No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Having read Prof. Housman's article in the Classical Quarterly of October 1907, it seemed to me worth while, when I was in Madrid last year, to examine the MS of Manilius, Matritensis 31, in those places where Prof. Housman notes that the testimony of Loewe and of Mr Ellis disagree, with the result that I have found Loewe's account of the reading, as given by Prof. Housman, to be correct in all places except the following:
1 The same letter and form of contraction occur 1. 164 His Huncta manent.
2 It is open to doubt whether the original letter was d.
3 So written as to resemblepluraca.
4 Resembles dfatiis not defatiis.
5 But some apparently later hand m'etor, seemingly reading as nictor or uictor