Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
In the present discussion within the Roman Catholic Church over the requirement of clerical celibacy, the arguments generally center on the ascetical value of the practice. Pope Paul VI speaks of celibacy as a “precious jewel” leading to a life of selflessness for the man who seeks to follow Jesus Christ in the priesthood. When priests themselves talk about the subject, it is often in terms of its symbolic value as a total commitment to the service of the Lord. It is further seen as a practical measure, following Saint Paul's view that the unmarried state frees the ordained minister from the cares of personal family life so that he may devote himself entirely to the concerns of the whole Christian community.
1. “The unmarried man cares for the Lord's business; his aim is to please the Lord. But the married man cares for worldly things; his aim is to please his wife, and he has a divided mind.” I Corinthians 7:32–3.
2. It is not the purpose of this article to discuss the scriptural texts concerning celibacy. This has been done by Bunnik, R. J., “The Question of Married Priests,” Cross Currents, XV, 4 (Fall, 1965), 407–414Google Scholar; Joseph, Blenkinsopp, Celibacy, Ministry, Church (New York, 1968)Google Scholar, and Quentin, Quesnell, “Make Themselves Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven (Mt. 19:12),” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, XXX (07, 1968), 335–358.Google Scholar The only major English work on the history of celibacy to date is unfortunately very biased. See Lea, Henry C., History of Sacerdotal Celibacy in the Christian Church (London, 1907).Google Scholar
3. On this subject see Ronald, Knox, Enthusiasm (New York 1950)Google Scholar, and Hans von, Campenhausen, Tradition and Life in the Church, trans. by Littledale, A. V. (London, 1968), p. 233.Google Scholar
4. Irenaeus, , Against the Heresies 1.28 in Migne, J. P., ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: series graeca (Paris, 1857–1866), VII, Pt. 1, 690.Google ScholarHereafter, PG. Rigorist ideas later passed into Montanism and Manichaeism.Google Scholar
5. Clement of Rome, , Epistle to the Corinthians 38.2, in PC, I, 283Google Scholar; Ignatius, of Antioch, , Epistle to Polycarp 5.2 in PC, V, 273.Google Scholar See also Adolf von, Harnack, The Mission and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries, trans. by James, Moifatt (London, 1908), pp. 212–13Google Scholar, and Edward, Schillebeeckx, Celibacy (New York, 1968), pp. 21 ff.Google Scholar
6. Dodds, E. R., Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge, 1965), pp. 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MauriceGoguel, , The Primitive Church, trans. by Snape, H. C. (New York, 1964), p. 539Google Scholar; Grant, Frederick C., Roman Hellenism and the New Testament (New York, 1962), pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
7. Exhortatzon to Chastity 13, conclusion, in Migne, J. P., ed., Patrologzae cursos completus: scriptores latini (Paris, 1844–1864), II, 978. Hereafter PL.Google Scholar
8. This development is traced in Hans von, Campenhausen, Ecclesiastical Authority and Spiritual Power in the Church of the First Three Centuries, trans. by Baker, J. A. (Stanford, 1969), pp. 76–123.Google Scholar
9. Cyprian of Carthage, Letter to the priests, deacons and people abiding in Furni 1. 1: “… everyone honored by the divine priesthood and consecrated for the clerical ministry ought only to serve the altar and the sacrifices and to have time for prayers and petitions.” Cyprian: Letters, trans. by SrRose, Donna. Vol. 51 of The Fathers of the Church, ed. by Joseph, Deferrari (Washington, 1964), 3.Google Scholar
10. Didascalia Apostolorum, IV, ed. by Connolly, R. Hugh (Oxford, 1929), p. 32.Google Scholar On Ephesus, see Eusebius, , The History of the Church, 5.24.6–7 in PG, XX, 493Google Scholar and on Egypt, Clement, of Alexandria, , Stromata 3.12.90 in PC, VIII, 1188.Google Scholar
11. Adolph, Harnack, History of Dogma, trans. by Neil, Buchanan (New York, 1958), I, 176.Google Scholar
