Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:35:03.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Communist Party Candidates Can Lose, Who Wins? Assessing the Role of Local People's Congresses in the Selection of Leaders in China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2008

Melanie Manion
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article draws on Party and government documents, Chinese-language books and articles, interviews and firsthand observation, and electoral outcome data to contribute to the emerging literature on the changing role of people's congresses in mainland China. It focuses on the crucially important but neglected relationship between local congresses and local Communist Party committees in the selection of congress and government leaders. It analyses the 1995 reforms to Party regulations and the law, which resulted in electoral losses of more than 17,000 Communist Party candidates in the first set of elections after 1995. It concludes that the reforms created the conditions for local congress delegates to matter – and delegates responded. More broadly, it concludes that congressional assertiveness has significant (although not radical) implications for the relationship between the congresses and Party committees. The winners in the broader (not narrowly electoral) sense of the term are both the congresses and the ruling Communist Party, strengthened as an organization with selection of leaders opened up to more players.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 195 , September 2008 , pp. 607 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* The author gratefully acknowledges research support provided by a Fulbright Research Award and Chiang Ching-kuo Scholar Grant. She also thanks Richard Baum, Kenneth Lieberthal and participants in the Comparative Politics Workshop at Yale University and Center for Chinese Studies Research Seminar at the University of Michigan for helpful comments on an earlier draft.