Article contents
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus: An Early Congregational Version*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Extract
Ecclesiastical exclusiveness has been among the persistent historical characteristics of the Christian church as, in its various forms and by varying degreees, it has insisted on monopoly in the mediation of salvation. The Cyprianic theme of extra ecclesiam nulla salus has not lacked occasion for re-utterance throughout the centuries, whether by the pen of Augustine, Boniface VIII, Luther or Calvin, though meanings, of course, have changed in differing theological and ecclesiastical circumstances. The church as custodian of the sacraments and chief locus of the work of the Holy Spirit, the church as supreme, universal institutional authority under the rulership of the vicar of Christ, the church as proclaimer of the Word and its promises and thus the home of saving faith—these are among the designations historically utilized to support the exclusivistic affirmations.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Church History 1967
References
1. Barrowe, Henry, A Brief Discoverie of the False Church (1590), pp. 35, 14.Google Scholar
2. Browne, Robert, An answere to Master Cartwright his letter for ioyning with English Churches (London, 1583), p. 11.Google Scholar
3. Johnson, Francis, An Answer to Maister H. lacob His Defence of the Churches and Ministery of England (1600), p. 196.Google Scholar
4. Barrowe's, statement is included in A Collection of certain letters and conferences lately passed betwixt certaine preachers and two prisoners in the Fleet (1590), p. 67.Google Scholar
5. Johnson 's statement is quoted in Jacob, Henry, A Defence of the Churches and Ministery of Englande. Written in two Treatises, against the Reasons and Obiections of Maister Francis Johnson, and others of the separation commonly called Brownists (Middelburgh, 1599), p. 6.Google Scholar
6. Canne, John, A Necessitie of Separation From the Church of England, proved by the Nonconformists Principles, edited for the Knollys, Hanserd Society by the Rev. Stovel, Charles (London, 1849), p. 202 (originally published in 1634).Google Scholar
7. Ainsworth, Henry, Counterpoyson (1642) P. 39 (originally published in 1608).Google Scholar
8. A Collection of certain letters and conferences lately passed betwixt certaine preachers and two prisoners in the Fleet (1590), p. 6.Google Scholar
9. Barrowe, Henry, A Plaine Refvtation of M. Giffards Booke, intituled A short treatise against the Donatistes of England (1591), preface.Google Scholar
10. Robinson, John, A Justification of Separation from the Church of England (1610)Google Scholar, in Robinson's, Works, II, 490.Google Scholar
11. Ainsworth, Henry, op. cit., p. 21.Google Scholar
12. Jacob, Henry, A Defense of the Churches and Ministery of Englande (Middelburgh, 1599), p. 86.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, Francis, op. cit., p. 198.Google Scholar
14. Robinson, John, An Answer to a Censorius Epistle (1608)Google Scholar, in Robinson's, Works, III, 407f.Google Scholar
15. Jacob, Henry, op. cit., p. 47.Google Scholar
16. Henry Jacob, A Confession and protestation of the faith of certaine Christians in England, holding it necessary to observe, and keepe all Christes true substantiall Ordinances for his Church visible and Politicall (that is, indued with power of outward spirituall Government) under the Gospel: though the same doe differ from the common order of the Land (1616), p. B3.
17. Ibid., p. B8.
18. Penry, John, An exhortation unto the Gouernours and people of her Maiesties countrie of Wales, to labour earnestly to haue the preaching of the Gospell planted among them (1588) p. 47.Google Scholar
19. Barrowe, Henry, A Plaine Refvtation of M. Giffards Booke, intituled, A Short treatise against the Donatistes of England (1591), p. 134.Google Scholar
20. Quoted in Burrage, Champlin, New Facts Concerning John Robinson (Oxford, 1910), p. 19Google Scholar. The statement is from lost correspondence by Robinson, portions of which, however, are incorporated into a document of about 1609, written probably by William Ames and entitled, “An answer to John Robinson the Brownist, on separation from the Church of England.”
21. Robinson, John, A Justification of Separation from the Church of England (1610)Google Scholar, in Robinson's, Works, II, 395.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., II, 396.
23. Barrowe, Henry, A Brief Discoverie of the False Church (1590), p. 65.Google Scholar
24. Quoted in Burrage, Champlin, The True Story of Robert Browne (1550?–1633), Father of Congregationalism (Oxford, 1906), p. 12Google Scholar. The statement is from Browne's “A True and Short Declaration.”
