Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:25:04.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin Church of the Early Crusades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Matthew Spinka
Matthew Spinka
Affiliation:
The Chicago Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the conquest of Jerusalem on July 15, 1099, the preliminary objective of the First Crusade was attained. The victors who owed their astonishing success largely to negative factors—disunion and weakness of the Islamic forces—were thereupon confronted with the formidable task of consolidating their possessions and securing their power against Turkish counter-attacks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1939 , pp. 113 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 de Aguilera, Raimundi, Historia Franeorum (Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Historiens occidentaux, Paris, 1866,) III, 267.Google Scholar

2 Bréhier, L., ed., Histoire anonyme de la première Croisade (Paris, 1924), 102Google Scholar. But Raymond of Aguilers asserts that Count Raymond de St.-Gilles refused to make the promise.

3 Grousset, B., Histoire des croisades et au royaume franc de Jérusalem (Paris, c. 1934), I, 137–38.Google Scholar

4 Krey, A. C., The First Crusade (Princeton, 1921), 33Google Scholar. For an attempt to reconstruct Urban's plan, cf. Duncalf, Frederic's “The Pope's Plan for the First Crusade” in Paetow, Louis J., ed., The Crusades and Other Historical Essays (New York, 1928), 44–56.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., 43.

6 William of Tyre, Historia rerum in partions transmarinas gestarum (Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Historiens occidentaux, Paris, 1859), I, 364.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., IV, 489.

8 Ibid., I, 369.

9 Raymond, (Recueil Hist, occidentaux) III, 302Google Scholar; the anonymous author of Gesta Francorum regards him as a good man: “Simuiter elegerunt patriarcham sapientissimum et honorabilem virum nomine Arnulfum,” Bréhier, L., op. cit., 208.Google Scholar

10 Grousset, , op. cit., I, 189–90.Google Scholar

11 Hagenmeyer, H., “Chronologie de la Ire Croisade” (Revue de l'Orient Latin), No. 428Google Scholar; also Leib, B., Kiev et Byzance (Paris, 1924), 296.Google Scholar

12 Secunda Pars Historiae Hierosolimitanae (Hist, occid.), III, 550Google Scholar, mentions Bohemond and Baldwin in connection with the election of Dagobert, but not Godfrey; but Fulcher of Chartres speaks of Godfrey first: “et patriarcham in ecclesia Sansti Sepulcri tarn dux quam ceteri optimates praefecissent,…” Carnotensis, Fulcheri, Historia Hierosolymitana (Recueil, Hist, occid.), III, 366Google Scholar. On the other hand, Albert of Aix bluntly ascribes the election of Dagobert to bribery—“Great gifts which gained for him Bohemond and Baldwin.” Albert of Aix, Book VII, chap. 7.

13 William of Tyre (Hist. occid.), I, 387.Google Scholar

14 “Praedicto ergo viro Dei in sede colocato, tam dominus dux Godefridus, quam dominus princeps Boamundus, his regni, ille principatus humiliter ab eo susceperunt investituram.” William of Tyre, op. cit., 387.Google Scholar

15 Grousset, , op. cit., I, 195.Google Scholar

16 William of Tyre, op. cit., I, 388–89.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., 405–6. The genuineness of this letter has often been disputed, but Munro accepts it as authentic. Munro, D. C., The Kingdom of the Crusaders (New York, 1935), 70.Google Scholar

18 William of Tyre, op. cit., 410.Google Scholar

19 Albert of Aix, op. cit., Book VII, chap. 43.Google Scholar

20 Albert of Aix, op. cit., 538Google Scholar. As already mentioned, Dagobert's letter to Bohemond, as incorporated by William of Tyre in his work, makes no mention of any seizure of Jerusalem.

21 Ibid., 540–41.

22 Ibid., Book VII, chap. 62.

23 Ibid., Book IX, chap. 14.

24 William of Tyre, op. cit., 499.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., 594–95.

26 Translator of William of Tyre, op. cit., 598.Google Scholar

27 L'Estoire de Eracles Empereur (Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Hist. occidentaux) II, 60.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 61.

29 Budge, E. A. W., The Chronography of Gregory Abû'l Faraj (London. 1932). I, 327.Google Scholar

30 Hagenmeyer, H., Epistulae et Chartae ad historiam primi belli sacri spectantes (Innsburek, 1901), 164.Google Scholar

31 Leib, B., op. cit., 222–24.Google Scholar

32 Chalendon, F., Essai sur le règne d'Alexis Ier Comnène (Paris, 1900), 205.Google Scholar

33 William of Tyre, 274.

34 Hagenmeyer, , op. cit., 164.Google Scholar

35 William of Tyre, op. cit., I, 274.Google Scholar

36 William of Tyre, op. cit., 624.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., 620.

38 Gibbs, H. A. R. tr., The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades … of Ibn Al-Qalanisi (London, 1932), 245.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., 816.

40 Budge, , op. cit., I, 310–11.Google Scholar

41 William of Tyre, op. cit., 1071.Google Scholar

42 Budge, , op. cit., I. 311.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 156.

44 Matthew of Edessa, (Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Documents Arméniens Paris, 1869), I, 35–36.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., 37–38.

46 Chronique de Michel le Syrien, ed. by Chabot, J. B. (Paris, 1905), III, 191.Google Scholar

47 Bar Hebraeus speaks of him as “Papyas,” but distinctly affirms that he was “the metropolitan of the Franks.” Budge, E. A. W., op. cit., I, 257, 268–9.Google Scholar

48 Grousset, , op. cit., II, 181.Google Scholar

49 Michel le Syrien, ed. Chabot, III, 262.Google Scholar

50 Cf. my article on “The Effect of the Crusades upon Eastern Christianity” in the forthcoming volume entitled Environmental Factors in Christian History (Chicago, 1939).Google Scholar