Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:33:55.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Father Mathew's Disciples: American Catholic Support for Temperance, 1840–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

John F. Quinn
John F. Quinn
Affiliation:
Mr. Quinn is assistant professor of history at Salve Regina University, Newport, Rhode Island.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars have frequently noted that the American temperance movement had close ties with Protestantism throughout its long history. The Congregationalist minister Lyman Beecher, generally viewed as the founding father of temperance, helped spark the establishment of the American Temperance Society in 1826 with his Six Sermons on drunkenness. Later in the century devout Protestant laypersons, such as Women's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) leader Frances Willard and Nebraska congressman and perennial presidential hopeful William Jennings Bryan, took up leadership of the cause. In the early years of this century, as Protestants began to divide into warring liberal and evangelical camps, Prohibition was one—and perhaps the only—issue which could unite most Protestants, from the firebreathing revivalist Billy Sunday on the one hand to the scholarly, liberal Walter Rauschenbusch on the other.1

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 624 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Marty, Martin, Pilgrims in their Own Land (New York, 1987), pp. 374–378.Google Scholar

2. There was a Catholic temperance society in Rochester, New York, as early as 1828 and a small one in Philadelphia in 1838; see Bland, Sister Joan, Hibernian Crusade: The Story of the Catholic Total Abstinence Union of America (Washington, D.C., 1951), p. 10;Google Scholar and Jeffrey, Edit, “Reform, Renewal and Vindication: Irish Immigrants and the Catholic Total Abstinence in Antebellum Philadelphia,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 112 (07 1988): 419.Google Scholar

3. Father Augustine, , O.F.M., Cap., Footprints of Father Mathew, O.F.M., Cap., Apostle of Temperance (Dublin, Ireland, 1947), pp. 117, 123–124.Google Scholar

4. Quoted in ibid., p. 107.

5. Quoted in Jeffrey, , p. 407.Google Scholar

6. Kenrick, Francis Patrick, Diary and Visitation Record (Lancaster, Pa., 1916), p. 191.Google Scholar

7. Bland, , pp. 10–13;Google Scholar Dolan, Jay P., The Immigrant Church: New York's Irish and German Catholics 1815–1865 (Notre Dame, Ind., 1983), p. 129;Google Scholar and Spalding, Thomas, The Premier See: A History of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, 1789–1989 (Baltimore, Md., 1989), p. 144.Google Scholar

8. Dickens, Charles, American Notes for General Circulation (1842; repr. New York, 1985), pp. 207–208.Google Scholar See also Dickens, Charles to Forster, John, 15 04 1842, in The Letters of Charles Dickens, ed. House, Madeline et al. , (Oxford, 1974), 3: 192–193.Google Scholar

9. Rev. Machebeuf, Joseph to Purcell, Archbishop J. B., 1842, Purcell Papers, University of Notre Dame Archives, Notre Dame, Indiana. Machebeuf was appointed vicar apostolic of Colorado and Utah in 1868 and became the first bishop of Denver in 1887.Google Scholar

10. Gleason, Philip, The Conservative Reformers: German American Catholics and the Social Order (Notre Dame, Ind., 1968), pp. 37–38;Google Scholar and Dannenbaum, Jed, Drink and Disorder: Temperance Reform in Cincinnati from the Washingtonian Revival to the WCTU (Urbana, Ill., 1984), pp. 125–126, 151.Google Scholar

11. Pastoral Letters of the U.S. Catholic Bishops, 1792–1940 (Washington, D.C., 1983), p. 143.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., p. 144.

13. Kenrick, Bishop F. P. to Rev. Theobald Mathew, 18 04 1843, folder 2, no. 198, Mathew Papers, Church Street Friary, Dublin. Among those critical of Mathew were Michael O'Connor, bishop of Pittsburgh and an Irish-born teetotaller, and John Fitzpatrick, bishop of Boston, who was of Irish descent.Google Scholar

14. See Quinn, John F., “Father Mathew's American Tour, 1849–1851,” Éire-Ireland 30 (Spring 1995): 91–104.Google Scholar

15. Boston Pilot, 15 11 1851.Google Scholar

16. Tyrrell, Ian, Sobering Up: From Temperance to Prohibition in Antebellum American, 1800–1860 (Westport, Conn., 1979), pp. 260–261.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., pp. 282, 290–309.