25. Quoted in Canne, John, op. cit., p. 210.Google Scholar
26. Ball, John, A Tryall of the New-Church Way in New-England and in Old (London, 1644), n. p.Google Scholar
27. Browne, Robert, op. cit., p. 82.Google Scholar
28. A Dispute upon communicating at confused communions, n.d., p. 68, quoted in John Canne, op. cit., p. 281.
29. Jacob, Henry, A Confession and protestation of the faith of certaine Christians in England… (1616), p. A2.Google Scholar
30. Jacob, Henry, A Declaration & plainer opening of certaine pointes, with a sound Confirmation of some others, contained in a treatise intituled, The Divine beginning and institution of Christes true visible and Ministerial Church (Middelborough, 1611), p. 40.Google Scholar
31. Barrowe, Henry, A Plaine Refutation of M. Giffards Booke, intituled, A short treatise against the Donatistes of England (1591), p. 152.Google Scholar
32. Penry's statement is quoted in Johnson, Francis, op. cit., p. 178.Google Scholar
33. Barrowe, Henry, A Brief Discoverie of the False Church (1590), p. 158.Google Scholar
34. A True Confession pf the Faith, and Humble Acknowledgment of the Alegeance, which we hir Maiesties Subjects, falsely called Brownists, doo hould towards God, and yeild to hir Maiestie and all other that are ouer vs in the Lord (1596), preface (written by Henry Ainsworth). See Walker, Williston, The Creeds and Platforms of Congregationalism (Boston, 1960), pp. 50f.Google Scholar
35. Johnson's statement is quoted in Jacob, Henry, A Defence of the Churches and Menistery of Englande (Middelburgh, 1599), p. 46.Google Scholar
36. Johnson, Francis, Certayne Reasons and Arguments proving that it is not lawfull to heare or have any spirituall communion with the present Ministerie of the Church of England (London, 1608), p. 75.Google Scholar
37. Jacob, Henry, A Defence of the Churches and Ministery of Englande (Middelburgh, 1599), pp. 10, 19, 21, 32, 41.Google Scholar
38. Ibid., pp. 34, 88.
39. Jacob, Henry, Reasons Taken Out of Gods Word and the Best Humane Testimonies Proving A Necessitie of Reforming our Ckurches in England (1604), p. 17.Google Scholar
40. Ibid., p. 56.
41. Jacob, Henry, A Declaration & plainer opening of certaine points… (Middelburgh, 1611), p. 38.Google Scholar
42. Jacob, Henry, The Divine Beginning and Institution of Christs true visible or Ministeriall church (Leyden, 1610), p. 8.Google Scholar
43. Jacob, Henry, An Attestation of many Learned, Godly, and famous Divines, Lightes of Religion, and pillars of the Gospell, iustifying this doctrine, viz. That the Church- government ought to bee alwayes with the peoples free consent (1613), pp. 152f.Google Scholar
44. Jacob, Henry, A Confession and protestation of the faith of certaine Christians in England… (1616), p. B.Google Scholar
45. Ainsworth, Henry, Counterpoyson (1642), pp. 8, 15, 16 (originally published in 1608).Google Scholar
46. Johnson, Francis, A Christian Plea Conteyning three Treatises (1617), p. 216.Google Scholar
47. Ibid., p. 122.
48. Ibid., p. 220.
49. Robinson, John, A Treatise on the Lawfulness of Hearing Ministers in the Church England (1624)Google Scholar, in Robinson's, Works, II, 349.Google Scholar
50. Robinson, John, Of Religious Communion, Private and Public (1614)Google Scholar, in Robinson', Works, III, 108.Google Scholar
51. Jacob, Henry, A plaine and cleere Exposition of the Second Commandment (1610), p. D6.Google Scholar
52. Jacob, Henry, A Collection of Sundry matters; tending to prove it necessary for all persons, actually to walke in the use and practice of the Substancial ordinances in the Gospell, appointed by God for his visible Church spiritually politicall (1616), p. C2.Google Scholar
53. An Apologeticall Narration, Humbly Submitted to the Honourable Houses of Parliament, by Tho: Goodwin, Philip Nye, Sidrach Simpson, Jer: Burroughes, William Bridge (London, 1643), p. 10f.
- 3
- Cited by