a socialism “with Chinese characteristics.” Sweden is seen to symbolize the ideals of social equity and harmony while Singapore is seen as a model of authoritarian state-capitalism. China's transformation has resembled the Southeast Asia city state's model more than the Scandinavian social democratic model. Since Xi Jinping assumed power in 2012, interest in Sweden has reached a nadir, while attentiveness to Singapore has peaked. Although Chinese state-capitalism faces many challenges, including rising inequality and persistent corruption, it will be difficult to find an alternative role model that can successfully combine one-party rule with economic modernization.

摘要

中国可以被视为一个不断适应新形势的 “学习型国家”, 频繁地学习外部经验。近年来, 瑞典和新加坡都引起中国学术界的兴趣, 因为这两个国家分别代表两种区别于共产主义和资本主义的 “第三条道路”, 被认为对 “中国特色” 的社会主义具有启发意义。瑞典被认为是社会公平与和谐的典范, 而新加坡被视为威权型国家资本主义的模范。相对于斯堪的纳维亚式的社会民主模式, 中国的转型更类似于新加坡这个东南亚城市国家的模式。自从习近平 2012 年上台以来, 对瑞典的兴趣降至低点, 而对新加坡的关注则达到高潮。虽然中国的国家资本主义面临很多挑战, 包括贫富分化加剧和腐败横行, 目前很难找到一个替代的模式能像新加坡那样成功地实现一党政治下的经济现代化。

Keywords

Learning stateSingapore modelSwedish modelsocialism with Chinese characteristicsThird Way学习型国家新加坡模式瑞典模式中国特色社会主义第三条道路
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 236 , December 2018 , pp. 946 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnason, J. Pall. 2005. The Future That Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barr, Michael D. 2000. “Lee Kuan Yew and the ‘Asian values’ debate.” Asian Studies Review 24(3), 309–334.Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 2005. “Xiang Xinjiapo xue shenme? (What can you learn from Singapore?)” Zhongguo qingnian bao, Special Monthly Edition 11, 6.Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 2006. “Bei wudu he hulue de Xinjiapo jingyan” (The misinterpreted and ignored Singapore experience), Nanfeng chuang, 20 February, http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2006-02-20/16289153127.shtml, Accessed 14 August 2016.Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 2009. “Bei wudu de Xinjiapo” (Misinterpreted Singapore), Nanfang News, 16 September, http://view.news.qq.com/a/20090916/000008.htm. Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 2010. “Xinjiapo shi weiquanzhuyi buzhide zhongguo jiejian” (Singaporean authoritarianism is not worth China's reference), Hebei qingnian bao, 30 November, http://finance.ifeng.com/opinion/zjgc/20101130/2977432.shtml. Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Cai, Haoxiang. 2010. “Dr Goh helped shape China's economy: Zhao Ziyang's son,” The Straits Times, 19 May, http://news.asiaone.com/News/the+Straits+Times/Story/A1Story20100519-217043.html. Accessed 23 March 2017.Google Scholar
Cao, Yunhua. 2016. “Probing the ‘Singapore Fever’ phenomenon in post-1978 China,” presented at the workshop “The ‘Singapore Model’ and Its Influence on China,” City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 9 May 2016.Google Scholar
Chen, Huashan. 1994. “Lun Ruidian jingji moshi” (On the Swedish economic model). Qiushi 6, 45–50.Google Scholar
Chen, Lin. 1995. “Geming yu gailiang zhizheng de youlai he yanbian” (The origin and evolution of argumentation between revolutionalism and reformism). Jiangxi shehui kexue 7.Google Scholar
Chu, Jianzhong. 1996. “Ruidian de shiye baozhang zhidu jiqi dui woguo de qishi” (Swedish unemployment welfare system and its implications for China). Nankai guanli pinglun 4, 30–34.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce 1984. “The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences.” International Organization 38(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Deng, Xiaoping. 1992. Deng Xiaoping yu Shenzhen: 1992 Chun (Deng Xiaoping and Shenzhen: Spring 1992). Shenzhen: Haitian Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ding, Jianding. 2003. “20 shiji 80 niandai yilai Ruidian de shehui baozhang zhidu gaige” (Swedish social welfare system reform since 1980s). Guoji luntan 5, 72–77.Google Scholar
