Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:13:56.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Puritan Notion of the Covenant in Jonathan Edwards' Doctrine of Faith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

C. Conrad Cherry
C. Conrad Cherry
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Religious Studies, Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The immense importance of the idea of the covenant for the Puritans of England and New England has been thrown into sharp relief by recent Puritan studies. Many problems regarding the origin and function of the Puritan covenant-idea still await the careful attention of the student of Puritanism, but this much is clear: the notion of the covenant was decidedly a pervasive idea in Puritan theology, and the idea was developed in a rather elaborate scheme by a host of Puritan theologians. As Leonard J. Trinterud has discerned, the idea of the covenant so permeated the thinking of the Puritans that in “the first decades of the seventeenth century … scarcely a single important figure was not a covenant theologian” among “the Presbyterian and Independent Puritans.”1

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 1965 , pp. 328 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trinterud, Leonard J., “The Origins Puritanism,” Church History, XX (03, 1951), p. 50.Google Scholar

2. Bulkeley, Peter, The Gospel-Covenant: or The Covenant of Grace Opened (London, 1646), p. A2.Google Scholar

3. Miller, Perry, Errand into the Wilderness (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1956), p. 98.Google Scholar

4. See for example Trinterud, Leonard J., The Forming of an American Tradition (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1949), pp. 171 ff.Google Scholar; Wright, Conrad, “Edwards and the Arminians on the Freedom of the Will,” Harvard Theological Review, XXXV (10, 1942), p. 242Google Scholar; De Jong, Peter Y., The Covenant Idea in New England Theology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1945), pp. 197–198.Google Scholar

5. Ames, William, The Marrow of Sacred Divinity (London, 1643), pp. 101–103.Google Scholar

6. Miller, Perry, The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century, Boston: Beacon Press, 1961), p. 415.Google Scholar

7. Winthrop, John, “A Modell of Ohristian Charity,” The Puritans, Vol. I, ed. Miller, and Johnson, (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), pp. 195–199.Google Scholar

8. Edwards, Works, Dwight edition (hereafter abbreviated WD), Vol. IV, p. 321. Contrast the position of Williams, Solomon, The True State of the Question Concerning the Qualifications Necessary to Lawful Communion in the Christian Sacraments (Boston, 1751), p. 11.Google Scholar

9. Miller, Perry, Jonathan Edwards (New York: Meridian Books, 1959), p. 30.Google Scholar

10. Sermon notebook on Ephesians, 3:10,Google Scholar dated April, 1733, Yale MSS. Printed, undated, in WD, VII, under the title “Wisdom Displayed in Salvation,” pp. 66–114; and in Works, Worcester edition, reprint in 4 vols. (New York, 1843–1844), hereafter abbreviated WW, Vol. IV - as “The Wisdom of God, Displayed in Salvation,” pp. 133–168.

11. Sermon notebook on Romans, 9: 18,Google Scholar n.d., Yale MSS. Printed in WW, IV, as “God's Sovereignty,” pp. 548–560; and in WD, VIII, as “God's Sovereignty in the Salvation of Men,” pp. 105–122.

12. “The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners,” WD, V, p. 531.

13. “The Sole Consideration, That God is God, Sufficient to Still All Objections to His Sovereignty,” WD, VI, pp. 301–302.

14. Justification by Faith Alone, WW, IV, pp. 77, 89.

15. “God's Sovereignty,” WW, IV, p. 558.

16. Sermon on Romans 9: 18, Yale MMS.

17. “Wisdom Displayed in Salvation,” WD, VII, p. 89.

18. Miller, , Errand into the Wilderness, pp. 63 ff.Google Scholar

19. Miller, , New England Mind: Seventeenth Century, p. 367.Google Scholar

20. Miller, , Errand into the Wilderness, pp. 65, 72.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., p. 98.

22. Institutes (LCC): II, ii, 20; III, xxiv, 5.

23. Preston, John, The Breast-Plate of Faith and Love (London, 1630), I, 31.Google Scholar

24. Bulkeley, op. cit., p. 306.

25. Ibid., p. 346.

26. Sermon on Romans 9: 18, Yale MSS.

27. “Observations Concerning Faith,” WW, IV., pp. 72–3.

28. Cradock, Divine Drops Distilled, quoted in Nuttall, Geoffrey F., The Holy Spirit in Puritan Faith and Experience (Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1947), p. 58.Google Scholar

29. Observations Concerning Faith,” WW, II, pp. 622–623.

30. “Justification by Faith Alone,” WW, IV., pp. 12–3.

31. “Obeervations Concerning Faith,” WW, II, p. 617.

32. “Justification by Faith Alone,” WW, IV, pp. 67–68.

33. Ibid., p. 68.

34. Ibid., p. 67.

35. Shepard, Thomas, Works, Vol. I (Boston: Doctrinal Tract & Book Society, 1853), p. 195.Google Scholar Cf. Bulkeley, op. cit., p. 286.

36. Preston, op. cit., p. 43.

37. “Justification by Faith Alone,” WW, IV, p. 68.

38. “An Humble Inquiry into the Qualifications for Full Communion in the Visible Church of Christ,” WD, IV, 321.

39. “A History of the Work of Redemption,” WD, III, p. 198.

40. “Miscellanies” Notebook, no. 329, Yale MSS — printed in “Observations Concerning Faith,” WW, II, p. 628.

41. “Observations Concerning Efficacious Grace,” WW, II, p. 552.

42. “Miscellanies,” no. 299, Yale MSS — transcribed by Thomas A. Schafer for private use.

43. “Justification by Faith Alone,” WW, IV, pp. 68, 72–73.

44. Owen, John, Works, Vol. V (Edinburgh: Johnstone & Hunter, 1851–1852), pp. 112–113.Google Scholar

45. “Miscellanies,” no. 617, Yale MSS — printed in appendix of Smyth, Egbert C. (ed.), Edwards', Observations Concerning the Scripture Oeconoiny of the Trinity and Covenant of Redemption (New York: Charles Scrjbner's 1880), pp. 67–68.Google Scholar

46. Ibid, p. 68.

47. Sermon on John 14: 27, cited by Gerstner, John H., Steps to Salvation: The Evangcelistic Message of Jonathan Edwards (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960), pp. 176–177.Google Scholar

48. This distinction between covenants was not novel to Edwards but had a long history in the Reformed fold. Witsius and Wyttenbach, for example, taught that the covenant of grace is the execution, through the conditions of faith and holiness, of the eternal pact between Father and Son. See Heppe, Heinrich, Reformed Dogmatics, ed. Bizer, B., trans. Thomson, G. T. (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1950), pp. 374–375.Google Scholar

49. Smyth (ed.), op. cit., p. 67.

50. Ibid., p. 66.

51. Ibid., pp. 66–67.

52. Ames, op. cit.

53. Smith (ed.), op. cit., p. 66.

54. Observations Concerning Faith,” WW, II, p. 614.