Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:13:44.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manoeuvring within a Fragmented Bureaucracy: Policy Entrepreneurship in China's Local Healthcare Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2018

Alex Jingwei He*
Affiliation:
Department of Asian and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong. E-mail: jwhe@eduhk.hk.

Abstract

Policy entrepreneurs play a pivotal role in policy changes in both electoral democracies and authoritarian systems. By investigating the case of healthcare reform in Sanming City, this article illustrates how the fragmented bureaucracy in China enables and constrains local policy entrepreneurs, and how entrepreneurial manoeuvring succeeds in realigning the old institutional structures while attacking the vested interests. Both structural conditions and individual attributes are of critical importance to the success of policy entrepreneurship. Four factors and their dynamic interactions are central to local policy entrepreneurship: behavioural traits, political capital, network position and institutional framework. This study furthers theoretical discussion on policy entrepreneurship by elucidating the fluidity of interactional patterns between agent and structure in authoritarian China. The malleability of rigid institutions can be considerably increased by the active manoeuvring of entrepreneurial agents.

摘要

政策企业家在政策变革中发挥重要作用,不但在选举民主国家中如此,在威权政体下亦然。本文透过分析三明医改——中国大陆医药卫生体制改革的 “明星”,揭示了中国条块分割的碎片化官僚体制如何影响地方的政策企业家推动改革。文章尤其关注政策企业家如何创造性地重组既有的体制框架,并冲破既得利益。研究发现,结构性约束和政策企业家的个人特质都对改革的成败起到关键作用,而且具有企业家精神的政策创新是一个动态的过程。四个因素及其动态互动是地方政策企业家改革的关键: 个人行为特质、政治资本、网络地位、制度框架。本研究进一步阐明了在中国的体制之下,公共政策改革中结构因素和关键行为者的互动模式,并深化了关于政策企业家的理论探讨。尽管既有体制韧性强劲,但富有企业家精神的政策活动家仍有相当的空间通过各种策略来调整制度安排,推动改革。

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng, Joseph Y.S. 2014. “Institutions, perceptions and social policy-making of Chinese local governments: a case of medical insurance policy reforms in Dongguan.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 7(1), 5870.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lingguo, Liu, Hong, Zhang, Ye, Shen, Ke and Zeng, Yi. 2015. “The impact of health insurance on health outcomes and spending of the elderly: evidence from China's new cooperative medical scheme.” Health Economics 24(6), 672691.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, Dimitrios C. 2006. “Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: a network perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 13(5), 757778.Google Scholar
Cohen, Nissim. 2016. “Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting.” In Zahariadis, Nikolaos (ed.), Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 180199.Google Scholar
Hammond, Daniel R. 2013. “Policy entrepreneurship in China's response to urban poverty.” Policy Studies Journal 41(1), 119146.Google Scholar
He, Alex Jingwei, and Meng, Qingyue. 2015. “An interim interdisciplinary evaluation of China's national health care reform.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 8(1), 118.Google Scholar
He, Alex Jingwei, and Wu, Shaolong. 2017. “Towards universal health coverage via social health insurance in China: systemic fragmentation, reform imperatives, and policy alternatives.” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 15(6), 707716.Google Scholar
Health Development Research Centre, National Health and Family Planning Commission. 2015. “2014 follow-up analysis on public hospital reform in Sanming city,” February. Hardcopy document provided to author.Google Scholar
Hsiao, William C. 1995. “The Chinese health care system: lessons for other nations.” Social Science and Medicine 8, 1047–55.Google Scholar
Hsiao, William C. 2007. “The political economy of Chinese health reform.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 2, 241–49.Google Scholar
Huang, Yanzhong. 2013. Governing Health in Contemporary China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Li, Hongbing, Xu, Jing, Wang, Fang, Wang, Bin, Liu, Liqun, Hou, Wanli, Fan, Hong et al. 2012. “Overprescribing in China: driven by financial incentives, results in very high use of antibiotics, injections and corticosteroids.” Health Affairs 31(5), 1075–82.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Oksenberg, Michel. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Meng, Qingyue, Cheng, Gang, Silver, Lynn, Sun, Xiaojie, Rehnberg, Clas and Tomson, Göran. 2005. “The impact of China's rural retail drug price control policy in hospital expenditures: a case study in two Shandong hospitals.” Health Policy and Planning 20(3), 185196.Google Scholar
Mertha, Andrew. 2009. “Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0: political pluralization in the Chinese policy process.” The China Quarterly 200, 9951012.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Norman, Phillipa. 2009. “Policy entrepreneurship and policy change.” Policy Studies Journal 37(4), 649667.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics. 2008. Bulletin of 2007 National Survey on Social Security. Beijing: NBS.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oborn, Eivor, Barrett, Michael and Exworthy, Mark. 2011. “Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy: the case of London health reform.” Public Administration 89(2), 325344.Google Scholar
Petchey, Roland, Williams, Jacky and Carter, Yvonne H.. 2007. “From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care.” Social Policy and Administration 42(1), 5976.Google Scholar
Qian, Jiwei, and He, Alex Jingwei. 2018. “The bonus scheme, motivation crowding-out and quality of the doctor–patient encounters in Chinese public hospitals.” Public Organization Review 18(2), 143158.Google Scholar
Roberts, Marc J., Hsiao, William, Berman, Peter and Reich, Michael R.. 2004. Getting Health Reform Right: A Guide to Improving Performance and Equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Nancy C., and King, Paula J.. 1991. “Policy entrepreneurs: their activity structure and function in the policy process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1(2), 147175.Google Scholar
Sanming Government. 2015. “Sanming shi gongli yiyuan zonghe gaige gongzuo baogao” (Work report on comprehensive public hospital reform in Sanming city). Hardcopy document provided to author.Google Scholar
Shearer, Jessica C. 2015. “Policy entrepreneurs and structural influence in integrated community case management policymaking in Burkina Faso.” Health Policy and Planning 30(2), ii46ii53. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv004.Google Scholar
Sun, Qiang, Santoro, Michael A., Meng, Qingyue, Meng, Caitlin and Eggleton, Karen. 2008. “Pharmaceutical policy in China.” Health Affairs 27(4), 1042–50.Google Scholar
Teets, Jessica C. 2015. “The politics of innovation in China: local officials as policy entrepreneurs.” Issues and Studies 51(2), 79109.Google Scholar
Wang, Shan, Liu, Lihua, Li, Lin and Liu, Jianchao. 2014. “Comparison of Chinese inpatients with different types of medical insurance before and after the 2009 healthcare reform.” BMC Health Services Research 14, 443. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-443.Google Scholar
Yip, Winnie C., and Hsiao, William C.. 2009. “China's healthcare reform: a tentative assessment.” China Economic Review 20, 613619.Google Scholar
Yu, Xuan, Cheng, Li, Shi, Yuhua and Yu, Min. 2010. “Pharmaceutical supply chain in China: current issues and implications for health system reform.” Health Policy 97, 815.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xufeng. 2008. “Strategies of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: challenges of ‘technical infeasibility’.” Policy Sciences 41, 315334.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yapeng. 2012. “Policy entrepreneur, civic engagement and local policy innovation in China: housing monetarisation reform in Guizhou province.” The Australian Journal of Public Administration 71(2), 191200.Google Scholar