Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:25:25.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on Callimachus, Hynm 5.83

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

G. R. Mclennan
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London

Extract

SOME years ago Giangrande acutely suggested1 that we should read at the beginning of this line έσтààθη δ’ φθοολλος in place of Buttmann' proposal έσàκη δ’ θολλος accepted by Pfeiffer. Giangrande' emendation received upport from Meillier, who wrote:2 ‘Giangrande … a trouvé de bonnes raisons pour conserver έσтààθη … et propose έσтààθη δ’ φθοολλος.’ No one seems to have realized that there is a metrical difficulty involved in Buttmann' emendation—an ironic fact, as his original intention was, of course, to restore the metre of the line. According to Buttmann' text, the first five feet of the line, in terms of dactyls and spondees, emerge as S S D S D. Callimachus does not seem to use this formation either in the elegiac metre of this hymn or in his Epigrams.3 The figures given by Beneke, based on Schneider' text, need correction in that there is only one example of an S S D S D line in the Epigrams of Callimachus (51. 3), not two.

That such hexameters occur in the Aitia6 is of no consequence. Callimachus clearly regarded the distichs of the Aitia as bound by less strict metrical rules than the distichs of the Epigrams and Hymn 5, as his employment of σπονδєιàζονтєς indicates. From all the above it follows that Giangrande' restoration is the more convincing as it is the first to be metrically acceptable.7

Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 425 note 1 CQ N.S. 12 (1962), 212.

page 425 note 2 Rev. Et. Gr. 78 (1965), 320 note 10.

page 425 note 3 See Beneke, , De Arte Metrica Callimachi (Diss. Strasbourg, 1880), 16.Google Scholar

page 425 note 4 First observed by Kaibel, Comm. in hon. Th. Mommsen, 328, and mentioned by Gow-Page, , Hellenistic Epigrams (Cambridge, 1965), 2. 172.Google Scholar

page 425 note 5 See Beneke, op. cit. 16.

page 425 note 6 See frs. 43. 48 and 75. 28.

page 425 note 7 The suggestions collected in Schneider' apparatus suffer from the defect just discussed; Schneider' own emendation cannot stand, since Callimachus allows hiatus only between a longum and a disyllabic biceps (Maas, Greek Metre, § 141). I need hardly point out that there are certainly examples of metrical unica in the Hymns of Callimachus, which are attested in the MSS. and are not the result of emendations by modern scholars.