Dreyer, J. Teufel. 2015. China's Political System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duus, Peter. 1996. “Imperialism without colonies: the vision of a greater East Asia co-prosperity sphere.” Diplomacy and Statecraft 7(1), 54–72.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Julian B. 2017. Unlikely Partners: Chinese Reformers, Western Economists, and the Making of Global China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 2013. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goh, Chok Tong. 1994. “Social values, Singapore style.” Current History 93(587), 417–422.Google Scholar
Gylfason, Thorvaldur, Andersen, Torben M., Honkapohja, Seppo, Isachsen, Arne Jon, and Williamson, John. 1997. The Swedish Model under Stress: A View from the Stands. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
He, Bingmeng. 2008. “Cong ‘Ruidian moshi’ kan Ouzhou shemindang shehui minzhu zhuyi ‘zhuanxing’ de shizhi” (Probing the nature of social democracy “transition” among European social democratic parties by the “Swedish model”). Gaoxiao lilun zhanxian 4, 20–21.Google Scholar
He, Qinglian. 2015. “Mantan Zhongguo chaoye dui Xinjiapo moshi de aiyuhen” (China's love and hatred towards the Singapore model), VOA, 23 March, http://www.voachinese.com/a/heqinglian-20150323/2693141.html. Accessed 14 August 2016.Google Scholar
Ho, Benjamin. 2015. “Learning from Lee: lessons in governance for the middle kingdom from the little red dot.” East Asia 33, 133–156.Google Scholar
Holliday, Ian. 2000. “Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia.” Political Studies 48(4), 706–723. http://www.people.com.cn/GB/guandian/8213/8309/28296/2284640.html.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. “Democracy's third wave.” Journal of Democracy 2(2), 12–34.Google Scholar
Huo, Shitao. 1988. “Guanyu Ruidian shehui minzhudang ‘zhongjian daolu’ de ruogan sikao” (Some thoughts on the “middle way” of Swedish social democratic party). In Huang, Anmiao and Zhang, Xiaojin (eds.), Ruidian moshi chutan (Preliminary studies on the Swedish model). Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang People's Publishing House, 184–195.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marius B. 1970. The Japanese and Sun Yat-sen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Yun. 2016. “Xinjiapo moshi de liangge zhidian.” (Two pillars of the Singapore model). Lianhe zaobao, 27 June, http://www.80sd.org/pl/2016/06/27/105255.html. Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Junko, Oikawa. 2016. “China's social divisions and the search for a common ‘baseline’.” The Tokyo Foundation, 15 August, http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/articles/2016/search-for-common-baseline. Accessed 20 August 2016.Google Scholar
Kraar, Louis, and Yew, Lee Kuan. 1997. “A blunt talk with Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew: he's a model for China and the New Hong Kong, but he insists that ‘My job is not to be an example to anybody’,” Fortune, 4 August, http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/08/04/229722/index.htm. Accessed 10 June 2012.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 1993. Li Guangyao sishinian zhenglun xuan (Lee Kuan Yew's Political Writings of 40 Years). Beijing: Xiandai Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2000. From Third World to First: The Singapore Story, 1965–2000. Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. 2010. “Eulogy by Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew,” The Straits Times, 23 May, http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20100523-217976.html. Accessed 18 August 2016.Google Scholar
Li, He. 2002. “The role of think tanks in Chinese foreign policy.” Problems of Post-Communism 49(2), 33–43.Google Scholar