18. Catholic Telegraph, 19 03 1853, quoted in Dannenbaum, p. 123.Google Scholar

19. Tyrrell, , pp. 264–269, 303–304;Google Scholar Anbinder, Tyler, Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know Nothings and the Politics of the 1850s (New York, 1992), pp. 43–44; and Dannenbaum, pp. 122–123.Google Scholar

20. See Bland, , pp. 42–45.Google Scholar

21. Corby, William, C.S.C., Memoirs of Chaplain Life, ed. Kohl, Lawrence (1893; repr. New York, 1992), pp. 291–293.Google Scholar

22. Clark, Norman H., Deliver Us from Evil: An Interpretation of American Prohibition (New York, 1976), p. 49.Google Scholar

23. Quoted in Bland, , pp. 45–46.Google Scholar

24. See Dolan, Jay, Catholic Revivalism: The American Experience, 1830–1900 (Notre Dame, Ind., 1978), pp. 147–158, 241. Between 1870 and 1900 the Paulists claimed to have administered the pledge to roughly thirty thousand men and women. Dolan believes that they pledged even more but failed to keep thorough records.Google Scholar

25. Bland's, Joan Hibernian Crusade (Washington, D.C., 1951) remains the definitive study of the CTAU.Google Scholar

26. Quoted in Bland, p. 60.Google Scholar

27. See Exodus 17: 1–7.Google Scholar

28. Carroll, John, America's first Catholic bishop, was sent by the Continental Congress on a mission to Canada in 1776; Charles Carroll, John's cousin, was the only Catholic to sign the Declaration of Independence; and John Barry was a naval officer during the Revolution.Google Scholar

29. Centennial Temperance Volume—A Memorial of the International Temperance Conference (New York, 1877), p. 730.Google Scholar

30. Swidler, Arlene, “Catholics and the 1876 Centennial,” Catholic Historical Review 62 (07 1976): 363.Google Scholar

31. Within a decade, however, most of these statutes would be struck down by the courts or repealed—suffering the same fate as the prohibition laws of the 1850s. See Clark, p. 74.Google Scholar

32. On Ireland, see O'Connell, Marvin R., John Ireland and the American Catholic Church (St. Paul, Minn., 1988), p. 9;Google Scholar on Keane, see Ahern, Patrick H., The Life of John J. Keane, Educator and Archbishop (Milwaukee, Wisc., 1954), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar

33. Reardon, James, The Catholic Church in the Diocese of St. Paul (St. Paul, Minn., 1952), pp. 235, 415–416. “High-license” laws made liquor licenses very costly for saloonkeepers.Google Scholar

34. Sweeney, David, O.F.M., The Life of John Lancaster Spalding 1840–1916 (New York, 1965), pp. 154–155.Google Scholar

35. On Americanism, see the summer 1993 issue of the U.S. Catholic Historian, entirely devoted to the subject. Among the issue's seven essays, see especially Margaret Mary Reher, “Phantom Heresy: A Twice-Told Tale,” pp. 93–106.Google Scholar

36. Bland, , p. 132.Google Scholar

37. Elliott, Walter, “The Church and Temperance,” Catholic World 51 (09 1890): 822.Google Scholar

38. Pastoral Letters, p. 232.Google Scholar

39. Brady, James, “Father George Zurcher: Prohibitionist Priest,” Catholic Historical Review 62 (07 1976): 427.Google Scholar

40. See “No Use for ‘Holy Beer’ at Notre Dame,” Voice, 12 05 1898 (the Voice was the Prohibition Party's newspaper). Walsh's three successors were teetotallers as well: Fr. Andrew Morrissey, C.S.C. ( 1893–1905);Google Scholar Fr. Cavanaugh, John W., C.S.C. (1905–1919); and Fr. James Burns, C.S.C. ( 1919–1922). In 1912 the CTAU returned to Notre Dame for its annual convention.Google Scholar

41. Quoted in Reardon, , p. 236.Google Scholar

42. Fogarty, Gerald P., S.J., The Vatican and the American Hierarchy from 1870 to 1965 (Collegeville, Minn., 1985), pp. 40–43; and Bland, p. 146.Google Scholar

43. Ahern, Patrick H., The Catholic University of America, 1887–1896: The Rectorship of John J. Keane (Washington, D.C., 1948), p. 81.Google Scholar In the 1896 lectures Father James Cleary denounced saloons and criticized the federal government for drawing revenue from taxes on liquor; see “University Chronicle,” Catholic University Bulletin 2 (1896): 218, 222–225.Google Scholar

44. As part of the Mathew centennial observance, John Ireland contributed a hagiographical essay on him: “Theobald Mathew,” Catholic World 52 (10 1890): 1–8.Google Scholar

45. See Benson, Ronald M., “American Workers and Temperance Reform, 1866–1933” (Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame, 1974), pp. 150–165.Google Scholar

