Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
In his article in a recent issue of the Classical Quarterly Mr. G. M. A.Grube attempts to vindicate the authenticity of the Hippias Maior, concentrating his attention upon an article by me as ‘embodying most of the objections of earlier scholars’ against the genuineness of the dialogue. I believe that I am still ‘the latest exponent,’ in any detail, of this view; but I may claim at least some good company in the heresy, and to the names already cited by Mr. Grube or myself may be added in particular that of Wilamowitz, who also believes the Hippias Maior to have been written in the Academy within Plato's lifetime. I was not aware when writing my previous article of this noteworthy support in a work just then appearing.
page 82 note 1 July-October, 1926, pp. 134–138.
page 82 note 2 Journal of Philology XXXV. (1920)Google Scholar.
page 82 note 3 Platon (1919) II. 326 sqq.Google Scholar; p.328: ‘Der Dialog dürfte ziemlich alt sein, keine Falschung, sondem eine unfreie und unzulängliche Nachahmung platonische Art, noch bei Lebzeiten des Meisters in der Akademie entstanden.’
page 82 note 4 Plato and the Older Academy (Eng. Trans.), p. 71, n.61.
page 83 note 1 Sprachliche Forschungen zur Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge.
page 84 note 1 De Hippia Maiore qui fertur Platonis, p. 30.
page 87 note 1 P. Friedländer's Der Grosse Alkibiades ein Weg zu Platon is a recent attempt to vindicate Alcibiades I.