Li, He. 2015. Political Thought and China's Transformation: Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao's China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lim, Kean Fan. 2014. “‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’: uneven development, variegated neoliberalization and the dialectical differentiation of state spatiality.” Progress in Human Geography 38(2), 221–247.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar. 1997. “The Swedish experiment.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(3), 1273–1319.Google Scholar
Liu, Jianshe. 1990. “Minzhu shehui zhuyi de ‘Ruidian moshi’ pingxi” (On democratic socialism and the “Swedish model”). Xuaxiao dangjian yu sixiang jiaoyu 3, 33–36.Google Scholar
Liu, Xirui, and Duan, Longfei. 2004. “Fuwuxing zhengfu: benzhi jiqi lilun jichu (Service oriented government: nature and theoretical foundation.” Guojia xingzheng xueyuan xuebao 5, 25–29.Google Scholar
Liu, Zhonghua. 2004. “Ruidian moshi: zhongjie yihuo xinsheng.” (Swedish model: to die or to be reborn,” Renmin ribao, 7 January, http://www.people.com.cn/GB/guandian/8213/8309/28296/2284640.html. Accessed 29 March 2017.Google Scholar
Lye, Liang Fook. 2016. “Singapore's role in China's reform process: an institutional approach.” Paper presented at the workshop “The ‘Singapore Model’ and Its Influence on China,” Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, 9 April.Google Scholar
Meidner, Rudolf. 1992. “The rise and fall of the Swedish model.” Studies in Political Economy 39(1), 159–171.Google Scholar
Miao, Shubin, and Wen, Chen. 2004. “Beiou moshi: zhengfu zhineng zhuanbian he zhidu anpai-fenlan, Ruidian, danmai sanguo kaocha” (North European model: government function transformation and institutional arrangement-field trip report on Finland, Sweden and Denmark). Gaige fazhan yanjiu yuan, January, http://www.reformdata.org/index.do?m=wap&a=show&catid=301&typeid=&id=15367. Accessed 17 August 2016.Google Scholar
Misra, Kalpana. 2003. “Neo-left and neo-right in post-Tiananmen China.” Asian Survey 43(5), 717–744.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew. 2003. “Authoritarian resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
Naughton, Barry. 2017. “Is China Socialist?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Ortmann, Stephan, and Thompson, Mark R.. 2014. “China's obsession with Singapore: learning authoritarian modernity.” The Pacific Review 27(3), 433–455.Google Scholar
Ortmann, Stephan, and Thompson, Mark. R.. 2016. “China and the ‘Singapore model’.” Journal of Democracy 27(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
Pan, Peixin. 1988. “Ruidian shehui minzhudang yu tuoxie zhengzhi.” (Swedish social democratic party and compromise politics). In Anmiao, Huang and Xiaojin, Zhang (eds.), Ruidian moshi chutan. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang People's Publishing House, 144–157.Google Scholar
Pan, Wei. (ed.) 2009. Zhongguo moshi: Jiedu Zhonghua renmin gongheguo liushinian (A new development model: from the sixty years of the People's Republic). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2004. “Democracy and economic development.” In Mansfield, Edward D. and Sisson, R. (eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 300–324.Google Scholar
Quah, Jon. S.T. 1998. “Singapore's model of development? Is it transferable?” In Rowen, Henry S. (ed.), Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity. London: Routledge, 105–125.Google Scholar
Ramesh, M. 2000. “The Politics of Social Security in Singapore.” The Pacific Review 13(2), 243–256.Google Scholar
