Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:02:27.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women's Attraction to Puritanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Amanda Porterfield
Affiliation:
Ms. Porterfield is professor of religion in Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.

Extract

In 1566 when the Puritan ministers John Gough and John Philpot were suspended from their pulpits and banished from London for their refusal to wear the white outer robe, or surplice, marking their special holiness as priests of the church, a crowd of more than two hundred women gathered at London Bridge to cheer them on as they left the city. As Gough and Philpot crossed the bridge, the women pressed bags of food and bottles of drink on them, all the while “animating them most earnestly to stand fast in the same their doctrine.” That same year, when John Bartlett was also ordered to step down from his pulpit in London for refusing to wear the surplice, sixty women assembled at the home of his bishop to protest the suspension. Such demonstrations of women's support for Puritan ministers were not isolated events. As the historian of Elizabethan Puritanism Patrick Collinson asserted, “it was the women of London who occupied the front line in defence of their preachers, and with a sense of emotional engagement hardly exceeded by the suffragettes of three and a half centuries later.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Collinson, Patrick, The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (Oxford, 1967; reprint 1990), p. 93.Google Scholar For further discussion of issues raised in this article see Porterfield, Amanda, Female Piety in Puritan New England: The Emergence of Religious Humanism (New York, 1992).Google Scholar

2. Moran, Gerald F., “Sisters in Christ: Women and the Church in Seventeenth-Century New England,” Women in American Religion, ed. James, Janet Wilson (Philadelphia, 1980), pp. 4853;Google ScholarDunn, Mary Maples, “Saints and Sisters: Congregational and Quaker Women in the Early Colonial Period,” Women in American Religion, pp. 3637;Google ScholarThe Records of the First Church in Boston, 1630–1868, ed. Richard D. Pierce, 2 vols. (Boston, 1961), 1: 84;Google ScholarPope, Robert G., The Half-Way Covenant: Church Membership in Puritan New England (Princeton, 1969), pp. 281282;Google ScholarMather, Cotton, Ornaments for the Daughters of Zion or the Character and Happiness of a Vertuous Woman (Cambridge, 1692), p. 48.Google Scholar

3. Records of the First Church at Dorchester in New England, 1636–1834, transcribed by Charles H. Pope (Boston, 1891), pp. 243250.Google Scholar For a brief discussion of the practice of assigning seats according to rank, see Winslow, Ola Elizabeth, Meetinghouse Hill, 1630–1783 (New York, 1952), PP. 142149.Google Scholar

4. Koehler, Lyle, A Search for Power: The ‘Weaker Sex’ in Seventeenth-Century New England (Urbana, 1980), pp. 33, 48;Google Scholar also see Keller, Rosemary Skinner, “New England Women: Ideology and Experience in First-Generation Puritanism, 1630–1650,” Women and Religion in America, vol. 2, The Colonial and Revolutionary Periods: A Documentary History, ed. Ruether, Rosemary Radford and Keller, Rosemary Skinner (San Francisco, 1983), pp. 132144;Google ScholarBarker-Benfield, Ben, “Anne Hutchinson and the Puritan Attitude Toward Women,” Feminist Studies 1 (1973): 6596;CrossRefGoogle ScholarThickstun, Margaret Olfson, Fictions of the Feminine: Puritan Doctrine and the Representation of Women (Ithaca, 1988).Google Scholar

5. Hooker, Thomas, The Poor Doubting Christian Drawn Unto Christ (London, 1629), pp. 154, 161, 169, 171;Google ScholarShuffelton, Frank, Thomas Hooker: 1586–1647 (Princeton, 1977), pp. 2870.Google Scholar Also see Hartwell, Jasper, The Firebrand Taken out of the Fire. Or, the Wonderful History, Case, and Cure of Mis Drake (London, 1654), pp. 22, 117;Google Scholar and Williams, George Huntston, “Called by thy Name, Leave us Not: The Case of Mrs. Joan Drake, A Formative Episode in the Pastoral Career of Thomas Hooker in England,” Harvard Library Bulletin 16 (1968): 278303.Google Scholar

6. Cotton, John, A Briefe Exposition on … Ecclesiastes (London, 1654), p. 3.Google Scholar

7. See Cotton, John, A Treatise of the Covenant of Grace (London, 1659);Google ScholarRutman, Darrett, Winthrop's Boston: A Portrait of a Puritan Town, 1630–1649 (New York, 1965; reprint 1972), pp. 106, 130;Google Scholar and Kibbey, Ann, The Interpretation of Material Shapes: A Study of Rhetoric, Prejudice, and Violence (New York, 1986), esp. pp. 6591.Google Scholar

