Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:45:58.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stoic Analysis of Tense and of Plural Propositions in Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos x 99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Paolo Crivelli
Paolo Crivelli
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Adversus Mathematicos (M.) x is the second book dedicated by Sextus to the discussion of the physical doctrines put forward by dogmatic philosophers. An extensive section (M. x 85–120) deals with Diodorus Cronus' arguments concerning movement.

Type
Articles
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 490 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Egli, U., ‘Stoic Syntax and Semantics’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Actes du collogue de Chantilly, 18–22 septembre 1976 (Paris, 1978), pp. 135–54.Google Scholar
Frede, M., ‘Principles of Stoic Grammar’, in Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford, 1987), pp. 301–37; 371–2.Google Scholar
Heintz, W., Studien zu Sextus Empiricus (Halle, 1932; Schriften der Königsberger Gelehrten Gesellschaft – Sonderreihe, 2).Google Scholar
Hülser, K., Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. Neue Sammlung der Texte mit deutscher Uebersetzung und Kommentaren (Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt, 1987–1988).Google Scholar
Marrone, L., ‘Il problema dei ‘singolari’ e dei ‘plurali’ nel PHerc. 307’, in Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia (Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1983), II (Napoli, Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi, 1984), pp. 419–27.Google Scholar
Mates, B., Stoic Logic (2nd ed., Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1961).Google Scholar