Roy, Denny. 1994. “Singapore, China, and the ‘soft authoritarian challenge’.” Asian Survey 34(3), 231–242.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert. 2010. “Concluding assessment: the Soviet impact on Chinese society.” Bernstein, Thomas P. and Li, Hua-Yu (eds.), China Learns from the Soviet Union, 1949–Present. Plymouth: Lexington, 513–520.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert. 2014. The Chinese Debate about Soviet Socialism, 1978–1985. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sautman, Barry. 1992. “Sirens of the strongman: neo-authoritarianism in recent Chinese political theory.” The China Quarterly 129, 72–102.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David. 2008. China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David. 2016. “Contemplating China's future.” The Washington Quarterly 39(3), 121–130.Google Scholar
Shen, Zhihua. 2015. Sulian zhuanjia zai Zhongguo (1948–1960) (Soviet Experts in China (1948–1960)) (third edition). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.Google Scholar
Song, Xinning. 2010. “‘European models’ and their implications to China: internal and external perspectives.” Review of International Studies 36(3), 755–775.Google Scholar
Stan, Ken. 2012. “Jiemi zhongguo haiwai guanyuan peixun.” (Unveiling Chinese cadre overseas trainings). Zhongwen wang, 6 November, http://www.bwchinese.com/article/1034747.html. Accessed 13 August 2016.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Christoph, and Zhao, Litao. 2015. “From ‘stability overrides everything’ to ‘social governance’: the evolving approach of social order in China.” In Yongnian, Zheng and Gore, Lance L.P. (eds.), China Entering the Xi Jinping Era. Abingdon: Routledge, 193–216.Google Scholar
Sun, Jingfeng. 2002. “Jiaqiang dui Xinjiapo renming xingdongdang de yanjiu” (Studies on Singapore People's Action Party should increase). Henan shifan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 29(3), 25–28.Google Scholar
Sun, Jinhua, and Da, Bangyin. 2009. “Lun Zhongguo Tese Shehui Zhuyi yu Ruidian Minzhu Shehui Zhuyi de Genben Qubie” (The fundamental difference between socialism with Chinese characteristics and Swedish democratic socialism). Jingji yanjiu daokan 31, 201–02.Google Scholar
Sun, Yang. 2014. “‘Xinjiapo moshi’ de lingyimian” (The other side of the “Singapore model”). Fenghuang zhoukan, 12 November, http://www.ifengweekly.com/detil.php?id=470. Accessed 13 August 2016.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark. R. 2010. “Japan's German path and Pacific Asia's flying geese.” Asian Journal of Social Science 38(5), 697–715.Google Scholar
Wang, Tingyou. 2008. “Ying ruhe kandai Ruidian shehuiminzhudang ji Ruidian moshi” (How to interpret Swedish Social Democratic Party and Swedish model). Lilun tantao 4, 53–59.Google Scholar
White, Gordon, and Goodman, Roger. 1998. “Welfare orientalism and the search for an East Asian welfare model.” In Goodman, Roger, White, Gordon and Kwon, Huck-ju (eds.), The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. London: Routledge, 3–24.Google Scholar
Wu, Jinsheng. 2012. Xi Jinping he Xinjiapo Moshi (Xi Jinping and Singapore model). Hong Kong: Tujing Press.Google Scholar
Xiang, Wenhua. 1999. Sikandinaweiya minzhu shehui zhuyi yanjiu (Research on Democratic Socialism in Scandinavia). Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.Google Scholar
Xiang, Wenhua, and Xuemei, Li. 2002. “20 Shiji 90 Niandai Ruidian, Yingguo de Shehui Fuli Zhidu Gaige” (Social welfare system reform in Sweden and Britain in 1990s). Guoji luntan 4, 72–77.Google Scholar
Xie, Tao. 2007. “Minzhu shehui zhuyi moshi yu Zhongguo qiantu.” (Democratic socialist model and China's future). Yanhuang chunqiu 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
Xinhua. 2007. “Lin Zexu-jindai zhongguo ‘kaiyan kanshijie diyiren’.” (Lin Zexu: the first person who opened his eyes and looked at the world), Xinhua wang, 1 January, http://news.xinhuanet.com/theory/2007-01/01/content_5551793.htm. Accessed 13 August 2016.Google Scholar