8. Gouge, William, Of Domesticall Duties (London, 1622),Google Scholar in Stone, Lawrence, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800 (New York, 1977), P. 138.Google Scholar

9. Winthrop, John, “Speech to the General Court,” in The American Puritans: Their Prose and Poetry, ed. Miller, Perry (Garden City, N.Y., 1956), pp. 9293.Google Scholar

10. George, Margaret, Women in the First Capitalist Society: Experiences in Seventeenth-Century England (Urbana, 1988), P. 14.Google Scholar

11. For a fuller discussion, see Porterfield, Female Piety in Puritan New England, ch. 2.

12. Bradstreet, Anne, “A Letter to her Husband, absent upon Publick employment,” and “Another” (1), The Complete Works of Anne Bradstreet, ed. McElrath, Joseph R. Jr and Robb, Allan P. (Boston, 1981), pp. 181, 182.Google Scholar

13. Donahue, Jane Eberwein, “‘No Rhet'ric we Expect’: Argumentation in Bradstreet's ‘The Prologue,’” Crstical Essays on Anne Bradstreet, ed. Cowell, Pattie and Stanford, Ann (Boston, 1983), p. 220.Google Scholar

14. For a discussion of the centrality of ideas about the Holy Spirit as a means of identifying differences between radical and moderate Puritans, see Nuttall, Geoffrey F., The Holy Spirit in Puritan Faith and Experience (Oxford, 1946).Google Scholar

15. Thomas, Keith, “Women and the Civil War Sects,” Past and Present 13 (1958): 4447;CrossRefGoogle ScholarCollinson, , The Elizabethan Puritan Movement, p. 93;Google ScholarKoehler, Lyle, A Search for Power: The ‘Weaker Sex’ in Seventeenth-Centuy New England (Urbana, 1980), pp. 219221, 239.Google Scholar

16. Caldwell, Patricia, “The Antinomian Language Controversy,” Harvard Theological Review 69 (1976): 345367;CrossRefGoogle Scholar“The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at the Court at Newtown,” The Antinomian Controversy, 1636–1638: A Documentary History, ed. Hall, David D. (Middletown, 1968), p. 378.Google Scholar Also see Porterfield, Female Piety in Puritan New England, ch. 3.

17. Gouge, William, Of Domesticall Duties (London, 1622, 1626, 1634), pp. 1617;Google ScholarAxtell, James, The School upon a Hill: Education and Society in Colonial New England (New Haven, 1974), pp. 1920.Google Scholar

18. Perkins, William, Christian Oeconomie, trans. Pickering, T. (London, 1609);Google ScholarRogers, Daniel, Matrimoniall Honour (London, 1642),Google Scholar in William, and Haller, Malleville, “The Puritan Art of Love,” Huntington Library Quarterly 2 (1942): 245246.Google Scholar

19. Hooker, Thomas, The Souls Benefit from union with Christ (London, 1638), p. 59.Google Scholar

20. Mather, Cotton, Magnalia Christi Americana, Bk. 3 (Hartford, 1820; orig. 1702), p. 237;Google ScholarWinthrop, John, “A Model of Christian Charity Written on Board the Arbella on the Atlantic Ocean,” reprinted in The Puritans in America: A Narrative Anthology, ed. Heimert, Alan and Delbanco, Andrew (Cambridge, 1985), p. 88.Google Scholar

21. See Holdsworth, ChristopherJ., “Christina of Markyate,” in Medieval Women, ed. Baker, Derek (Oxford, 1978), p. 198;Google ScholarMorgan, Edmund, The Puritan Family: Religion and Domestic Relations in Seventeenth-Century New England (New York, 1966);Google Scholar Porterfield, Female Piety in Puritan New England, ch. 1.

22. For a discussion of the role of Puritan commitment to marital fidelity in the evolution of modern conscience, see Leites, Edmund, The Puritan Conscience and Modern Sexuality (New Haven, 1986).Google Scholar By the end of the eighteenth century, the losses women suffered from the cultural preoccupation with domesticity may have begun to outweigh the gains as domestic life in relatively affluent, urban families became isolated from economic production. But before 1700, the status of women improved as a result of the emphasis on family life because women's domestic roles were still integrated with many aspects of economic life. For a discussion of women's loss of economic status as a result of domestic isolation see Bloch, Ruth, “Untangling the Roots of Modern Sex Roles: A Survey of Four Centuries of Change,” Signs 4 (1978): 237252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. Carroll, John, “The Role of Guilt in the Formation of Modern Society: England 1350–1800,” British Journal of Sociology 32 (1981):459503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Shammas, Carole, “The Domestic Environment in Early Modern England and America,” Journal of Social History 14 (Fall, 1980): 14.Google Scholar