46. Powderly left the Catholic Church to become a Mason in 1901; see V, Terence. Powderly, The Path I Trod, ed. Carman, Harry J. et al. , (New York, 1940), pp. 370–375. Powderly devoted sixty-five pages of his autobiography to “Ecclesiastical Opposition.” In addition to Corrigan, Powderly sparred with Bishop James Healy of Portland, Maine, and William O'Hara of Scranton.Google Scholar

47. Quoted in Fogarty, , p. 91.Google Scholar

48. Benson, , p. 167.Google Scholar

49. Quoted in ibid, p. 168.

50. Bordin, Ruth, Frances Willard: A Biography (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1986), pp. 7–11.Google Scholar

51. Bland, , p. 170.Google Scholar

52. See Writing Out My Heart: Selections from the Journal of Frances E. Willard, 1855–1896, ed. Gifford, Carolyn (Urbana, Ill., 1995), pp. 397–398;Google Scholar and Bordin, , pp. 168–170.Google Scholar

53. Kauffman, Christopher J., Faith and Fraternalism: The History of the Knights of Columbus, 1882–1982, rev. ed. (New York, 1992), p. 136.Google Scholar

54. Ibid., pp. 11–12.

55. Barry, Colman J., O.S.B., The Catholic Church and German Americans (Milwaukee, Wise., 1953), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

56. Bland, , pp. 127–128.Google Scholar

57. Quoted in Gleason, p. 37.Google Scholar

58. Kline, Omer, O.S.B., “St. Vincent Brewery Once Center of Controversy,” The Latrobe Bulletin, 25 06 1976, p. 36. My thanks to John Macey of St. Vincent's College Library for making this reference available to me.Google Scholar

59. See “Holy Beer Scourged,” Voice, 12 05 1898.Google Scholar

60. Rev. Zurcher, George, Foreign Ideas in the Catholic Church in America (East Aurora, N.Y., 1896);Google Scholar and Zurcher, , Monks and their Decline (Buffalo, N.Y., 1898).Google Scholar

61. The brewery was shut down in 1919 after the passage of Prohibition and the facility was gutted by fire in 1926.Google Scholar

62. Clark, , pp. 94–96.Google Scholar

63. Tracy, Joseph V., “Prohibition and Catholics,” Catholic World 51 (08 1890): 669.Google Scholar For similar arguments, see Cleary, James M., “Intemperance: The Evil and the Remedy,” Catholic World 58 (10 1893): 11–18;Google Scholar and Hewit, A. F., “Immoral Use and Sale of Intoxicants,” Catholic World 60 (10 1894): 1–11.Google Scholar

64. Bland, , pp. 202, 206.Google Scholar

65. Satolli had lifted Father McGlynn's excommunication in 1892. While Schroeder and Keane differed on a host of issues, Patrick Ahern notes that Schroeder was “completely unsympathetic and unalterably opposed to Keane's views on total abstinence. It may even have been one of the major reasons for the attempt to get rid of him”; Ahern, Catholic University, p. 139.Google Scholar

66. Nuesse, C. Joseph, The Catholic University of America: A Centennial History (Washington, D.C., 1990), p. 118.Google Scholar

67. Hogan, Peter, S.S.J., The Catholic University of America, 1896–1903: The Rectorship of ThomasJ. Conaty (Washington, D.C., 1949), p. 15.Google Scholar

68. Quoted in O'Connell, , p. 432.Google Scholar

69. O'Connell, , pp. 432–435.Google Scholar

70. Bland, , pp. 230–236.Google Scholar

71. Quoted in Hennesey, James, S.J., American Catholics (New York, 1981), p. 231.Google Scholar

72. Furthermore, Keane's mental and physical health began to fail after 1905. See O'Connell, , pp. 510–511.Google Scholar

73. Clark, , p. 112.Google Scholar

74. Brady, , p. 426.Google Scholar

75. See Ellis, William E., “Patrick Henry Callahan: A Maverick Catholic and the Prohibition Issue,” Register of the Kentucky Historical Society 92 (Spring 1994): 178–195.Google Scholar

76. Bland, , p. 261.Google Scholar

77. Clark, , p. 126.Google Scholar

78. Timberlake, James, Prohibition and the Progressive Movement, 1900–1920 (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

79. Clark, , pp. 186–187; and Benson, pp. 273–274.Google Scholar

80. Quoted in Ellis, John Tracy, The Life of James Cardinal Gibbons: Archbishop of Baltimore, 1834–1921 (Milwaukee, Wisc., 1952), 2: 537.Google Scholar

81. Pastoral Letters, pp. 255–333.Google Scholar

82. See Ryan, John A., “The Evolution of an Anti-Prohibitionist,” in Questions of the Day (Freeport, N.Y., 1931), pp. 29–36.Google Scholar