12. Ex. 19.15; Lev. 7.19–20; 15.16; 22.4 ff; I Sam. 21.4; Ezk. 44.9. The Jewish priesthood went through its “sacralizing” period after its return from the Babylonian captivity; see Martin, Noth, The History of Israel (New York, 1958), pp. 314ff.Google ScholarThe best presentation on this subject is the chapter “La sacralisation du service pastoral et les origines de la loi du célibat ecciesiastique,” in Jean-Paul, Audet, Manage et Célibat dans le service pastoral de l'Eglise (Paris, 1967), pp. 117–137Google Scholar; see also Hödl, L., “Die lex continentiae—Eine Problem geschichtliche Studie über dem Zölibat,” Zeitschrift flr Katholische Theologie, LXXIII (1961), 325–344.Google Scholar
13. James, Hastings, ed., Dictionary of the BibleGoogle Scholar; rev. ed. by Grant, F. C. and Rowley, H. H. (New York, 1963), p. 166Google Scholar; McKenzie, John L., Dictionary of the Bible (Milwaukee, 1956), p. 141Google Scholar; James, E. O., The Nature and Function of Priesthood (New York 1955), pp. 177–78.Google Scholar
14. Williams, George H., “The Ministry of the Ante-Nicene Church” in The Ministry in Historical Perspective, Niebuhr, R. and Williams, D., eds. (New York, 1956), p. 28.Google Scholar
15. Emile, Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. by Swain, J. W. (London, 1915), p. 309.Google Scholar See also Mircea, Eliade, Patterns in Comparative Religion, trans. by Sheed, R. (New York, 1958), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
16. Robertson Smith, W., Lectures on the Religion of the Semites (New York, 1889), pp. 435–436Google Scholar; Raphael, Patai, Sex and Family in the Bible and the Middle East (New York, 1959), pp. 152–64. Muslims must abstain from sex on the pilgrimage to Mecca.Google Scholar
17. A collection of these temple inscriptions can be found in Nock, Arthur D., Early Gentile Christianity and Its Hellenistic Background (New York, 1964), pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
18. Rose, H. J., Ancient Roman Religion (London, 1948), p. 36. Numen compares to the Polynesian mana.Google Scholar
19. Rose, H. J., “The Bride of Hades,” Classical Philology, XX (01–10., 1925), 241.Google Scholar See also Cook, A. B., Zeus (Cambridge, 1940) I, 394–95.Google Scholar
20. George H. Williams Comments on the forms of Christian ministry: “We know that these three kinds of ministry of the New Testament epoch were modeled in part on Jewish and pagan precedent and we shall take note of the extent to which they were elaborated in self conscious polemical parallelism alongside these rival institutions on the assumption that Christians were the militia of Christ under the heavenly emperor and the true or new or ongoing Israel of God.” (Williams, op. cit., p. 37).
21. Mansi, Joannes D., ed., Sacrorum Conciliorum nova et amplissima collectto, New, ed. (Paris, 1901–1906), II, 2, 406Google Scholar; Hefele, K. J. and Leclercq, H., Histoire des Conciles (Paris, 1907–1921), I, 1,212–64.Google Scholar
22. Audet, , op. cit., pp. 27–33Google Scholar; Blenkinsopp, , op. cit., p. 48.Google Scholar
23. Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta, ed. Centro di Documentazione Istituto per le Scienze Religiose (Basel, 1962), p. 5Google Scholar; Socrates, , Historia ecclesiastica 1.11, in PG LXVII, 101–104Google Scholar; Sozomen, , Historia Ecclesiastica 1.23, in PG, LXVII, 925.Google Scholar
24. Bailey, Derrick S., The Man-Woman Relation in Christian Thought (London, 1959), p. 33. The women were called subintroductae.Google Scholar
25. Jean, Decarreaux, Monks and Ciuilization, trans. by Haldane, C. (London, 1964), 70–117.Google Scholar See also Helen, Waddell, The Desert Fathers (Ann Arbor, 1957)Google Scholar; David, Knowles, From Pachomius to Ignatius (Oxford, 1966), p. 5.Google Scholar
26. Hefele-Leclercq, , op. cit., I, 2, 1029–49.Google Scholar
27. Basil of Caesarea, , On Virginity 2. app., in PG, XXX, 671.Google Scholar
28. Gregory, the Great, Dialogues 2.2, in FL, LXVI, 132.Google Scholar
29. Ambrose, , Concerning the offices of the ministers 1.50, in PL, XVI, 97–8.Google Scholar