Xinhua. 2015. “Xinjiapo wei zhongguo tigong ‘yangben’.” (Singapore provides references for China), Xinhua wang, 30 November, http://history.sina.com.cn/bk/ggkfs/2015-11-30/path-ifxmazmz9011284.shtml. Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Xu, Chongwen. 2007. “Ruidian moshi de lishi jincheng he jingyan jiaoxun.” (The historical transition and lessons of Swedish model). Fudan xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 4, 15–24.Google Scholar
Yan, Chen, and Qingguan, Xu. 2013. “Zengqiang ‘Mao Zedong sixiang he zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi lilun tixi gailun’ ke shishaoxing de tansuo.” (To enhance the effectiveness of: “Introduction to Mao Ze-dong Thought and Theoretical System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics”). Jaimusi jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao 9(2), 3, 8.Google Scholar
Yang, Qixian. 2003. “Yipian chidao de kaocha jiyao: Ruidian shehui zhuyi kaocha” (A postponed field trip report on Swedish socialism). Lilun cankao 1, 42–45.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaming. 2007. “Zhongguo shijiaoxia de ‘Ruidian moshi’.” (Swedish model from China's perspective). Shehui zhuyi yanjiu 1, 136–38.Google Scholar
Yu, Mingkun. 2011. “Zhongguo de ‘Xinjiapo Re’ xiangxiang yanjiu.” (On ‘Singapore fever’ in China). Master thesis, Jinan University.Google Scholar
Yuan, Gangong. 2015. “Zhongguo zenyang xuexi ‘Xinjiapo moshi’.” (How China learns from the “Singapore model”), Helanonline, 30 March, http://helanonline.cn/archive/article/12266. Accessed 15 August 2016.Google Scholar
Yuan, Qun. 2009. “Ruidianshi shehui zhuyi yu Zhongguo tese shehui zhuyi zhi bijiao” (Comparison between Swedish socialism and socialism with Chinese characteristics). Anhui jingguan zhiye xueyuan xuebao 5, 76–78.Google Scholar
Yuan, Xia. 1996. “Shehui zhuyi moshi duanxiang” (Some thoughts on the socialist model). Shehui zhuyi yanjiu 1, 6–7.Google Scholar
Zhang, Benyan. 2012. “Jinnianlai guonei Ruidian minzhu shehui zhuyi moshi yanjiu shuping” (Summary of the domestic study on the model of democratic socialism in Sweden in recent years). Tianshui xingzheng xueyuan xuebao 1, 28–31.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chuanhe. 2009. “Ruidian Shehui Minzhudang zhengji he Ruidian chenggong yinsu xinjie” (The achievements of SAP and new interpretations for its success). Kexue shehui zhuyi 1, 132–36.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ping, and Sun, Min. 1994. Ruidian-Shehui Fuli Jingji de Dianfan (Paragon of Social Welfare Economy). Wuhan: Wuhan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuangshuang. 2011. “Zhengque renshi minzhu shehui zhuyi de ‘Ruidian moshi’.” (Correctly understanding the democratic socialist “Swedish model”). Lilun jie 6, 67–68.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 1997. “Chinese intellectuals’ quest for national greatness and nationalistic writing in the 1990s.” The China Quarterly 152, 725–745.Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 2004. A Nation-State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, Dahua. 2006. “Guanyu weiyuan de ‘shiyi changji yi zhiyi’.” (On Wei Yuan's “learning merits from the foreign to conquer the foreign”). Renmin ribao, 14 February, http://theory.people.com.cn/BIG5/49157/49163/4101988.html. Accessed 13 August 2016.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yongnian. 2004. Globalization and State Transformation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yongnian. 2007. “Zhongguo weishenme dui minzhu shehui zhuyi ganxingqu” (Why China is interested in democratic socialism), Caogen, 16 October, http://www.caogen.com/blog/Infor_detail.aspx?ID=66&articleId=4106. Accessed 25 August 2016.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yongnian. 2010. “Zhongguo yao cong Xinjiapo moshi xue shenme” (What does China want to learn from the Singapore model?). Zhongguo baodao 7, 50–55.Google Scholar
Zhu, Wenliang. 2007. “On the thought of ‘learning merits from the foreign to conquer the foreign’.” Master's thesis, Xiangtan University.Google Scholar