Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:22:34.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paralipomena: Tibullus.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

That the hiatus in 33 is inadmissible in an Augustan poet has long been recognised by the critical. Of the three other examples, Prop. II xv. 1 ‘o me felicem! o nox mihi Candida et o tu,’ ib. xxxii. 45 ‘haec eadem ante illam (add iam) inpune et Lesbia fecit,’ and Manil. I 795 ‘emeritus caelum et Clausi magna propago,’ only the first can claim any excuse, on the ground of the speaker's excitement and the pause after felicem, but, metre apart, even there ‘nox, o’ seems a better order. But the corruption has had perforce to be retained in our texts through lack of a reasonable correction. The line is perfectly sound Latin as it stands and, though not poetry, is sense.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 40 note 1 L. Mueller (407) disputes the authorship.Google Scholar

page 41 note 2 Of the apparition of Romulus and so a good commentary on our passage.Google Scholar