30. Eusebius, , Demonstration of the Gospel 1.9, in PG,XXII, 81.Google Scholar
31. Jerome, , Against Jovinianum 1.20, in PL, XXIII, 249.Google Scholar
32. Cyril, of Jerusalem, Catechism 13.25, in PG. XXIII, 758.Google Scholar
33. Bailey, , op. cit., p. 73.Google Scholar
34. Petro, Bilaniuk, “Celibacy and the Eastern Tradition” in Celibacy, Frein, G. H., ed. (New York, 1968), pp. 44 ff.Google Scholar
35. Delhaye, P., “Celibacy,” New Catholic Encyclopedia, III, 374Google Scholar; Philip, Hughes, A History of the Church (New York, 1949), II, 199–201.Google Scholar
36. Gregory, , Letter to Peter, Subdeacon of Sicily, in PL, LXXVII, 506.Google Scholar
37. Schillebeeckx, , op. cit., p. 42Google Scholar; Bunnik, , op. cit., p. 418Google Scholar; Bailey, , op. cit., p. 148.Google Scholar
38. David, Knowles and Dimitri, Obolensky, The Middle Ages. Vol. 2 of The Christian Centuries (London, 1969), pp. 51 ff.Google Scholar
39. Ulrich, Stutz, “The Proprietary Church as an Element of Medieval Germanic Ecclesiastical Law,” in Geoffrey, Barraclough, ed., Medieval Germany, 911–1250 (Oxford, 1948), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar
40. Emile, Arnann and August, Dumas, L'Eglzse au pouvozr des laīques. Vol. 7 of Histoire de l'Eglise, ed. by Fliche, A. and Martin, V. (Paris, 1948), p. 268Google Scholar; Thompson, James W., Economic and Social History of the Middle Ages (New York, 1928), II, 650 ff.Google Scholar
41. Knowles, , op. cit., pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
42. Ratlier of Verona, Letters, in PL, CXXXVI, 585–86.Google Scholar
43. Mansi, , op. cit., V, 19, 503.Google Scholar
44. Horace, Mann, The Lives of the Popes in the Middle Ages, 590–1304 (London, 1902–1932), VI, 89.Google Scholar
45. Anselm, , History of the Dedication of the Church of St. Remigius, in PL CXLII, 1417–20Google Scholar; Southern, R. W., The Making of the Middle Ages (New Haven, 1953), pp. 125–27Google Scholar; and Brian, Tierney, The Crisis of Church and State, 1050–1300 (Englewood Cliffs, 1964), pp. 31, 32.Google Scholar
46. Adam, of Bremen, Deeds of the Bishops of the Church of Hamburg, in MGH, VII, pp. 346–347.Google Scholar
47. Peter, Damian, Various Works, in PL, CLIV. His books are found in PL, CLV, 159–90; 379–88.Google Scholar
48. Blum, Owen J., St. Peter Damian: His Teaching on the Spiritual Life, in Studies in Mediaeval History, New Series: Catholic University of America (Washington, 1947), 87–97, 175–;76.Google Scholar
49. Peter, Damian, Letters, 7.18, in PL, CXLIV, 45.Google Scholar
50. Mansi, , op. cit., V, 19, 907.Google Scholar
51. Alexander, II, Historical Works, in PL, CXLVI, 1383.Google Scholar
52. Walter, Ullman, The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages (London, 1955), p. 297 n.Google Scholar; Cantor, Norman H., “The Crisis of Western Monasticism, 1050–1130,” American Historical Review, LXVI (10, 1960), 55 ff.Google Scholar
53. Southern, R. W., op. cit., p. 141.Google Scholar For another view, see Gerd, Tellenbach, Church and State at the Time of the Investiture Contest (Oxford, 1959), pp. 166 ff.Google Scholar
54. Gregory, , Letter to Bishop Otto of Constance, in Ephraim, Emerton, ed., The Correspondence of Pope Gregory VII (New York, 1932), p. 53.Google Scholar
55. Mansi, , op. cit., XX, 437–38.Google Scholar
56. Robert, Benson, ed., Imperial Lives and Letters of the Eleventh Century, trans. by Mommsen, T. and Morrison, K. F. (New York, 1962), p. 149.Google Scholar
57. Brooke, C. N. L., “Gregorian reform in action: Clerical marriage in England, 1050–1200,” Cambridge Historical Journal, XII (1956), p. 11.Google Scholar
58. Southern, , op. cit., pp. 128–30.Google Scholar
59. Ullman, , op. cit., pp. 306–09Google Scholar; Geoffrey, Barraclough, The Medieval Papacy (New York, 1968), pp. 88–90.Google Scholar
60. Mansi, , op. cit., XX, 906.Google Scholar
61. Odericus, Vitalis, Church History, in Ross, V. B. and McLaughlin, M., Portable Medieval Reader (New York, 1960), p. 75.Google Scholar
62. Canon 7 in Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta, p. 167.
63. Canons 6 and 7, ibid., p. 174; Mansi, , op. cit., XXI, 715.Google Scholar