Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:52:23.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spartan Relations with Persia after The King'S Peace: A Strange Story in Diodorus 15.9 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

T. T. B. Ryder
T. T. B. Ryder
Affiliation:
The University, Hull
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Glos, who had been in command of the fleet and was married to the daughter of Tiribazus, fearful that it might be thought that he had cooperated with Tiribazus in his plan and that he would be punished by the King, resolved to safeguard his position by a new project of action. Since he was well supplied with money and soldiers and had furthermore won the commanders of the triremes to himself by acts of kindness, he resolved to revolt from the King.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 1963 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 105 note 2 Translated by Oldfather, C. H. (Loeb Classical Library, 1954).Google Scholar

page 105 note 3 Mentioned by Judeich, , Kleinasiatische Studien (Marburg, 1892), pp. 190 and 264Google Scholar; Beloch, , Griechische Geschichte III. i. 99Google Scholar; Swoboda, , R.-E. s.v. Glos (2), col. 1432Google Scholar; Hill, , History of Cyprus i. 139.Google Scholar Beloch is the exception; his comments are discussed later in the article.

page 105 note 4 III. ii. 226 ff.; Judeich, , locc. citt., while admitting that the Cypriot War went on until 380, keeps Diodorus' date (384) and has to make Glos' rising follow a temporary cessation of hostilities, which broke out again after his death.Google Scholar

page 106 note 1 Cf. Barber, G. L., The Historian Ephorus (Cambridge, 1935), p. 39.Google Scholar

page 106 note 2 On Diodorus' method, cf. Schwartz, , R.-E. s.v. Ephoros, col. 10Google Scholar; also Hammond, , C.Q. xxxi (1937), 84Google Scholar, and Gomme, , A Historical Commentary on Thucydides (Oxford, 1945), i. 52.Google Scholar

page 106 note 3 III. i. 99.

page 106 note 4 Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 4. 25–34.Google Scholar

page 106 note 5 Id., Agesilaus I. 36; Plutarch, , Agesilaus 15. 1.Google Scholar

page 107 note 1 Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 3. 27Google Scholar; Diodorus, 15. 23. 3–5.Google Scholar

page 107 note 2 Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 2. 7 (Mantinea), 5. 2. 32–36 (Thebes), 5. 3. 10–13 (Phlius), 5. 3. 18–19 (Olynthus)Google Scholar; cf. Isocrates, ' summary in Panegyricus 126.Google Scholar

page 107 note 3 Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 3. 21–25.Google Scholar

page 107 note 4 ibid. 5. 3. 26, cf. 2. 2. 20.

page 107 note 5 Cf. Smith, R. E., ‘The Opposition to Agesilaus' Foreign Policy’ (Historia ii [1953–1954], 274), whose silence on the settlements with Phlius and Olynthus (see p. 280) suggests that he does not connect them with the opposition.Google Scholar

page 108 note 1 15. 20. 2; cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 3.Google Scholar

page 108 note 2 Cf. Hudson-Williams, H. Ll., ‘Isocrates and Recitations’, C.Q. xliii (1949), 65 ff.Google Scholar

page 108 note 3 For the anti-Spartan purpose cf. esp. lines 9–11 of Aristoteles' Decree (I.G. ii 2. 43Google Scholar = Tod no. 123); for its popularity, cf. the list of allies in lines 79 ff.

page 108 note 4 Athenian reluctance, Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 4. 19; final decision, 5. 4. 34.Google Scholar

page 108 note 5 ibid. 1. 3. 1–2.

page 108 note 6 ibid. 3. 4. 4 (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 6. 6).Google Scholar

page 108 note 7 Xenophon, , Hellenica 3. 5. 5.Google Scholar

page 108 note 8 ibid. 5. 1. 32–33 (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 3).Google Scholar

page 108 note 9 Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 2. 32Google Scholar (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 4).Google Scholar

page 108 note 10 Xenophon, , Hellenica 6. 3. 19–20Google Scholar (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 28).Google Scholar

page 109 note 1 Cf. Diodorus 14. 110. 4 and 15. 19. 4, and Lysias' Olympic Oration (actually delivered at Olympia), which, in the view of the present author, belongs to 384.

page 109 note 2 I.G. ii 2. 43 (= Tod no. 123), lines 17–18.Google Scholar

page 109 note 3 Diodorus 15. 18. 1.