Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
It is a well-known fact that the German Evangelical churches did not hold the Weimar Republic in the highest esteem. This lack of church affection for the republic cannot be wholly explained with reference only to the monarchist, authoritarian intellectual and theological heritage of the German churches. Research in the Evangelical newspaper press and in official church proceedings and proclamations reveals that the republic's treatment of issues of vital concern to the churches played a crucial role in shaping church political opinion.1 Among the most important of these issues was the question of religious instruction in the schools. German children had always received such instruction as a regular part of their elementary school curriculum. Also, the overwhelming majority of school children before 1918 had attended confessional schools; that is, Protestant children attended Protestant schools, Catholics went to Catholic schools, and Jews to Jewish schools. Only three states, Baden, Hesse, and Nassau, had systematically established interconfessional or “simultaneous” schools (Simultanschulen).2
1. See my “The Evangelical Churches and The Weimar Republic, 1918–1933” (Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, 1977).Google Scholar
2. Samuel, Richard H. and Thomas, R. Hinton, Education and Society in Modern Germany (London, 1949), p. 100;Google ScholarEngelmann, Susanne C., German Education and Re-education (New York, 1945), p. 12.Google Scholar
3. Verhandlungen der verfassunggebenden Deutschen Nationalversammlung. Stenographische Berichte, vol. 326, pp. 663D, 665A; hereafter cited as VVDN. See also Evangelisch-lutherisches Volksblatt für Stadt u. Land, 07 13, 1919, p. 81Google Scholar (hereafter cited as ELVB); Allgemeines Kirchenblatt für das Evangelische Deutschland 68 (04 1, 1919): 154–157;Google ScholarPreuβisches Pfarrarchiv. Zeitschrift für Rechtsprechung und Verwaltung auf dem Gebiete der evangelischen Landeskirchen 11(1919): 16–17.Google Scholar
4. Giesecke, Hermann, “Zur Schulpolitik der Sozialdemokraten in Preuβen und im Reich 1918/1919,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 13 (04 1965): 162–177.Google Scholar See also VVDN, vol. 328, p. 1860A, D; vol. 329, p. 2164A, D.
5. The author has used the English translation of the Weimar Constitution as it appears in Frederick Frank Blachly and Oatman, Miriam E., The Government and Administration of Germany (Baltimore, 1928), pp. 642–679.Google Scholar
6. For editorial examples of this concern, see ELVB, 01 12, 1919, pp. 1–3;Google ScholarDie Wartburg. Deutsch-evangelische Wochenschrift, 01 10, 1919, p. 15;Google ScholarLicht und Leben. Evangelisches Wochenblatt, 01 12, 1919, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
7. Das Evangelische Deutschland. Kirchliche Rundschau für das Gesamtgebiet des Deutschen Evangelischen Kirchenbundes, 05 29, 1927, p. 175.Google Scholar
8. For example, see ELVB, 05 14, 1928, col. 82.Google Scholar
9. Quoted in Allgemeine Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirchenzeitung, 03 4, 1921, cols. 141–142;Google Scholar hereafter cited as AELKZ.
10. Bundessekretariat, der Jungsozialisten, ed., Programme der Deutschen Sozialdemokratie (Bonn, 1963), pp. 78, 86–87, 97.Google Scholar
11. The development of this theological quarrel in Germany is traced in Rathje, Johannes, Die Welt des freien Protestantismus. Ein Beitrag zur deutsch-evangelischen Geistesgeschichte. Dargestellt an Leben und Werk von Martin Rade (Stuttgart, 1952).Google Scholar The feud was in many ways similar to the present-day trouble in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod in the United States.
12. During the early years of the Weimar Republic, conservative and liberal churchmen locked horns in a bitter struggle over how best to create an all-embracing people's church (Volkskirche). At issue, among other things, were the nature of the church and the role of doctrine within it. Rathje's work treats the issue, as does chapter three of the present author's dissertation cited above, note 1.
13. Samuel, and Thomas, , Education and Society, p. 103.Google Scholar
14. Quoted in Tormin, Walter, Geschichte der deutschen Parteien seit 1848, 3rd. ed. (Stuttgart, 1968), p. 144.Google Scholar
15. Die Hilfe. Wochenschrift für Politik, Literatur und Kunst, 04 22, 1920, pp. 241–242.Google Scholar
16. Mehnert, Gottfried, Evangelische Kirche und Politik, 1917–1919 (Düsseldorf, 1959), p. 155.Google Scholar
17. Die Christliche Welt, 09 15, 1921, cols. 671–674.Google Scholar
18. Ibid. For similar opinions, see Evangelische Freiheit. Monatschrift für die Kirchliche Praxis in der gegenwartigen Kultur 19 (March 1919): 78–79; also Verhandlungen des Deutschen Evangelischen Kirchentages 1919 (Berlin, 1919), pp. 277–279.Google Scholar
19. ELVB, 08 21, 1921, col. 270.Google Scholar
20. Verhandlungen des 2. Deutschen Evangelischen Kirchentages 1921 (Berlin, 1921), p. 171.Google ScholarThe Kirchentag (Church Conference) was the legislative body of the German Evangelical Church Federation, which was composed of the individual state churches.
