Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:50:22.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aeschylus, Supplices 249

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

E. W. Whittle
E. W. Whittle
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is the reading of M. presumably arose from a dittography ( for ). (Turnebus) has been generally accepted. The adverbial use of an adjective qualifying the subject of an imperative appears to be at least unusual; no examples are quoted (though this may be fortuitous) by Kühner–Gerth, i. 274–6. Robortello, followed by Tucker, preferred : but the earliest certain appearance of the adverb seems to be in Aristotle. I would propose : cf. Supp. 1015, Th. 34. This is no less satisfactory palaeographically, and the participle is demonstrably idiomatic Greek.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 1-2 , May 1961 , pp. 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This and the other references in square brackets are among Walter Headlam's manuscript notes on this passage in his copies of Wecklein's edition of Aeschylus; I am grateful to the Provost and Fellows of King's College, Cambridge, for permission to use this material. There is no indication that Headlam ever considered the emendation suggested. He discussed the line in C.R. xii (1898), 191.Google Scholar