No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2019
In this article I want to clarify the text of one of the short maxims assigned to Pythagoras in the ancient tradition, which are known as symbola or acusmata. Before I turn to the acusma in question, it is important to understand the context in which it appears. It occurs in Chapter 17 of Book 4 of Aelian's Historical Miscellany (ποικίλη ἱστορία). Aelian's work was written in the early third century a.d. in Rome, and is a ‘miscellaneous collection of anecdotes and historical material’. It consists of short chapters, usually a page or less long, that are for the most part independent of one another. Chapter 17 of Book 4 is about a page long and is devoted to the sayings and doings of Pythagoras. There is no particular connection between it and the surrounding chapters, and it is clearly meant to stand on its own. The preceding chapter (16) tells us that if we went to Callias for guidance he would turn us into drinkers, … if to Alcibiades, arrogant cheats, if to Demosthenes, orators, … if to Aristides, just men, … if to Socrates, wise men. The following chapter (18) recounts an anecdote about Plato's arrival in Sicily and his reception by the tyrant Dionysius the Younger. The chapter that I am concerned with, Chapter 17, begins by asserting that Pythagoras taught that his ‘lineage was superior to that of ordinary mortals’. This is followed by a list of superhuman acts and traits of Pythagoras, for example his ability to be in Metapontum and Croton at the same time and his golden thigh. The second two-thirds of the chapter are then devoted to the miscellaneous teachings of Pythagoras. Most of these take the form of the brief taboos and maxims known elsewhere as symbola or acusmata, among which is the text on which I want to focus here.
1 Wilson, N.G., Aelian: Historical Miscellany (Cambridge, Mass., 1997), 1Google Scholar.
2 Transl. Wilson (n. 1).
3 Burkert, W., Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Cambridge, Mass., 1972), 169Google Scholar.
4 See Hesychius s.v. and Burkert (n. 2), 171.
5 See Dilts, M.R., Claudii Aeliani Varia Historia (Leipzig, 1974)Google Scholar.
6 Gessner, C., Claudii Aeliani … opera quae exstant omnia (Zürich, 1556)Google Scholar.
7 Dilts (n. 5) and Wilson (n. 1).
8 Transl. after Babbit, F.C., Plutarch: Moralia, vol. 5 (Cambridge, Mass., 1936)Google Scholar.
9 Griffiths, J.G., Plutarch's De Iside et Osiride (Cambridge, 1970), 446Google Scholar.
10 See Burkert (n. 3), 127 for the correct text.
11 Burkert, W., Ancient Mystery Cults (Cambridge, Mass., 1987), 80–2Google Scholar.
12 The notable exception is Zhmud, L., Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans (Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Burkert (n. 3), 166–92 and Riedweg, C., Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching and Influence (Ithaca, N.Y., 2005), 60–77Google Scholar.
14 Huffman, C.A., ‘Heraclitus’ critique of Pythagoras’ enquiry in fragment 129’, OSAPh 35 (2008), 19–47Google Scholar.
15 Burkert (n. 3), 166–8.
16 Riedweg (n. 13), 74–6.
17 West, M.L., Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient (Oxford, 1971), 215–16Google Scholar.
18 Delatte, A., Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne (Paris, 1915), 277Google Scholar.
19 Burkert (n. 3), 170 and Delatte (n. 18), 277. See also Kahn, C., Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (Indianapolis, 2001), 10Google Scholar and Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E. and Schofield, M., The Presocratic Philosophers (Cambridge, 1983), 236CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Riedweg (n. 13), 75.