21. Ibid., pp. 234–236.
22. Die Christliche Welt, 12 17, 1925, cols. 1208–1209.Google Scholar
23. Licht und Leben, 01 4, 1925, p. 13.Google Scholar
24. Tormin, , Geschichte, pp. 150–155;Google ScholarLiebe, Werner, Die Deutschnationale Volkspartei 1918–1924 (Düsseldorf, 1956), pp. 107–121;Google ScholarTreue, Wolfgang, Deutsche Parteiprogramme 1861–1954 (Göttingen, 1954), pp. 106–113.Google Scholar
25. Samuel, and Thomas, , Education and Society, pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
26. AELKZ, 05 15, 1925, cols. 349–350.Google Scholar
27. Die Christliche Welt, 09 1, 1927, cols. 792–795.Google Scholar
28. Licht und Leben, 02 12, 1928, pp. 109–110.Google Scholar
29. Die Christliche Welt, 09 28, 1922, col. 748.Google Scholar
30. Ibid., February 22, 1923, col. 123.
31. Licht und Leben, 08 28, 1927, p. 557.Google Scholar
32. Ibid., May 24, 1925, p. 340.
33. Die Christliche Welt, 10 28, 1920, col. 700.Google Scholar
34. Quoted in Licht und Leben, 04 22, 1928, p. 269.Google Scholar
35. Verhandlungen des Reichstages. Anlagen zu den Stenographischen Berichten, vol. 366, no. 1883, pp. 1613–1628;Google Scholar hereafter cited as Reichstag Anlagen.
36. Verhandlungen des Reichstags. Stenographische Berichte, vol. 352, pp. 5479–5541 passim; hereafter cited as Reichstag.
37. AELKZ, September 25, cols. 717–718.
38. Reichstag, vol. 394, p. 11506A; AELKZ, 10 16, 1925, col. 779.Google Scholar
39. The text of the bill is in Reichstag Anlagen, vol. 419, no. 3654.
40. AELKZ, 08 12, 1927, cols. 763–764;Google Scholar October 28, 1927, cots. 1027–1028.
41. ELVB, 08 15, 1927, cols. 229–230.Google Scholar
42. AELKZ, 09 9, 1927, col. 861.Google Scholar
43. Ibid., October 7, 1927, col 955.
44. ELVB, 08 5, 1927, cols. 166–167.Google Scholar
45. Positive Union. Kirchliche Monatsschrift 24 (02 1928): 36.Google Scholar
46. ELVB, 02 20, 1928, cols. 32–33.Google Scholar
47. Die Christliche Welt, 12 1, 1927, cols. 1112–1114.Google Scholar
48. Ibid., October 6, 1927, cols. 931–932.
49. Licht und Leben, 11 27, 1927, p. 764.Google Scholar
50. Der Reichsbote, July 20, 1927, front page.
51. Reichstag, vol. 394, pp. 11506–11613 passim.
52. Ibid., p. 11613B.
53. ELVB, 03 23, 1928, cols. 47–48.Google Scholar
54. Ibid. See also the account in AELKZ, February 24, 1928, cols. 186–187.
55. Turner, Henry Ashby Jr, Stresemann and the Politics of the Weimar Republic (Princeton, 1963), pp. 234–235;CrossRefGoogle ScholarEyck, Erich, A History of the Weimar Republic, trans. Hanson, Harlan P. and Waite, Robert G. L., 2 vols. (New York, 1967), 2: 150–152;Google ScholarLicht und Leben, 03 4, 1928, pp. 152–153.Google Scholar
56. Die Christliche Welt, 04 1, 1928, col. 347;Google ScholarAELKZ, 03 2, 1928, cols. 210–212.Google Scholar
57. Licht und Leben, 03 4, 1928, p. 152.Google Scholar
58. ELVB, 05 14, 1928, col. 86.Google Scholar
59. The phrase “before the Deluge” is taken from Otto Friedrich's sparkling study, Before the Deluge: A Portrait of Berlin in the 1920's (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
60. Eyck, , Weimar Republic, 2: 153–156.Google Scholar