Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:06:38.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Nicander, Oppian, and Quintus of Smyrna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

M. L. West
Affiliation:
St. John's College, Oxford

Extract

Otto Schneider, the first editor to use II, wrote , and he has been followed by Gow-Scholfield. The form is used by Antimachus, though not elsewhere by Nicander. Nicander uses tetrasyllabic forms from the stem ; he also uses

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 57 note 1 Cf. Schneider, O., Nicandrea, pp. 107 f.Google Scholar

page 57 note 2 Cf. 43–73. 87–114, 128–56, 162–79, 195–206, 224–41, 260–78, 298–311, 319–34, 347–75. 385–96, 402–14. 423–32, 443–64, 483–94. 51'-36, 546–66, 573–93. 601–28. The only exception, at 392, is a variant reading. In the Theriaca it is the reader who is imagined as being bitten.

page 57 note 3 Cf. Gow's conjecture in 423.

page 57 note 4 In Eur. fr. 996, where the Minotaur is called the adjective means something like monstrosus, i.e. not the product of a successful natural birth. Cf. Od. II. 249 f.Google Scholar (= Hes. P. Tebt. 271. 2 f.Google Scholar) This does not help here.

page 61 note 1 Way omits it in his Loeb translation: ‘'Tis with travail and toil Of strenuous war that brave men win renown.’

page 61 note 2 For parallels see Vian, loc. cit.Google Scholar In Aesch, . Th. 103Google Scholar is, as Murray says, ‘vix credibile’, and Askew's is supported by Ag. 1533.